by IAmOne
-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

Just be careful not to fall into that trap fren. There are too many people around here that automatically believe the craziest, most improbable theories without any independent research. It's an easy hole to fall into once a few things turn out to be true. Remember nobody's infallible, not even Q, and there's no way to know which posts were disinformation.

by IAmOne
-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

Combine the available purported facts with a simple bit of logic: would a billionaire founder of the world economic forum and one of the supposed leaders of the international cabal decide to dress like that and stroll around a public beach where he could be photographed?

by IAmOne
-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

Yeah exactly, which is why we don't have to make up nonsense about him.

by IAmOne
-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

I don't think you need to trust anything more than simple logic. Would a billionaire founder of the world economic forum and a presumed leader of the international cabal dress like that and stroll around on a public beach? It beggars belief.

by IAmOne
-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

It's not him. Some other guy with the last name Schwab who lives in Key West and doesn't like to wear clothes

by IAmOne
-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

Yeah too bad it's not him though.

by IAmOne
-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

Except it's not him.

by IAmOne
-1
comlib -1 points ago +2 / -3

You're right, we don't need to make up reasons. But people in here do it constantly and we all end up looking like idiots as a result.

by IAmOne
-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

I think it's pretty hard to believe that Klaus Schwab, founder of the world economic forum and one of the richest men in the world, would be wandering around on a public beach wearing that. People just want this kind of thing to be true so they can have another reason to hate.

-1
comlib -1 points ago +1 / -2

There's another reply here that describes it better than I can, but basically they can use the presence of luciferase to measure how well the vaccine components are being integrated, or as markers for the cells that have been trained, or whatever. Like it's good for tracking the treatments once in the body, like a barium milkshake for an MRI.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

That would be a pretty poor way to do a micro dot since the enzyme itself will rapidly break down and there's no evidence that your body would continue to produce it for very long after the vaccine. There's much more effective ways to permanently embed a marker into a person's tissues, like a small sample of a low grade atomic isotope. They could detect it under the skin and likely even tell when it was injected based on the decay rates.

Luciferase is a 150-year-old nothingburger.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

And for what it's worth, the term Luciferase was coined over 150 years ago.

Illuminase as in Illuminati? Might as well just call it Deepstatase. It's just a name.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

That debate I won't get into. My only point is that there's no real connection to the devil or Satanism because this word existed long before the concept of Satan.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +2 / -4

It wasn't his name until the middle ages and there's no resemblance (other than vaguely meaning the same "lightbringer" motif) to the original biblical name of the devil in Hebrew.

If you're going to be strict about names in the Bible you should probably be using the original ones, not the English versions that the editors of the KJV decided to use in the 1600s.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

Great reply. I doubt anyone will take it to heart.

-3
comlib -3 points ago +1 / -4

Luciferase has been used in biomedicine for a long time, far predating modern vaccines.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

Scientists like to get cute with naming. There's a species of colorful fly named after RuPaul. It doesn't mean the fly wears a sequinsed dress and high heels. It's just a name.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

Perhaps not a great choice of name given how many Christians have a visceral reaction to it, but it literally just means lightbringer in plain old Latin. Medical terms are usually derived from Latin so there it is.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

I won't call you a conspiracy theorist but the name Lucifer goes back hundreds of years before its use in the Bible and isn't even the original name for the devil. Lucifer was originally the Latin (i.e. Roman) name for Venus, the morning star. It was later used (in the middle ages) as the English representation of the original (similar meaning but very different pronunciation) Hebrew name of the devil, as well as being the root word for things like lucid, elucidate, lucidity, lucite, all of which relate to light.

It was used to describe this glowing protein because that's how you say light maker or light bringer in Latin. Most medical terms derive from Latin.

-10
comlib -10 points ago +4 / -14

"Biden's Department of Health announced it will stream an "all fact open lesson" on why "the COVID mandates are a necessity". Propaganda is pretty easy to spot y'all. Not sure why so many here are willing to trust Putin, a former KGB head who has worked for 40 years to bring down or damage the USA at home and abroad and who convinced his oligarchy to change the constitution so he can remain in power well past term limits.

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

You literally said in your comment "Just interesting there is no direct video evidence of it."

-2
comlib -2 points ago +1 / -3

Why would you cheer for anything Xi does?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›