Well well well, the anglophone rulers rear their ugly heads. Appointing shadow cabinets, critics if you want, is a proud tradition in Westminster Parliamentary Tradition. What do I mean by this? From GPT:
The appointment of shadow cabinets—or critics—is a longstanding tradition in Westminster parliamentary systems. It involves the opposition party assigning members to "shadow" government ministers, holding them accountable and presenting alternative policies.
This practice doesn't apply to the United States because its system is based on the separation of powers. The executive and legislative branches are distinct, and there's no formal "opposition" in Congress tasked with directly shadowing cabinet members. Instead, checks and balances operate through congressional oversight committees, which perform similar accountability functions.
Why is this stickied? Because, damned right, this is relevant. I support Trump and all, but, let's not lose sight of the fact that there's a 1:1 replica of the Ark of the Covenant at Mar-A-Lago, either.
GAW runs on objectivity. If you think you see something that runs counter-narrative to our pro-Trump narrative, POST THE FUCK OUT OF IT.
Respectfully, I doubt that. Cryptocurrency was a several years long project, in fact, before Bitcoin white paper came out, there was something by someone named Adam Back called "hash cash." It was a decades-long project pretty much only in the domain of mathematicians and cryptography nerds.
This is hands down one of the most brilliant things I've ever seen from a meme perspective. I considered sending it to my friend who's slowly waking up from the mainstream trance, but he'd probably lose his mind over it. He wouldn't just roll his eyes—he'd go borderline ballistic. He doesn't realize it, but deep down, he gets what's happening. We've had some seriously tense and heated conversations lately, but we always manage to find our way back. He's a doctor in Germany, insanely intelligent, but watching him shake off the Kool-Aid? It's a trip. It's like watching someone detox from the most addictive substances out there.
A lot of what he knows is still buried in his subconscious. He doesn't realize he knows it. What would make him so furious about this meme is that, on some level, he understands it. He'd scoff and say, "What is this insipid garbage? This isn't policy, it's not a position, nothing's being proposed. You expect people to follow this?"
What he doesn't grasp—what all of us autistic, weaponized frogs who've been down the rabbit hole know—is the raw power of memes. They're like bunker busters, tearing through the layers of propaganda before the woke my mind fires that controls its host even detects that it has been thoroughly penetrated. After barrage after barrage, the facade starts to crumble, and the parasite will fall away, and the host will rise from their knees.
What we're witnessing is, without a doubt, the most glorious awakening I've ever seen in my life.
Stop living in this stupid case. Stop getting your news from Telegram
Please see this comment
The Brunson Case 20-1028, which has been mentioned in the context of the 2020 election fraud claims, has not moved forward at the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). According to publicly available information, the Supreme Court has previously denied hearing the case, with denials occurring in early 2023.
- **Status of the Case**: SCOTUS declined to hear the case in January 2023, and despite an appeal for reconsideration, they again rejected it in February 2023. There have been no recent updates suggesting a change in this status.
- **Potential Outcomes**:
- If SCOTUS were to rule favorably on a case like Brunson's, which claims that elected officials violated their oath by not investigating election fraud, it could theoretically lead to significant legal and political consequences. However, given that the case has already been rejected:
- The likelihood of SCOTUS reversing its decision to consider the case is extremely low.
- Even if it were reconsidered, the scenario where election officials would be arrested, and Trump reinstated, remains speculative and outside the realm of typical legal outcomes based on current judicial norms.
- **Surprise Factor**: The idea that this case represents a "surprise" in terms of leading to Trump's reinstatement appears to be rooted more in speculation and social media discussions rather than in grounded legal expectations. Legal experts and the current track record of the Supreme Court suggest that such an outcome is improbable.
In summary, while there's always room for legal surprises, based on the available information and legal precedents:
- The Brunson Case has not been accepted by SCOTUS for review in the manner that would lead to the dramatic outcomes suggested.
- Any narrative suggesting this case would lead to the arrest of officials or Trump's immediate return to office does not align with the current legal status or the consensus on how the Supreme Court operates.
Always consider that misinformation can spread rapidly on social media platforms like X, where posts might reflect hopes, biases, or misinformation rather than factual updates.
Yes, but you are implying that it is like a PROM or something with logic that enables an outside force to take over that person's brain when in fact all the neural link does is facilitate the brain's capability to, say, talk to a bionic arm
I'm just saying that it's kind of conspiratorial thinking, although, when it gets hooked up to AI, hey, there could be problems that really resemble your theory but, that's not where this is going for now, I'm very clearly so
🐸