You read my mind... if scotus suddenly becomes "pro Trump" my antenna goes up and I immediately start looking for the hidden agenda... which to me is "we gotta stop this before trump brings all our corruption to light..."
Ah, you have a very valid point. Now that they have presented the prosecution's side, I wouldn't be surprised if they stop it tomorrow because of this statement.
Although, in defense of any genuine-intentioned follow-on posters, the ability to search prior posts on this site is fairly crap, for two main reasons I see:
too many people type in ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS post titles (mostly of the "oh, look at me, I'm being so cute and cryptic!" vein)
Search only seems to search the title field, and not the body of the message
Feature request: It shouldn't be too hard to implement an alert when posting a link similar to one already posted by comparing the text behind the inputted link to the text behind prior-posted links.
I searched part of the quote and just found other random sites reposting this whole article line-for-line. I can't find any opinions on SCOTUS' website relating to Trump profiting in the oval office either. Pretty sure this is entirely fabrication.
Great... except that the Supreme Court hasn't exactly stepped in to stop the proceedings, now have they? They've had ample opportunity... but no action.
The same thing with the Election Fraud. The Supreme Court had ample opportunity to hear cases of coordinated voter fraud and election theft... but they have chosen to ignore it.
I don't want to hear any "righteous indignation" from any of these Supreme Court embarrassments. YOU failed our nation several times recently... so don't start claiming to care now.
SCOTUS has absolutely no power to step in, its all Commiegress. By law.
Kavanaugh, -IF- he made the statement, and that's how it reads, commented on one of the on-going cases, someone just "inferred" that Kavanaugh ALSO meant to say this in regard to the impeachment.
Read the article, carefully. Doesn't matter in the end, its not up to SCOTUS in any way to start, stop or delay an impeachment, they are just observers by SCOTUS blog on the issue.
100% this. SCOTUS cannot do anything to affect the proceedings. They have no enforcement power, they have no intercession power. A judge cannot round up all the bailiffs and go arrest people, or do anything.
They render opinions on cases they put before themselves. THAT IS IT.
Anyone saying otherwise is doing it for show, for ignorant citizens who think they have any other powers.
I see this as very bad news, supporting Demoncrats.
Not sure I see it as "bad news", if I read the article correctly. To my eye, and thought, and as I already said IF this even took place, its Kavanaugh telling libtards to stop filing lawsuits against Trump (one investigation still going on in NYC, need to research what else may be in play, still). As of now, and before we see some opinions rendered in the upcoming docketed cases, I am hoping the 3 "conservatives" will stick to the Constitution, thus I am giving Kavanaugh a pass on this one until we figure out where he stands.
I’m not so sure. I am not a scotus justice or constitutional scholar, but the Texas case seemed like it had real legs. I was shocked when they turned it down. Seemed to be a procedural reason of filing under Article 2 vs 3, so I was also surprised TX didn’t re-file the case appropriately. Anyways I think if Trump put 3 justices on and couldn’t get any of them to agree to hear any case, there’s some reason for that. It could be part of the plan or he could have picked 3 bad justices, I’m pretty sure it’s the plan.
Trump nominated 3 justices that were selected by McConnell and some bullshit deep state front group, who's name currently escapes me. He would have been better leaving the seats empty than filling them with deep state stooges.
Federalist Society I think it is, maybe you’re right, in which case the military is the only way. If Roberts has done what Lin Wood says he has, then that presents another good reason to use tribunals instead of civil courts including SCOTUS. Hopefully we are covered either way
Makes me wonder why now when Dems are wrapping up and right before the defense gets started and not 3 days ago when they voted. Sounds like some damning evidence coming that might just drop them all.
i don't think that's real, is it? I went over and read it but I didn't see any chain of authority from news, nothing so I wasn't sure what is going on with it.
Did you read it, though? It's an awfully partisan statement to be coming out of the mouth of a supposed non-partisan branch of govt.
I wanna believe, but if this were anywhere near legit, you KNOW the media would be screaming like banshees about Kavanagh being a shill for Trump, and calling for his removal.
In fact this would be enough for biden and the rest of the cabal puppets to claim that all Trump appointed scotus justices should resign because they're too loyal to Trump.
This certainly apears to be yet another example of some poster dumping fake news here, and thoroughly embarrassing us by getting doots through the roof from all the desperate gullibles here.
All I see is a way for the Dems to back out of the impeachment BEFORE President Trump has a chance to present his defense. I bet the dems conveniently decode to heed Kavanaugh's warning just as they are done presenting their case.
This isn’t welcomed now... it would’ve been welcomed BEFORE demoncrats just spent three days crying and forcing a blatant, bullshit narrative.. fuck Kavanagh, fuck Barrett, fuck Gorsuch... all three had opportunities to do the right thing and this is just another way to jab a finger in the eyes of every patriot awaiting the defense of our beloved President Donald J Trump. It is yet ANOTHER way to censor the truth. Fuck SCROTUS.
Maybe, but I, personally, think we'll discover before this is all over that they (at least 5 of them) were indeed onboard with/apprised of "the plan", or at least part of it.
Otherwise, as with so much that we've seen, their actions just. don't. make. sense. (Kavanaugh, after the disgusting spectacle he went through? Gorshuch? Amy Barrett? I could see how maybe they could have all been Mitch's bitches, although that's almost beyond belief. But Thomas, and Alito, for them to have still said nothing?!?! When the Dems were opening planning to stuff the Supreme Court?!? No way. They know what's going on.)
So we'll see, but remain open to that possibility that at least 5 of the SC are not traitors. Don't let hate consume you prematurely. ?
I will GLADLY retract my statement publicly if/when it all comes out in the wash, and they prove to be for the positive. I’ve too, thought they have been part of the plan, but then I go back and forth with the fact that they are there to rule honestly. No if, ands, or buts about it. If they are apart of the plan and they ruled unjustly, for the sake of a plan (whether it’s for good or not) doesn’t that still go against what the highest court judges are sworn to do? If they believe this was unjust in anyway and could have acted on it should they have? Or vote the opposite for “optics”? A lie is a lie is a lie. Whether you lie for good or lie for bad. And if they will lie for either, in my opinion, it loses the faith of the people. How can you trust that anything they rule for or against from that point on, is actually what they stand for or “is there some back door plan behind this ruling?” Don’t get me wrong, I pray Trump exposes everyone and everything evil about our corrupt government and rightfully takes his seat as the TRUE president of the USA but I just can’t see where lying for the greater good works in our favor. My opinion only. Obviously I’m human and I may be completely wrong. Lol I do have a lot of anger built up (I am tired of the BS) and you’re right I should not let it consume me! But thanks for the kind response fren!
Even IF the SCOTUS ends the trial (which I don't believe they have, or will) wouldn't that be a denial of POTUS's due process? The commiecrats have thrown down the gauntlet; it's POTUS's right to pick it up and bitch-slap them across the face with it.
Afterwards, if SCOTUS wants to pursue prosecution of those who perpetrated this illegal activity, I'll grab a front-row seat.
I really don't think he would use the word "bullshit" when discussing court business. This smells fake and they show it by going to far over the top. Not to mention that there are no other sources than this one. There's not even an author's name in the arti le. Come on guys we need real sources.
That is not how I read the article, there is no mention of the Capital Riot, and not discernible date of the publishing of the article...Correct me if I am wrong...
A) Kavanaugh seems like a good one.
B) I don't see how it is bad news at all...
Actually, it sounds like we
HAVE THEM BY THEIR BALLS:
Kavanaugh said WE (not 'I') have reviewed the impeachment and WE find it grossly illegal = the dirty demonrats CAN NOT impeach him as an illegal trial is not a trial.
THEIR ATTEMPT to impeach theDonald is illegal... DEMS are engaging in illegal acts
[supposedly] Friday is the day that Trump's team goes on offense
-if the SC hasn't stopped it today, which they haven't, chances are tomorrow's trial will still take place
and
If Trump's PROSECUTION lawyers go in HARD in on Friday before SCOTUS spanks congress...that would be a DELICIOUS play.
In any case the are still having an invalid ? court of a trial.
Ive heard President Trump was really pissed after day 1 of his lame lawyers first go around. I am sure he set them down and said ok mfers now this is what your going to do if you wanna get paid.....right before he smacked them with those brass balls.....lol
I suspect this is fake news. Just went to the site, and it's filled with tons of click bait and stuff. It has no sources within the article. Looking at the "quotes" attributed to Justice Kavanaugh, they appear highly suspicious and not likely said by him. Well, this is my opinion for what's it's worth.
Stop it now before Trump gets a chance at his defense.
Sounds about right. Democrats get 3 days to publicly slam him and then they'll call it off. Would not surprise me.
Shit, that would be just their style
Why didn't this happen 3 days ago? Now that the D's are finished and it's the turn of POTUS Trump's lawyers?
I hope Trump's lawyers don't stop and continue as planned.
Precisely. The timing is highly suspect.
Posted this a couple other times but this article is fake news.
And watch as no one talks about it cause circling back to it takes 4 years.
Don’t worry, this article is BS.
There’s no source and they have quoted Kavanaugh as saying “bullshit” (absolutely would not happen).
100% fake news.
You read my mind... if scotus suddenly becomes "pro Trump" my antenna goes up and I immediately start looking for the hidden agenda... which to me is "we gotta stop this before trump brings all our corruption to light..."
Just like when MSM didn't even air the Senate's/Trump rebuttal during the first attempt at peachmint. Corrupt cowards they are
Ah, you have a very valid point. Now that they have presented the prosecution's side, I wouldn't be surprised if they stop it tomorrow because of this statement.
This the only source?
If it shows up anywhere else in the press, there will be 10 more posts about it in the next hour ?
Oh, it probably won't even take that.
Although, in defense of any genuine-intentioned follow-on posters, the ability to search prior posts on this site is fairly crap, for two main reasons I see:
too many people type in ABSOLUTELY WORTHLESS post titles (mostly of the "oh, look at me, I'm being so cute and cryptic!" vein)
Search only seems to search the title field, and not the body of the message
Feature request: It shouldn't be too hard to implement an alert when posting a link similar to one already posted by comparing the text behind the inputted link to the text behind prior-posted links.
Agreed. Titles are simply abysmal lately...
And then proceeds to post the same article that others have posted with equally abysmal titles.
It's impossible to search using titles like these.
Or it’s just a string of emojis
I'd like to see verification too
SAME
I searched part of the quote and just found other random sites reposting this whole article line-for-line. I can't find any opinions on SCOTUS' website relating to Trump profiting in the oval office either. Pretty sure this is entirely fabrication.
Yeah, his use of the terms "bullshit" and "Democrat" Party reek of fakery to me.
No offense, but if he had really said this it would be the top news story.
Yeah, I’m finding it very hard to believe Kavanaugh would make a statement where he says “bullshit”.
But this article appears to be bullshit.
Great... except that the Supreme Court hasn't exactly stepped in to stop the proceedings, now have they? They've had ample opportunity... but no action.
The same thing with the Election Fraud. The Supreme Court had ample opportunity to hear cases of coordinated voter fraud and election theft... but they have chosen to ignore it.
I don't want to hear any "righteous indignation" from any of these Supreme Court embarrassments. YOU failed our nation several times recently... so don't start claiming to care now.
SCOTUS has absolutely no power to step in, its all Commiegress. By law.
Kavanaugh, -IF- he made the statement, and that's how it reads, commented on one of the on-going cases, someone just "inferred" that Kavanaugh ALSO meant to say this in regard to the impeachment.
Read the article, carefully. Doesn't matter in the end, its not up to SCOTUS in any way to start, stop or delay an impeachment, they are just observers by SCOTUS blog on the issue.
100% this. SCOTUS cannot do anything to affect the proceedings. They have no enforcement power, they have no intercession power. A judge cannot round up all the bailiffs and go arrest people, or do anything. They render opinions on cases they put before themselves. THAT IS IT.
Anyone saying otherwise is doing it for show, for ignorant citizens who think they have any other powers.
I see this as very bad news, supporting Demoncrats.
Not sure I see it as "bad news", if I read the article correctly. To my eye, and thought, and as I already said IF this even took place, its Kavanaugh telling libtards to stop filing lawsuits against Trump (one investigation still going on in NYC, need to research what else may be in play, still). As of now, and before we see some opinions rendered in the upcoming docketed cases, I am hoping the 3 "conservatives" will stick to the Constitution, thus I am giving Kavanaugh a pass on this one until we figure out where he stands.
I’m not so sure. I am not a scotus justice or constitutional scholar, but the Texas case seemed like it had real legs. I was shocked when they turned it down. Seemed to be a procedural reason of filing under Article 2 vs 3, so I was also surprised TX didn’t re-file the case appropriately. Anyways I think if Trump put 3 justices on and couldn’t get any of them to agree to hear any case, there’s some reason for that. It could be part of the plan or he could have picked 3 bad justices, I’m pretty sure it’s the plan.
Trump nominated 3 justices that were selected by McConnell and some bullshit deep state front group, who's name currently escapes me. He would have been better leaving the seats empty than filling them with deep state stooges.
Federalist Society I think it is, maybe you’re right, in which case the military is the only way. If Roberts has done what Lin Wood says he has, then that presents another good reason to use tribunals instead of civil courts including SCOTUS. Hopefully we are covered either way
Can't have preconditions for nomination. I will bet this was covered in the hearings.
Makes me wonder why now when Dems are wrapping up and right before the defense gets started and not 3 days ago when they voted. Sounds like some damning evidence coming that might just drop them all.
Just replied this ... now noticing you thought the same. Real or not ... it may be stopped tomorrow.
Proof he said this? Is this legit?
Sounds like bullshit.
No other sauces...
Not legit. Shit posts like this is why the site lacks credibility.
There's no byline or date. Probably not true.
i don't think that's real, is it? I went over and read it but I didn't see any chain of authority from news, nothing so I wasn't sure what is going on with it.
Did you read it, though? It's an awfully partisan statement to be coming out of the mouth of a supposed non-partisan branch of govt.
I wanna believe, but if this were anywhere near legit, you KNOW the media would be screaming like banshees about Kavanagh being a shill for Trump, and calling for his removal.
In fact this would be enough for biden and the rest of the cabal puppets to claim that all Trump appointed scotus justices should resign because they're too loyal to Trump.
Yeah... except for this is likely 100% fake news.
Right, agree. That's what I was suggesting in my comment.
Yes.
Sorry that my comment suggested you were one of the suckers who got suckered by the fake news.
Indeed, you were not.
You were spot on with your take.
?
No need to apologize, all good! I was just clarifying!
If this article is accurate... President Trump is walking these idiots right into the SCOTUS...
"these people are stupid"
The only stupid people are those who believe thid article is real.
Yeah i couldnt confirm he said anything like this. None of those "quotes" are found anywhere else.
We sure of this source? There’s literally a dick in the ads? Lmao
I think your skepticism is warranted.
This certainly apears to be yet another example of some poster dumping fake news here, and thoroughly embarrassing us by getting doots through the roof from all the desperate gullibles here.
We have to be better than this.
100% agree.
Use common sense frens!!!!! Don’t be stupid.
All I see is a way for the Dems to back out of the impeachment BEFORE President Trump has a chance to present his defense. I bet the dems conveniently decode to heed Kavanaugh's warning just as they are done presenting their case.
this story has no date and no author,,,, BULLSHIT
I've never heard of a Supreme Court Justice using the word bullshit from the bench. But maybe I'm not up on the latest legal terminology.
This story is almost certainly fake.
yes its right between asshat and cocksuckers....and before fuck off and die
who the hell is USMAGSPRESS?
More fake news.
It's the latest shill technique.
They're succeeding in making us look like fools here.
This article looks fake. Nothing else reporting anything like this. Sus at best.
They want to stop Trumps team presenting evidence.
I want to hear his lawyers' evidence
Interesting. Now if SCOTUS accepts the cases and correct the miscarriage of a stolen election
This seems fake
"bullshit"
"Democrat" Party
"We'll stop it for you" when there's no such power granted SCOTUS
Doesn't seem like Kav would write this
Noice. A voice of reason, finally.
This isn’t welcomed now... it would’ve been welcomed BEFORE demoncrats just spent three days crying and forcing a blatant, bullshit narrative.. fuck Kavanagh, fuck Barrett, fuck Gorsuch... all three had opportunities to do the right thing and this is just another way to jab a finger in the eyes of every patriot awaiting the defense of our beloved President Donald J Trump. It is yet ANOTHER way to censor the truth. Fuck SCROTUS.
It's almost certainly fake.
Either way. Fuck SCROTUS.
Maybe, but I, personally, think we'll discover before this is all over that they (at least 5 of them) were indeed onboard with/apprised of "the plan", or at least part of it.
Otherwise, as with so much that we've seen, their actions just. don't. make. sense. (Kavanaugh, after the disgusting spectacle he went through? Gorshuch? Amy Barrett? I could see how maybe they could have all been Mitch's bitches, although that's almost beyond belief. But Thomas, and Alito, for them to have still said nothing?!?! When the Dems were opening planning to stuff the Supreme Court?!? No way. They know what's going on.)
So we'll see, but remain open to that possibility that at least 5 of the SC are not traitors. Don't let hate consume you prematurely. ?
I will GLADLY retract my statement publicly if/when it all comes out in the wash, and they prove to be for the positive. I’ve too, thought they have been part of the plan, but then I go back and forth with the fact that they are there to rule honestly. No if, ands, or buts about it. If they are apart of the plan and they ruled unjustly, for the sake of a plan (whether it’s for good or not) doesn’t that still go against what the highest court judges are sworn to do? If they believe this was unjust in anyway and could have acted on it should they have? Or vote the opposite for “optics”? A lie is a lie is a lie. Whether you lie for good or lie for bad. And if they will lie for either, in my opinion, it loses the faith of the people. How can you trust that anything they rule for or against from that point on, is actually what they stand for or “is there some back door plan behind this ruling?” Don’t get me wrong, I pray Trump exposes everyone and everything evil about our corrupt government and rightfully takes his seat as the TRUE president of the USA but I just can’t see where lying for the greater good works in our favor. My opinion only. Obviously I’m human and I may be completely wrong. Lol I do have a lot of anger built up (I am tired of the BS) and you’re right I should not let it consume me! But thanks for the kind response fren!
I’m right there with you, with those same arguments battling in my head for my current opinion.
And you articulated them very well. Thank you!
Even IF the SCOTUS ends the trial (which I don't believe they have, or will) wouldn't that be a denial of POTUS's due process? The commiecrats have thrown down the gauntlet; it's POTUS's right to pick it up and bitch-slap them across the face with it. Afterwards, if SCOTUS wants to pursue prosecution of those who perpetrated this illegal activity, I'll grab a front-row seat.
NCSWIC...
It's almost certainly fake.
100% Fake news. Why post this bull shit?
I really don't think he would use the word "bullshit" when discussing court business. This smells fake and they show it by going to far over the top. Not to mention that there are no other sources than this one. There's not even an author's name in the arti le. Come on guys we need real sources.
This is a reference to another "lawsuit" concerning President Trump "profiting" off of his position as POTUS and not the current impeachment...
That is not how I read the article, there is no mention of the Capital Riot, and not discernible date of the publishing of the article...Correct me if I am wrong...
Why put something in quotes that wasn’t said?
Fake news.
This is not welcome.
This could kill Trump's chance to present anything while leaving the left fully in control of the narrative.
It's almost certainly fake.
Woulda been nice to see that kinda fire BEFORE the republic fell...
A) Kavanaugh seems like a good one. B) I don't see how it is bad news at all...
Actually, it sounds like we HAVE THEM BY THEIR BALLS:
Kavanaugh said WE (not 'I') have reviewed the impeachment and WE find it grossly illegal = the dirty demonrats CAN NOT impeach him as an illegal trial is not a trial.
THEIR ATTEMPT to impeach theDonald is illegal... DEMS are engaging in illegal acts
[supposedly] Friday is the day that Trump's team goes on offense
-if the SC hasn't stopped it today, which they haven't, chances are tomorrow's trial will still take place
and
In any case the are still having an invalid ? court of a trial.
Kavanaugh didn’t say any of this. The style is completely off. It’s all bullshit and that should be obvious to you.
Ive heard President Trump was really pissed after day 1 of his lame lawyers first go around. I am sure he set them down and said ok mfers now this is what your going to do if you wanna get paid.....right before he smacked them with those brass balls.....lol
Expect bigger and bluer BALLS
Based on what we’ve seen of ThePresident’s lawyers, they suck.
He won’t be impeached, but nothing comes of this.
Don’t stop it before Trump gets to present the truth.
Media will not show it.
How do we know he said this?
I suspect this is fake news. Just went to the site, and it's filled with tons of click bait and stuff. It has no sources within the article. Looking at the "quotes" attributed to Justice Kavanaugh, they appear highly suspicious and not likely said by him. Well, this is my opinion for what's it's worth.
I am not finding any corroboration that these are real Kavanaugh quotes.
Well glad to see that I had thought the entire supreme court turned against him.
This story is almost certainly fake.