All you need to know about Donald Bren is he said Diane Feinstein "was the greatest politician from california in his lifetime". Though he's not a millionaire, he's a billionaire.
"Officially", he's the wealthiest real estate developer in the United States, and the Wealthiest Real Estate Developer outside of China in the World. Man has a Net worth near $20 Billion, and essentially owns 70-80% of Orange Country California.
It's not an exaggeration to say he literally built Orange County, since he's part of the group that bought the massive Old West Cow Ranch that was eventually developed into Orange County, and Specifically Irvine California. Though he eventually bought all his business partners out.
So yeah, he essentially owns Orange County and is at bloomberg/soros levels of wealth while supporting socialists. He's a deep state stooge.
You are literally quoting communist propaganda, from r/antiwork at this point. A rental property is a service, like any other. If there no one to buy their service, then the sector goes out of business.There's a blatantly obvious need for it, and you're idealistic bullcrap doesn't work in the real world. We've already essentially tried what you faggot communists are suggesting. Look at com-block "housing". It's essentially the same thing. Extremely high density housing, owned by the government, where no one had to pay rent because they didn't own the building or have a right to own property.
Oh but what's this, that magical "short work week" promised to all faggot communists suddenly becomes literal slave labor, because the tyrants who control every aspect of your life force you to slave for their sake. Hmm, it's almost like we have multiple historical examples of this to go off of isn't it?
Besides that, you have ZERO right to tell someone what to do with THEIR property or to seize said property from them. You want to bitch about blackrock, but then turn around and demand people give up THEIR property rights for you communist utopia crap. Hypocrisy at it's finest.
You're a piece of crap, burn in hell. This is becoming an obvious troll since this post has long since been deleted, yet you still keep commenting despite the fact only the people who commented before it was deleted can even see it.
I'll be blocking you now. Enjoy your marxist circle jerk and burn in hell where you people belong. I sincerely hope you either see the error of your ways, or burn in hell where you belong for spreading your marxist crap. You evil, Trojan Horse Faggot.
Apparently someone didn't read anything beyond the first paragraph of my comment. I laid out why that's more likely than not, NOT the case. And why it's far more likely that they steal a large percentage of the many thousands of smaller prizes that go unclaimed (officially anyway), with every drawing.
And for the record, the "Win X amount for life" guy, did win the top prize. It's why he's now guaranteed a six figure income annually for the rest of his life by the government.
I can think of one or two times in the past 10 years that there was a split jackpot prize. In fact, the first ever $1 Billion Jackpot was a three way split if I'm not mistaken. He's got a point, and poked another hole in your logic.
See, the problem with that is that, is that "the curse of the lottery" exists. Within a year or two, 95% of all lottery jackpot winners go bankrupt, and there's ALWAYS coverage of it. Heck, there's whole TV shows revolving around the stories of people ruining their lives after being stupid with lottery jackpot winnings. And let's not forget that only a handful of states allow for anonymous claiming. Meaning we almost always have a name to search for and see what has happened to them.
There's too much evidence that the overwhelming majority of lottery jackpot winners are legitimate. On the other hand, there's plenty of circumstantial evidence that the hundreds of billions in "unclaimed prizes" are being laundered away into slush funds.
Besides, as I said, I know several lottery winners IRL, so I have personal proof that not every lottery winner is a deep state stooge.
Either way, there's too much evidence that the majority of lottery winners are legitimate to just blatantly claim every single lottery drawing is rigged. To do so, is to ignore all evidence and base your claims solely on emotions. Which we all know ends badly 90% of the time.
Not really, It's actually pretty random where someone wins. The last one being in california WAS iffy because of the weird "glitch" they had, but there's been plenty in Red states. Texas has had quite a few jackpot winners over the years for example.
Everyone always seems jaded when it comes to this specific topic, so I'll give my two cents since I'm of the few with a contrary view on it.
The lottery isn't rigged in the way most seem to think. I know two lottery winners IRL. One of them won a moderately large jackpot (and still managed to blow it all on stupid crap) and the other won one of those "win X amount every day/week for the rest of your life" lotteries. He's done a little better, but that's because he basically just retired at 30 since he had a steady income for the rest of his life.
So I know for a fact THERE ARE legitimate lottery winners. I firmly believe most of these large jackpots are actually won by random people, who will more likely than not blow it all and end up bankrupt in a year or two, if that. Because they don't know how to handle money responsibly.
But that's a different topic. The "rigging" isn't the actual jackpot. It's all the "unclaimed" smaller prizes.Did you know that on average, there's something like $150-250 BILLION in unclaimed smaller prizes ($10K-$5 Million)? Supposedly, that all goes to the public school system of whatever state the unclaimed ticket was bought it, but we all know it never does. It get's laundered out to various slush funds for the cabal.
Most people don't understand how the lottery works. Every time a drawing is made, the proceeds from the ticket sales have to be split between payouts for smaller prizes, paying employees, and increasing the jackpot size if it wasn't won.
This is where I believe the actual rigging is coming in to play. The higher the jackpot, the more people will play. The more people that play, the more "unclaimed tickets" can be printed (probably in a similar manner to how election ballots are fraudulently printed into existence). Which means more money can be funneled away from the jackpot increases.
So for example, between saturday and monday, the $1 Billion+ jackpot increased by roughly $200 Million. When numbers get that large, it's entirely likely they probably had roughly $800 Million-$1 Billion in small prize payouts. Assume 30% of that was siphoned into slush funds. That's $300 Million they made in a single night that's virtually untraceable since no one cares about the millions of $10K winning tickets floating around.
If that happens 3 more times (And keep in mind the numbers will progressively increase), then they'll make more money than the jackpot will be worth. And that's not including all the money they've siphoned leading up to the $1 Billion mark.
So yes, the lottery is probably rigged. But not for the jackpot winner. They're preventing anyone from winning for long periods of time, in order to siphon off massive amounts from the smaller prizes (far more than any single jackpot will provide), and once they deem it to be to obvious, they'll finally let some random schmuck win it so that too much attention isn't drawn to it.
As for why we've had so many $1 Billion+ Jackpots lately, well it should be obvious. They're running out of funds, so they're desperate and pushing the envelope with this specific method out of desperation. If I were to hazard a guess, I'd say this one will probably be won around the $2.5-$3 Billion mark since each jackpot has been getting progressively higher when it was won.
No Landlord contracts? Ergo, anyone who owns a rental property no longer has the right do what they want with their property. Also, that stupid contract you posted outright says that private property ownership by individuals would be banned. It also bans the ownership of cars and other vehicles. And I can only guess what other crap you disgusting subhumans would try to ban "in the name of equity."
Also, stop trying to justify this with a bunch of "tax reductions". This is literally just a reddit communist utopia blueprint, and you're trying to justify it by saying "more time with family and less taxes".
Well guess what shill, it doesn't work that way. There's a reason this is literally what the WEF wants to do to the country of Denmark, and eventually the rest of the world. It's the start of some kind of Matrix-ish dystopia.
Regardless, if you actually believe in this, I have zero respect for you, and consider you subhuman like every other communist. You're not welcome here. This is literally a movement fighting against a global pedophile cabal pushing communism and other debauchery. If you're going to try and push this crap, then leave. It's not welcome, and you're not welcome.
There's a reason the mods removed your post. It's contrary to pretty much everything we stand for and are fighting for.
If you don't work for anything in life, and steal other's property while justifying it using literal communist propaganda, then yes. Yes it is "reddit trash".
Yeah, no. Absolutely not. This is literally straight from some communist r/antiwork or r/antilandlord reddit trash. In fact, I'll go a step further. This is eerily similar to the globalist WEF plan for Denmark. You know, where they're trying for steal farms from farmers to create a centralized smart city, in a hexagon shape no less, where they have UBI, banned private property ownership, no more cars, everyone is beholden to the government, etc.
So yeah, hell to the no. You lost me, and pretty much everyone else on here (or with a brain for that matter), when you start trying to ban private property ownership and force us all to live in tiny little cubicles in a dystopian urban hellscape where we're all under the government's thumb.
Get this communist trash out of here shill.
As of the last state level election (2022) the North Carolina GOP made a gain of two state level house seats and two state level senate seats, despite the fraud. This means that the North Carolina State Legislature is the most conservative it has been since the 2018 midterms.
At this point, you're just fear mongering over a state that's becoming redder, despite fraud, becoming blue when every possible metric, including the most recent election, proves the opposite is happening. Apparently all those "not really red but still kind of blue" transplants aren't voting how you're convinced they are. In other words, the red's aren't losing, they're winning despite the fraud. Why you insist on despairing over something that isn't happening is beyond me, but whatever floats your boat I suppose.
As for the cabal, that's the point. They ARE on a fixed schedule. It's part of their esoteric rituals. They HAVE to do certain things at certain points in time. It's why 9/11 happened on 9/11 instead of say, 5/17. Remember "Symbolism we be their downfall." And that's Q's words, not mine.
These people THRIVE on symbolism. So yes, the fixed schedule is still in effect, and that is why they're accelerating their plan and not slow walking it like you seem to think they are. The reason it isn't working out well for them is because the Trump judges and courts keeps blocking them at every given turn and preventing them from getting their way.
Several problems with what you've said. They're on a fixed time schedule (16 year plan remember). If what you were saying were true, they wouldn't have accelerated their plan to the extent that everyone can clearly see what's going on (like at the border for example). What you're describing is how they did things Pre-Trump. But it's blatantly obvious they've accelerated their plans to the point EVERYONE can see what's going on now. It's why they can't hide anything anymore.
Second of all, NC isn't different from any other state. It's a red state like any other. Look at Idaho, the third Reddest state in the union, but Boise is "blue". Better yet, look to Wyoming, the literal reddest state in the union. Still has three blue counties in it. "Blue" cities and counties, mean nothing when we have mountains of evidence of election fraud. Heck, look at Georgia (right next door to NC). It's more or less been proven that there were more than a million fake votes in the 2020 election in Fulton county and 2 adjacent counties alone. So three "blue" counties faked a million votes in Georgia. It's almost like those three counties aren't actually blue right?
NC isn't going to turn blue in the long term, in fact it's gotten redder the last several non presidential elections. You're operating under the assumption these people won and didn't cheat (at least that's the way you worded it), which simply isn't true.
As for the transplants, I'll never understand this mentality. It's been proven over and over and over again, that people moving to red states are overwhelmingly conservative by a margin of 85-95% depending on the state. The same is true of people moving to blue states and being liberal.
Transplants aren't the problem, and truthfully cities aren't the problem either. Election fraud is the problem. Blaming transplants is like trying to have our cake and eat it too. We can't claim that the left cheats everywhere and that we're the majority (remember, there's massive amounts of proof that California and NY went to Trump and have actually went red the past couple of elections if you discount the fraud), while simultaneously claiming that people fleeing those same states we believe are actually red states are turning our states blue.
Both can't be true, either it's cheating and we're the majority, or we're not the majority and this is all for nothing. And the evidence points to the former.
Well as I said, that strengthens my point. If things are that bad in Ohio, it should be stupid easy to steal on the federal level. The fact it's getting progressively redder serves as proof that they're not really in control and everything is being orchestrated.
To me, that strengthens my point. IF there's that many RINOs at the state level, that should make it that much easier to steal Ohio on the federal level.
Well I'm not familiar with Ohio Politics on a detailed enough level to comment, so I won't comment too much. The only thing I can say is that it's probably like many other circumstances. Choosing between two turds, so it's plausible that they picked the lesser of two turds by picking him over a literal communist?
As I said, I won't try to pretend like I know what I'm talking about since I'm not from Ohio and don't know what's going on in detail. I'm just giving a general overview.
Either way, my point still stands. If nothing else, it would be VERY easy to steal Ohio on a federal level, especially if there are truly that many RINOs at the state level.
Remember Assange, Snowden, and pretty much anyone else who has ever had a peak behind the curtain has outright said that 95% of politicians, regardless of political affiliation, would be in prison or dead if the public new the truth?
That's why. Even conservatives who generally vote for our side are compromised to some extent. They may not have enough blackmail on them to get them to be full blown RINOs, but it's near impossible to be in politics and be completely clean. That's why Trump is so unique. He's literally the only "clean" person to be in politics in the last several decades.
Yup, they're allowed to vote for literally anyone. It's how Trump got nominated a few times during the process despite not even being a representative.
Can't say I've seen any of this, but of course I'm in one of the reddest areas in the nation percentage wise. Also has one of the lowest jab rates if I'm not mistaken. I will say I've heard some weird rumors about the public school system, but our public school system locally is about to collapse since we've seen a 95% (literally 95%, I did the math) drop in enrollment, with most either homeschooling or going to one of the local Christian Schools instead.
Regardless, this sounds to me like a combination a mental illness, and possibly just mental breakdowns. Which if you think about it, isn't THAT unreasonable of a conclusion. Assuming you're in a liberal crabhole, it's reasonable to assume these people are slowly having their reality crumble around them. Everything they've ever believed in is a lie, and they don't know how to handle it.
Imagine being in their shoes for a second and experiencing that. And I don't mean in a "I used to be normal but now I know the truth and I'm a conspiracy theorist" type of thing. These people are literally having their world come crashing down around them. They've made HORIBLE life choices. They've never had to suffer the consequences of their actions. They've never faced repercussions for what they've done.
Now they have to face everything all at once. Their lives are basically ruined, and they're probably going to die soon. They know it deep down, even if they don't want to admit it. I have no comparable experience, but I'd imagine it's similar to being told you have cancer via text message, and the doctor leaving you to deal with it on your own.
And of course, there's the actual jab side effects. If you start factoring in that, well there's no telling what could be possibly going on. So overall, I think this is more separating the chaff from the wheat if you will. It's sad really, but I can't find it in my to feel sympathy for these people. We BEGGED them to not do this to themselves and to listen to us. And they did it anyway.
Long story short, they're living in a hell of their own making, and they can no longer handle reality. Ergo, they're having mental breakdowns without any possible help, since there's no way to help them.
I mean, while this IS true, you also have to realize that a large portion of these people are illegal immigrants or refugees and thus have no legal right to vote. Meaning it's STILL an election fraud problem. Besides, Trump has talked multiple times about mass deportation of illegals and refugees and retroactively revoking the citizenship of anchor babies since they obtained their citizenship through illegal means.
Get rid of the actual illegals and "refugees", and revoke the citizenship of their descendants, and suddenly everything becomes a lot simpler.
Bull crap. I don't usually take the side opposite of Trump, but that IS NOT the reason for the "lackluster" performance. We all saw the blatant cheating AGAIN. Abortion was even the top concern in most of the polls. Most people either oppose it, or don't care. Only an extremely small minority want it and obsess over it.
So no, this is blatantly not true, and I don't see the angle on this one.
As pointed out I couldn't find the article I was referencing in the original post about the general, but I found this while looking, figured I'd throw it out there. And it's not just "one rando". This is the equivalent of a secret service member stating the next POTUS will not be allowed to take office to his fellow secret service member or the Secretary of Defense.
But as I seem to have lost the article I was referencing, I won't try and defend it further unless I can find it again. However, this entire argument is inane anyway.
Really, you're arguing semantics. Even if it's not true, every other argument is. Explain the Brazillian military taking out lula supported cartels and fighting against the corrupted police forces to defend civilians? Both of which are documented factual statements that have either already occurred or are currently occurring (or both).
Couldn't find the original article I was thinking of, but here's a different one I found of a Brazillian Navy C.O. who's part of the Brazillian version of the secret service saying the same thing.
So my point still stands.
10% solution is a legitimate battle plan at this point, however I disagree with the rest of it.
Might I point out the last 3 years? Specifically, the difference between 2019 people and 2020 people. Took all of 3 or 4 months to convince most of the world population that the sky was falling and everything we've ever known was a lie. I'm not saying it will be easy, but it won't take as long as you seem to think.
From my best calculations, given what we know from Voter GA, The Pillow Man, Kash Patel, etc. etc. My best bet is that Trump won Georgia by 20-22%. Which firmly puts it in Deep Ruby Red territory. But that's just how much they cheat. I firmly believe that there are essentially MAYBE two or three actually blue states (Vermont, Hawaii, and Delaware)
Either way, Georgia is red, even despite all the cheating they've managed to stay red at the state level. So post cabal, I look for Georgia to be one of the top 10 reddest states in the union.