I've commented on this several times, so I guess it is time for an actual post.

A lot of people post Tweets or Truths, and people here that don't have accounts on X or Truth often claim the posts don't exist or the links are bad. They aren't. You can't see a post on Truth if you don't have a Truth Social account. As for X - now that Nitter is pretty much gone you can't see comments on tweets, but you can see the original tweet without an account.

There is a workaround for Truth, and a semi-workaround for X. Use https://qagg.news . This is supposed to be a research board, so you should be familiar with Qagg anyway, although it did disappear for a while so some newbies may not be aware. Qagg lets you lookup Q posts, Deltas, and Tweets/Truths from a lot of people or groups this board is interested in. Go there. Use it. You can even share the links.

The workaround for X isn't much - you can't see the comments like you could with Nitter. However you can see pics and video, and you can use the search feature inside of Qagg to search - for example - Trump tweets (including deleted tweets). Timestamps are also there.

When you go to https://qagg.news you should have a box at the top of the page that looks like this:. Click on the Tweets dropdown and select the users you want to view or search. The dropdown is big but the top of it looks like this:. Make sure you click on Save at the bottom of the dropdown.

To see Truths, click on the TRUTH dropdown and select the users just like you did for the Tweets. The dropdown looks like this:. You still can't see comments, but you can see the Truth and the timestamp.

Don't forget you can use Qagg to research Q posts and Deltas.

Enjoy.

Note - I am not a lawyer. Someone who is needs to weigh in also...

The other night I posted a reply to someone about Trump's $200,000 bail he will have in the GA case. I couldn't understand why he would even need bail since he is surrounded by federal agents at all times - he ain't going anywhere. Then I heard about the terms of the bail... Number 4(e) specifically worries me.

(4) The Defendant shall perform no act to intimidate any person known to him or her to be a codefendant or witness in this case or to otherwise obstruct the administration of justice. Id. This shall include, but is not limited to, the following:

a. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against any codefendant;

b. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against any witness including, but not limited to, the individuals designated in the Indictment as an unindicated co-conspirators Individual 1 through Individual 30;

c. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against any victim;

d. The Defendant shall make no direct or indirect threat of any nature against the community or to any property in the community;

e. **The above shall include, but are not limited to, posts on social media or reposts of posts made by another individual on social media; **

The terms are wide open with the "but is not limited to". I think they are going to either frame him with social media posts, or just wait for a "mean tweet" and put him in jail. Worse yet - his team is asking for a 2026 trial date. If the judge suddenly and magically agrees and the DA also magically agrees then they are planning to put him away through the election.

Someone on his team needs to know this.

Here are his actual bail terms: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23921620/23sc188947-consent-order.pdf

While reading a post by u/Cajunmommabear38 I noticed an interesting comment by u/Eel3 saying they believe Fauci was actually being detained by the Marshals and it is not their job to be bodyguards.

This is an interesting comment, although Eel3 is actually wrong about Marshals not providing protective services. They are the primary agency that is assigned to protect SCOTUS, other federal judges, some US Attorneys, and certain high-value witnesses. They are also often used when no other agency fits the protection required.

While I was looking this up I found a CNN article complaining about the Trump administration wanting to use the USMS to provide security for certain cabinet-level appointees. Now I know it's a CNN article, but in this case they may have accidentally stumbled on the truth without even realizing it. I know - mind-blowing, right?

Typically the protective details are assigned using armed agents from their agencies, but this came up when Betsy DeVos (Education Secretary) needed security after being attacked early on. Ed Dept doesn't have armed security so the Marshals were used. They also often deputize armed officers from other agencies to perform protection because they don't have enough Marshals to fit that mission.

The article had a very interesting ending that got me thinking.

One source familiar with the ongoing discussions said a potential benefit of this new arrangement would be greater oversight and accountability of Cabinet-level protective operations because armed personnel would fall within the Marshals’ chain of command and not report directly to the agencies to which they are assigned.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/06/21/politics/us-marshals-cabinet-security/index.html

The Trump administration in 2018 wanted US Marshals to provide protection for cabinet-level officials, and the officers would not report to the cabinet agency, but to the US Marshals. Think about that for a moment. What would that allow? If Trump knew there were going to be a bunch of arrests for high-ranking people in the government why would he want them protected by the Marshals instead of for example the FBI or DHS, USSS, DSS, or even DOD? Maybe because all of those agencies have their own Deep State people that could either "lose" the protectee/detainee or maybe practice a little arkancide. It's worth noting that the media and much of the government was entirely against the idea from the start, so that tells me it is a good idea.

I think Trump was planning on the arrests 5 years ago and already starting to setup the process necessary to keep them safe and secure, and more importantly detained without anyone even realizing it.

I don't know yet if the program was ever legitimized via CONgress, but obviously it is still in place if they are "protecting" Fauci. Who knows - the fact that Fauci is still receiving a protective detail now being known may force other actions. Fauci is not entitled to any protection as a retiree, so I expect CONgress to have hearings on the how and why. That may buy a little time, but not much more than a month or two. Something will have to be done soon.

Since the post I was reading from u/Cajunmommabear38 was actually about Rand Paul saying Fauci was referred to DOJ for lying to CONgress, I'd say something is happening.

I also used this article for some of my research: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/protecting-us-government-leaders-security-analysis/story?id=66258938

I can't dig on this right now (at work) but I just heard the white house muppet in her press briefing say the White House is working to establish an Office of Pandemic Preparedness. I'm sure there will be sauce in a little while.

Scary part is she dropped that nonchalantly, and right before turning the briefing over to Mayorkis. Seems like what they do with a Friday afternoon drop - bury the stuff that could be big underneath something else when something big is already going on.

Why would they be working to set up a pandemic preparedness office in the White House now? What is coming, and how soon?

So This has been bothering me for about a week now. The US hit our $31.4T debt ceiling in January, and since then the Fed has been using "extraordinary measures" to continue govt operations. They say that will only last until somewhere around June before the US defaults. Supposedly the govt only spent $20-25B to bail out some of the depositors, and theoretically that money should have come from the roughly $128B the FDIC maintains in the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF). I also think they spent FAR MORE than they are telling us, but have zero evidence other than a gut feeling.

What I'm wondering is if that fund actually exists, or is it a bunch of post-it IOU notes in a drawer somewhere like they did with Social Security and Medicare, or even the US gold? If that kind of money is sitting around somewhere some Dem would use it to "combat climate change" or make treadmills for shrimp, or whatever the govt wastes our money on. I seriously doubt that money actually still exists (if it ever did).

Where did they get the $20-25B to hand over to the people who can't follow simple directions and only put the amount of money that is insured into the bank? Biden authorized that money (which he can't legally do anyway) and I think there is a good possibility that it was outside of the measures the Fed is using to buy time before we default.

Shouldn't this be a bigger deal and actually hit the mainstream news, assuming someone is actually paying attention? I know $25B won't go far, but what if they spent far more than that? What if there are other banks failing that the govt bailed out and kept under wraps "to quell panic"? What if the Fed had that $128B counted into their "extraordinary measures" fund to keep us from default? Remember - Wells Fargo had "issues" recently where people's paychecks disappeared from their accounts. Maybe that spurred the Fed to rescue them and they kept it secret.

Do we have anyone here who "watches the fed" (FedFags?) that can shed more light on this? Is it possible the bank runs were engineered to force the Republicans to bend to Biden and raise the debt limit with no cuts? I don't know, but something just doesn't seem right.

u/#q55

Elon reinstated Trump's Twitter account. Trump has said he will not post on Twitter anymore - just his own platform Truth Social. A number of you have remarked that because Trump was reinstated at least we will get to see not only all of his tweets again, but most importantly his tweets from January 6, 2020.

There are good reasons that those tweets are important, and the DS likely knew of those when they made the decision to deplatform him. The biggest reason is by Trump tweeting the tweets asking for calm and telling people to go home peacefully he fulfilled requirements necessary for him to sign the Insurrection Act.

By removing Trump's Twitter account the DS hid the evidence from the people, and thus hid the fact that Trump fulfilled those requirements. Fast-forward to the J6 trials now. There are only just over 6 weeks left until the new Congress starts, so the House only has a limited amount of time available under the Democrat majority to make their move before they lose control and the J6 farce is ended. They have to do something now or lose their chance forever.

What if their whole J6 show trial depended on the public never seeing Trump's J6 tweets? I think they were going to refer insurrection charges against Trump to the DOJ, and of course their POS AG would of course arrest Trump. Whether or not Trump even signed the Insurrection Act doesn't even matter - what matters is he told people to go home peacefully. That makes it really hard to claim he was fomenting an insurrection when he told the people exactly the opposite. Note - Trump may still be indicted on something else this new special prosecutor dreams up, but it won't be for insurrection.

Now - "Look to Twitter:". Nowhere in there does it say anything about a tweet. I think this part of the Q drop is actually similar to the whole "watch the water" or "Watch CA" things. What if Trump's Twitter account being reinstated is actually the signal we were waiting for?

The tweets being available again, specifically the J6 tweets, show Trump's innocence. They also show he could have signed the Insurrection Act if he wanted to (and maybe he did). They should also end the J6 farce. Unfortunately they will also probably force the DS hands to hurry up and get him arrested and unable to run again. This will have to be public since there is very little time for them to cover everything up. Things will undoubtedly get bad, with both sides going after each other. You might even say a storm is brewing...

I think Elon's actions at Twitter are actually what we were "looking to Twitter" for. The rest of the Q drop can be fulfilled anywhere by anyone, but I think it will be a speech/news conference from Trump where he says the phrase we've been waiting for - "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us.......".

I've been kicking around a theory all day today and decided to post it to see what you guys think. What if the cheating we know happened was Deep State uniparty cheating, and not just Democrat cheating?

I think it is possible that the DS decided to cheat in specific races, and plan it so that the Republicans would have a narrow majority in the House, but the Senate would stay tied. They would have their favorites elected of course - dems and reps - and then pick the extra Republicans as needed to give them a small majority. Then at the same time they would make sure the Senate stays tied so they still have the majority with Kamala's vote. This result would be trumpeted as proof that there was no election fraud because both sides won, and it wouldn't hurt the DS at all.

By doing that, the DS would give the Republicans the chance to have all the hearings and investigations they want, and even impeachments, with no danger of a Senate conviction. Besides - McCarthy (one of their guys) said he is not doing impeachments if he is elected Speaker.

The Republicans wouldn't get anything else done in the House, and nothing would come from the investigations of course. Then in 2 years the Democrats would be able to say that the Republicans had the House for 2 years, and the only thing they did was try to take political revenge on their enemies. The Democrats would decimate the Republicans in 2024 because the Republicans did nothing, and the Dems could cheat as much as they like because everyone by then will expect a blue wave. It would also likely reelect Joe or whatever person they put in his place when they 25th him next year. The Democrats would then declare a mandate from the people, and usher in everything they want like the Green New Deal, EVs, DC/Puerto Rico states, court packing, mandates, abortion legislation, gun confiscation, DEI/ESG/CRT - every woke thing they can dream up.

I don't know if this is what they are doing, but it would be a brilliant plan if they are. It would also complete the destruction of the US. I think a lot will depend on how the 4 outstanding Senate races go. If they split 2-2 or they win 3-1 the Senate will be Blue. I also think the Walker/Warnock GA race was severely messed with to ensure a runoff in December. This will allow them to see how bad they have to cheat and will give them a month to formulate a plan.

If this is what is happening things will get REALLY bad for us. I really hope the Trump announcement on the 15th is either announcing the storm, or announcing that we trapped them and SCOTUS reveals that they have already ruled in our favor. Otherwise the military is the only way.

I promised I would send an update about my daughter. Last month I asked for prayers when my pregnant daughter was on her way to the ER because she didn't feel the baby move for almost a day. Then I updated later on that everything was ok - when she ate, the baby started moving again.

The rest of the pregnancy was more of the same - 5 or 6 trips to the ER, but everything continued to be ok.

Today she finally made it to the day her doctor scheduled her to have a c-section. She had a healthy baby girl, 6lbs 8oz and 20" tall (I hate when they say "long"). Everything went just fine and both are resting. Visitor rules only allow 2 visitors so I visited for a little while and left so my son-in-law and my wife can stay. I stayed long enough to hold my first granddaughter for a bit, and headed home to take care of the dogs. By the way - based Texas hospital - no masks required.

Thanks again for all the prayers. I truly believe that helped a lot.

I posted last month about being worried about my pregnant, unfortunately vaxxed daughter. She's just under 34 weeks and is on her way to the ER because she hasn't felt the baby move since last night. Yesterday it was very active.

Any prayers you can spare are much appreciated. Thanks in advance. I'll update when I know more.

Today I was looking for some info on the Tylenol during pregnancy studies (alluded to here.)

Somehow I ended up in a really bizarre Reddit sub called ScienceBasedParenting. The sub is bad enough, but I saw this article with that OP asking about vaxxing her 4.5yr old kid. That's bad enough, but the comments in the post are horrifying. Parents getting it for their infants and toddlers, pregnant mothers getting boosted, breastfeeding mothers getting their boosters, doctors and nurses telling about getting it for their kids and how it is safer than covid. One mother even already had a baby die of "extreme prematurity with no warning signs" yet she is getting her current baby the second Pfizer shot tomorrow.

I know - Reddit - but these are allegedly real parents, doctors, and nurses out there. How can there still be so many people out there that are willing to give EUA poison to their infants and toddlers based on what the TV tells them? I hope these are just the 4-6% Q said would be lost forever, because if not we may still have a long way to go with red-pilling the normies.

BTW - there was a monkeypox thread as well with parents worried about their kids crawling and getting it, or gay guys getting discriminated against by MAGA people. Lots of fear there. We probably need to work harder red-pilling people (again?) before they go blindly into another scamdemic and blow all the work everyone has done in the last few years.

I argued with myself for a while before posting this because I wasn't sure if it would make a difference, but I decided that enough Anons would benefit and are probably in a similar position so why not. This isn't about vaccine shedding - it's about the stress we purebloods are under knowing that anything can happen to our friends and loved ones that took the shot. I was never worried about myself. I knew I would not take the shot.

My issue is that both of my young-adult daughters got the shot. One is a teacher and was forced to get it to keep her job. The youngest is married to a military man (keeping things general here). I'm worried about both, but for the purposes of this post I'll concentrate on my youngest. Her husband is assigned to a duty station that required dependents to get the shot in order to be allowed on the installation, so she got it even though she knew better and did not want it. Fast-forward to now - she is roughly 6 months pregnant. So far everything is going ok. I of course worry every day about the baby because I'm terrified that her 1 shot will harm the baby or put her into early labor. Incidentally I'm also worried that my older daughter will never be able to have a baby thanks to the shot(s) that she took. I think she has 1 booster.

It hit me earlier today that even though I am worried about friends and family that took the shot, my youngest daughter is the one that is stressing me out. Think about it - we think people that got the shot(s) may not be here in 5-8 years based on what we've heard or read, but a pregnancy has a finite length. Every day is like knowing your company is in trouble and going to lay 50 percent of the people off in the near future but you don't know if it is today or in 3 months, and you don't know if it will be new-hires or senior people with higher pay. You will worry about that every day. It's actually worse for us Anons though, because we get our news from different places and we know the stuff the MSM covered up about the shots. Pretty much ties directly in with the whole red-pill/blue-pill thing. Most normies might not even know.

The only thing I can do is trust God that things will be ok, and hope that some day all those responsible will be brought to justice. I do have one special hope though. I'm hoping that the person/people that chose to rely on the testing on pregnant rats instead of humans will have a special punishment. I know what I'm personally rooting for, but regardless of the punishment I would like the judge(s) to withhold sentencing (when those guys are convicted) for between 6-9 months so they can go through the same stress that people like us are going through. Let them worry every day if today will be the day, and will they live or die.

I'm sure we will all get through this one way or another, but typing this out actually helped me deal with this. Hopefully it helps some of you.

I am not a lawyer, but I think there is a fair amount of them in here. All this talk recently about the SCOTUS EPA ruling got me thinking. Then today we had a victory - of sorts. It is a good ruling, but it won't immediately eliminate or reign-in any of the other agencies that are ruling over us and/or stealing from us. It may help us but it is likely a long, drawn-out process, concentrating on them one-at-a-time.

I have a theory. I was tossing around ideas trying to figure out how to hurry the process up, and thought it would be great if we could sue Congress to force them to do their jobs. Of course we can't do that thanks to sovereign immunity. But - it hit me. These agencies like EPA, The Fed, FBI, CIA, CDC, FDA, DOE (both of them), etc. are not Congress. They are making up their own rules and regulations, making policy, and even fining or jailing us but according to this ruling it appears they have no authority. I don't believe they have sovereign immunity.

What if hundreds of thousands of people joined together in class action suits against these agencies to force Congress to either codify the agency actions, or shut them down? Companies could even join in based on their industry interests.

Imagine if there were 20 suits going on at the same time against 20 different agencies. I'm not sure the government could even handle that. If they were filed in federal courts is it possible they could all be fast-tracked to SCOTUS? They would all be very similar, and some of them might even be merged with other cases because of the chaos this would cause.

The end game could be multiple outcomes. Either the suits make their way up and are accepted, or one of the courts on the way up gets mad enough that they force Congress to act on all of them. Either way, the process would hopefully be much faster than going one agency at a time.

What do you think - am I crazy or is my theory possible?