It finally hit me today - why I think the DS is trying to force WWIII. Everyone seems to think this is about Ukraine, and the DS saving their money-laundering, child and organ-trafficking, bio-labs paradise. I think that is the cover. Sure, the DS needs all of that (and more) and can make great use of the underground tunnels and the tens of thousands of prisoners and wounded (for their organs). But - have you thought about the fact that if Ukraine was taken away the DS will just move their operations to some other country within a year and go forward as if nothing happened?
That made me realize that Ukraine is just a means to an end. What I believe the DS is really doing is forcing WWIII as a distraction for the Trump administration to keep him busy defending the US, Europe, and the rest of our allies for the next 4 years. The US could defend one or two places and still conduct normal business, but would have to completely concentrate on a world war. Especially if a few missiles hit US territory.
I think the DS believes that if they can keep Trump tied up for 4 years protecting our homeland, and that of our allies, he won't be able to drain the swamp, deport the illegals, withdraw from the climate accords BS, withdraw from the WHO, or do most of the reforms he promised. You know - the ones that will demolish the DS. They don't care about collateral damage if it means they win.
Besides - creating WWIII with a CIC Trump gives them an opportunity to stage a bogus attack they can blame on Trump (nuclear launch, destruction of someplace like the Parthenon or the Louvre, or killing a bunch of civilians) so he will be charged with war crimes. That could make it possible for them to kill the MAGA movement once and for all.
I think that is exactly what is going on, but I think Trump will be able to stop their plans with the help of Putin, Xi, and several other people who will understand what is actually going on.
Thoughts?
I think Dan deserves a promotion after all he did last term. This is what his X bio says:
Senior Advisor | 2024 Donald J. Trump for President. Former Asst to the POTUS & Deputy Chief of Staff at the White House 1/20/2017–1/20/21. 2015/2016–DJTFP16.
Chief of Staff is filled. Will he remain as the Deputy Chief? I don't know what else there is at the White House that he could run. I do know he needs to be there though. Any ideas?
How many of you remember during President Trump's 1st term what happened in the White House during 2017? Maybe this will ring a bell:
Why were certain rooms in the WH renovated?
Last time it cost way over $1M to do the "renovations" and the "pest removal". This time the current occupants have the benefit of hindsight since they will know where not to place "gifts". I'm certain there will be plenty of devices left behind - not only at the White House but probably also at other places like DOJ, FBI, CIA, DOD, and many more. "They" will want to know what is coming for them. I expect it. I'm sure our people also expect it. I just hope we find everything.
I held this back for about a week because I just didn't want to post it for fear it would give them an idea if somehow they saw this. Now I decided that WHs are more likely to see it and be able to prevent it from happening. I hope my theory does not become a fact.
We all know Ukraine now has F-16s, given to them from a few various countries - and not directly from the US. Regardless of where they recently came from, they are still American planes. Russia is understandably not happy about this, and would be justified in taking some sort of action against the US or NATO. Putin is still practicing great restraint, but that would almost certainly change if certain red lines were crossed.
I struggled to understand why we would even allow Ukraine to have the jets, given their track record with other advanced weapons systems we gave them and they quickly lost due to incompetence and lack of proper training. Ukraine has to know they are likely to be shot out of the sky (or on a runway somewhere) the first time a newly "trained" pilot taxis out to take off. Ukraine also has to know they have zero chance of winning this war and are entirely over-matched, both in manpower and technology.
So why would they want these planes so much?
Consider this. Ukraine wants the US and NATO to join the war because they think that is the only way they can win. Until now, they've had no real way of getting NATO or the US engaged. Enter the F-16s...
This is where it gets bad. The only way I see NATO and the US getting involved is if Ukraine forces Putin to act. The easiest way to do that would be for a Ukrainian pilot to fly an F-16 into Russia and bomb a large city full of civilians. While NATO and the US would try to say we weren't responsible, the alliance is responsible for giving Ukraine the ability to attack much further inside of Russia than the drones they are using on single targets. I think that would bring all of our bases and all of the NATO countries into a hot war immediately - which would be WWIII.
I think this theory is entirely plausible, and may well be probable. Hopefully one of the WHs that undoubtedly lurks here sees this and is able to do something to keep it from happening.
What do you guys think?
There are some very interesting deltas for tomorrow, 5/31. Even for today there were a couple of interesting ones. This is getting precipicy.
Deltas:
Some of my favorites from above:
Tomorrow
All assets being deployed. People used as pawns [controlled].
Buckle up. Here we go.
YOU ARE WITNESSING THE GREATEST [COORDINATED] DISINFORMATION CAMPAIGN TO EVER BE LAUNCHED AGAINST THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. INFORMATION WARFARE. INFILTRATION V INVASION INSURGENCY. IRREGULAR WARFARE. [D] EFFORTS TO REGAIN POWER.
Today
Insurrection Act of 1807. [Determination that the various state and local authorities are not up to the task of responding to the growing unrest] Call the ball.
Be vigilant.
Welp - I guess we should buckle up.
Over the years there has been much speculation about US Presidents having body doubles in some appearances, or in Brandon's case most - if not all appearances. Some people believe Trump has at least one double - the heavier, golf-playing double.
Assuming the doubles theory is true, what would happen if some crazy succeeded in assassinating one of the doubles that was appearing live somewhere while on live TV?
Consider the JFK assassination. It was shown worldwide (don't know about that day but certainly the footage was seen all over). What if that person was a JFK body double and was killed in front of everyone? How would the government handle that? Would they be able to just say - "sorry for that guy but he was a body double"? I would think that would take away a valuable tool they have to protect the President in case of certain active threats that are believed to be true.
Would they hide the fact that the guy was a body double, and push forward with the VP becoming the POTUS - so they could keep using doubles? If they did that, would the public ever know or would certain sections of the public always claim a double was killed?
Even worse - someone related to, or friends with, the double might actually know he was being a double that day. What would happen to them? Would they be killed, bought off, kidnapped, or even approached by globalists to be used to blackmail the next administration?
One other little problem - what would they do with the actual real and very much alive President - and his family?
This all just hit me today. I think this is entirely plausible, and frankly scary. What do you guys think? Possible? Could it have happened already? What would happen if it did and was eventually proven?
I've commented on this several times, so I guess it is time for an actual post.
A lot of people post Tweets or Truths, and people here that don't have accounts on X or Truth often claim the posts don't exist or the links are bad. They aren't. You can't see a post on Truth if you don't have a Truth Social account. As for X - now that Nitter is pretty much gone you can't see comments on tweets, but you can see the original tweet without an account.
There is a workaround for Truth, and a semi-workaround for X. Use https://qagg.news . This is supposed to be a research board, so you should be familiar with Qagg anyway, although it did disappear for a while so some newbies may not be aware. Qagg lets you lookup Q posts, Deltas, and Tweets/Truths from a lot of people or groups this board is interested in. Go there. Use it. You can even share the links.
The workaround for X isn't much - you can't see the comments like you could with Nitter. However you can see pics and video, and you can use the search feature inside of Qagg to search - for example - Trump tweets (including deleted tweets). Timestamps are also there.
When you go to https://qagg.news you should have a box at the top of the page that looks like this:. Click on the Tweets dropdown and select the users you want to view or search. The dropdown is big but the top of it looks like this:. Make sure you click on Save at the bottom of the dropdown.
To see Truths, click on the TRUTH dropdown and select the users just like you did for the Tweets. The dropdown looks like this:. You still can't see comments, but you can see the Truth and the timestamp.
Don't forget you can use Qagg to research Q posts and Deltas.
Enjoy.
Note - I am not a lawyer. Someone who is needs to weigh in also...
The other night I posted a reply to someone about Trump's $200,000 bail he will have in the GA case. I couldn't understand why he would even need bail since he is surrounded by federal agents at all times - he ain't going anywhere. Then I heard about the terms of the bail... Number 4(e) specifically worries me.
(4) The Defendant shall perform no act to intimidate any person known to him or her to be a codefendant or witness in this case or to otherwise obstruct the administration of justice. Id. This shall include, but is not limited to, the following:
a. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against any codefendant;
b. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against any witness including, but not limited to, the individuals designated in the Indictment as an unindicated co-conspirators Individual 1 through Individual 30;
c. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against any victim;
d. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against the community or to any property in the community;
e. **The above shall include, but are not limited to, posts on social media or reposts of posts made by another individual on social media; **
The terms are wide open with the "but is not limited to". I think they are going to either frame him with social media posts, or just wait for a "mean tweet" and put him in jail. Worse yet - his team is asking for a 2026 trial date. If the judge suddenly and magically agrees and the DA also magically agrees then they are planning to put him away through the election.
Someone on his team needs to know this.
Here are his actual bail terms: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23921620/23sc188947-consent-order.pdf
While reading a post by u/Cajunmommabear38 I noticed an interesting comment by u/Eel3 saying they believe Fauci was actually being detained by the Marshals and it is not their job to be bodyguards.
This is an interesting comment, although Eel3 is actually wrong about Marshals not providing protective services. They are the primary agency that is assigned to protect SCOTUS, other federal judges, some US Attorneys, and certain high-value witnesses. They are also often used when no other agency fits the protection required.
While I was looking this up I found a CNN article complaining about the Trump administration wanting to use the USMS to provide security for certain cabinet-level appointees. Now I know it's a CNN article, but in this case they may have accidentally stumbled on the truth without even realizing it. I know - mind-blowing, right?
Typically the protective details are assigned using armed agents from their agencies, but this came up when Betsy DeVos (Education Secretary) needed security after being attacked early on. Ed Dept doesn't have armed security so the Marshals were used. They also often deputize armed officers from other agencies to perform protection because they don't have enough Marshals to fit that mission.
The article had a very interesting ending that got me thinking.
One source familiar with the ongoing discussions said a potential benefit of this new arrangement would be greater oversight and accountability of Cabinet-level protective operations because armed personnel would fall within the Marshals’ chain of command and not report directly to the agencies to which they are assigned.
https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/21/politics/us-marshals-cabinet-security/index.html
The Trump administration in 2018 wanted US Marshals to provide protection for cabinet-level officials, and the officers would not report to the cabinet agency, but to the US Marshals. Think about that for a moment. What would that allow? If Trump knew there were going to be a bunch of arrests for high-ranking people in the government why would he want them protected by the Marshals instead of for example the FBI or DHS, USSS, DSS, or even DOD? Maybe because all of those agencies have their own Deep State people that could either "lose" the protectee/detainee or maybe practice a little arkancide. It's worth noting that the media and much of the government was entirely against the idea from the start, so that tells me it is a good idea.
I think Trump was planning on the arrests 5 years ago and already starting to setup the process necessary to keep them safe and secure, and more importantly detained without anyone even realizing it.
I don't know yet if the program was ever legitimized via CONgress, but obviously it is still in place if they are "protecting" Fauci. Who knows - the fact that Fauci is still receiving a protective detail now being known may force other actions. Fauci is not entitled to any protection as a retiree, so I expect CONgress to have hearings on the how and why. That may buy a little time, but not much more than a month or two. Something will have to be done soon.
Since the post I was reading from u/Cajunmommabear38 was actually about Rand Paul saying Fauci was referred to DOJ for lying to CONgress, I'd say something is happening.
I also used this article for some of my research: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/protecting-us-government-leaders-security-analysis/story?id=66258938
I can't dig on this right now (at work) but I just heard the white house muppet in her press briefing say the White House is working to establish an Office of Pandemic Preparedness. I'm sure there will be sauce in a little while.
Scary part is she dropped that nonchalantly, and right before turning the briefing over to Mayorkis. Seems like what they do with a Friday afternoon drop - bury the stuff that could be big underneath something else when something big is already going on.
Why would they be working to set up a pandemic preparedness office in the White House now? What is coming, and how soon?
So This has been bothering me for about a week now. The US hit our $31.4T debt ceiling in January, and since then the Fed has been using "extraordinary measures" to continue govt operations. They say that will only last until somewhere around June before the US defaults. Supposedly the govt only spent $20-25B to bail out some of the depositors, and theoretically that money should have come from the roughly $128B the FDIC maintains in the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). I also think they spent FAR MORE than they are telling us, but have zero evidence other than a gut feeling.
What I'm wondering is if that fund actually exists, or is it a bunch of post-it IOU notes in a drawer somewhere like they did with Social Security and Medicare, or even the US gold? If that kind of money is sitting around somewhere some Dem would use it to "combat climate change" or make treadmills for shrimp, or whatever the govt wastes our money on. I seriously doubt that money actually still exists (if it ever did).
Where did they get the $20-25B to hand over to the people who can't follow simple directions and only put the amount of money that is insured into the bank? Biden authorized that money (which he can't legally do anyway) and I think there is a good possibility that it was outside of the measures the Fed is using to buy time before we default.
Shouldn't this be a bigger deal and actually hit the mainstream news, assuming someone is actually paying attention? I know $25B won't go far, but what if they spent far more than that? What if there are other banks failing that the govt bailed out and kept under wraps "to quell panic"? What if the Fed had that $128B counted into their "extraordinary measures" fund to keep us from default? Remember - Wells Fargo had "issues" recently where people's paychecks disappeared from their accounts. Maybe that spurred the Fed to rescue them and they kept it secret.
Do we have anyone here who "watches the fed" (FedFags?) that can shed more light on this? Is it possible the bank runs were engineered to force the Republicans to bend to Biden and raise the debt limit with no cuts? I don't know, but something just doesn't seem right.
