Legal pursuant to what? “Under attack” in what sense?

The electors appointed by the states met and chose a president. There’s nothing in the constitution or statute law that makes it legal for the military to ignore the courts and the president chosen by the electorate college in order to take matters into their own hands.

That doesn’t mean that it might not make sense under certain circumstances, but it certainly wouldn’t be legal.

You keep dodging the question. Under which circumstances would you conclude that you had been wrong all along?

So you're stating that your claims are unfalsifiable? It's impossible for them to be wrong?

Under what circumstances would you conclude that you were wrong? What specific thing or sets of things would falsify your claims?

It is

I mean, this is also true for the paranoid schizos who think God has commanded them to kill schoolteachers or whatever

It wouldn’t be legal; it might be their duty, but that isn’t true as a matter of law.

I must say your trolling is entertaining, though it’s a bit too on the nose. Though maybe that’s the point

You do know that wind and solar are the devil way ? Oil is made in heaven by Jesus, you are a demon

I read somewhere that around 60 per cent of our taxes go directly to (((them))) in different ways, can’t remember the sauce but it was tots legit

How dare you tell the truth !!!! This is not what we do here you demon !

Gems

Op is a larping troll, see his post history.

Actually, from your post history, you’re a confirmed troll

So it is impossible that this is not in fact a show? That is the only rational interpretation of the totality of the data?

Under what circumstances would you conclude that you were wrong? What specific thing or sets of things would falsify your claims?

Shame he let the Soviet Union exist and kill people for more than seven decades.

Your ‘known fact’ isn’t remotely reassuring

So under what conditions do we know that this statement is false? What are its truth-conditions?

How would you know if things weren’t going according to the plan?

lmao what the fuck are you going to do?

evidence couldn't be presented in lower courts because they had to save it for the supreme court

This makes no sense. SCOTUS only reviews evidence in cases in which it has original jurisdiction.

There’s no evidence the US military is going to do anything at all

It was functionally 9-0.

Don’t be silly. The military is going to save the day. Eventually. We just need to wait. And enjoy the show. No matter how horrifying the show is.

Wait. And enjoy it. Because eventually something will happen. Because it’s impossible that things other than what we want will turn out to be the case.

There is nothing to learn. There is no statutory basis for such a case; no such case will succeed.

Thanks for calling me childish

You want to be able to force your preferences on other people on their property. That’s childish. No masks, no service is no different to no shoes, no shirt, no service.

However have any of these cases went to trial yet? Have you tried any cases yourself? That’s a pretty bold statement seeing as you have no data only opinion to back up your responses.

What? Which cases? Gone to trial for what? There is no general right to religious freedom in private establishments. Can you even cite the statutory basis for such a lawsuit?

I’m a lawyer. None of those establishments are generally forced to allow non-masked patrons for religious reasons.

I am here because I am committed to liberty, including the liberty of private establishments to refuse service for whatever reasons they might choose, whether or not those reasons are intelligent or not. Masks are stupid, but this idea that you have the right to do whatever you feel like on other folks’ property is childish at best.

Kavanaugh didn’t say any of this. The style is completely off. It’s all bullshit and that should be obvious to you.

The only stupid people are those who believe thid article is real.

Rights? There is no right to shop in a private establishment in contravention of that establishment’s policies, even if the policies are stupid.