5
Ttastyb 5 points ago +5 / -0

I quit because I realized I had no idea who was and wasn't being raped. This is emotionally unpalatable. Likewise I realized I only found the whole thing vile after I had stopped for about a month.

Before you resist the idea of quitting you should consider your biochemistry might be a factor as well in your resistance. Take a long hiatus, and least a month and consider your own emotions about porn and your positive female relationships afterwards.

My two cents.

1
Ttastyb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably! Ill admit I lol’d. Thought everyone might be interested though.

4
Ttastyb 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shit ton of planes heading to florida.

2
Ttastyb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lets do a hypothetical: "Is X law in violation of the constitution if they regulate Y"

Regardless of X and Y you could argue the federal government is acting outside the constitution.

In practice I think there do need to be regulations above state level. I think some problems are legitimately difficult to control at the state level. But is that outside the founders intention? Perhaps.

Recall explicitly that interstate commerce is a federal authority; there are lots of regulations within that pervue.

4
Ttastyb 4 points ago +4 / -0

they sent it back to the lower courts. They already appealed, IE. the judge didn't rule in favor of ending trumps protocol.

Basically no result yet, but not necessarily bad.

I could be misunderstanding though. But that's what I understood the situation to be.

1
Ttastyb 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would be fun. I really have no clue what the first agency to be under attack will be. It could be as soon as this week, but I wouldn't expect it to have any effect for a while. There is also the outside chance businesses simply start ignoring certain rules.

6
Ttastyb 6 points ago +6 / -0

key take away is Scotus is actually acting consistently across cases.

9
Ttastyb 9 points ago +9 / -0

absolutely, this was already the basis of stopping the vaccination mandate on federal contractors. They already ruled that OSHA and the Federal Government overreached their delegated authority.

by catssix
1
Ttastyb 1 point ago +1 / -0

I assume that will become necessary at some point.

5
Ttastyb 5 points ago +5 / -0

You guys get the idea. Remember many regulations are also backed by law, and sometimes a Regulatory agency is acting within the scope of its legal creation.

7
Ttastyb 7 points ago +7 / -0

OSHA, FCC, CDC, DoE(department of energey),DoE(Department of Education), DHS, TSA, aspects of FBI/CIA, Banking shit. Banking wise I couldn't tell you what since I never understood that sector; FDIC I suppose.

by catssix
5
Ttastyb 5 points ago +5 / -0

copy pasted from my post in the other thread but relevant since the WV vs EPA decision still matters:

"The EPA interpreted their role as having the power to accomplish whatever task they were given. However the Court reviewed their evidence and said "naw bitch".. Meaning they stripped the EPA of their power to do things not explicitly granted by law. This reigns in the EPA, but also other regulatory bodies which have taken a similar view of their authority. Which is many. It also helps that the supreme court explicitly called out that they knew they were setting this precedent. Regulatory bodies are a way to circumvent having to right individual laws to control industry.

In other words: "Congress do your job" "Executive branch don't step outside the law"

short term gas will fall about 50 cents. Long term businesses will sue the crap out of the government regulatory agencies and win."

Don't expect abolishing at all. expect law suits. This is justice, but slow boring justice. Not fun executions justice. Enjoy those 8 dollars.

9
Ttastyb 9 points ago +9 / -0

short term gas will fall about 50 cents. Long term businesses will sue the crap out of the government regulatory agencies and win.

10
Ttastyb 10 points ago +10 / -0

The EPA interpreted their role as having the power to accomplish whatever task they were given. However the Court reviewed their evidence and said "naw bitch". Meaning they stripped the EPA of their power to do things not explicitly granted by law. This reigns in the EPA, but also other regulatory bodies which have taken a similar view of their authority. Which is many. It also helps that the supreme court explicitly called out that they knew they were setting this precedent. Regulatory bodies are a way to circumvent having to right individual laws to control industry.

In other words: "Congress do your job" "Executive branch don't step outside the law"

2
Ttastyb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed; self control isn’t in their lexicon. But hopefully, some will stop long enough for self reflection to occur. And hell if they stick at it good for them. Even if they’re crazy is better for society if they’re crazy and under self restraint.

8
Ttastyb 8 points ago +8 / -0

Welp, changing my shorts.

view more: Next ›