8
fluffmiceter 8 points ago +8 / -0

Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you look at it), thedonald has grown so much in the past few months that a majority of its users are now normies. There has been a very noticeable shift in culture this past year.

Let's just say that the thedonald (back on reddit), which played a key+supporting role in investigating, discussing and dispersing information about pizzagate, wikileaks and whatnot as they were unfolding, is not the same as the thedonald we have today on .win. It is what it is. If pizzagate were to begin coming to light today, most of it would be shut down by other users, calling it a distraction plot and looney conspiracy theories. Then, anyone who was interested would be pushed off into their own corner of the internet.

That's okay though, there are other channels of the internet for discussing these kinds of unpopular, world view-shattering developments. thedonald.win plays a crucial role in bringing lots and lots of new people on board, who can then share the truth with their families and friends (something that we most definitely saw a lot of, looking at you based Florida hispanics 0_0)

by Jotoku
9
fluffmiceter 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh my goodness, right on! Notice how on the left and right of Trump, there appears to be a white halo effect. It's most noticeable if you look at the beige colored wall running behind Trump, and observe how the beige color mysteriously shifts towards white when near Trump. This halo also moves as Trump moves.

I think Trump is not in the white house. I think the team is operating from a secure military base somewhere, and for good reason. This is really the last chance for the deep state to stop him, and they are trying desperately. Of course, we will never hear of these attempts; we would only possibly learn of them if they were to succeed (which they won't).

1
fluffmiceter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Accept our rules or get fucked. We don’t have time for idiots like you to be spamming every post with HURR DURR JEWISH CONSPIRACY KIKES NIGGERS BLAH BLAH BLAH

5
fluffmiceter 5 points ago +5 / -0

By the way, you can say faggot around here. It’s one of those weird one exception rules, where your typical slur is a no go but for some reason all of us use faggot in various ways (but not to attack real faggots, though faggot is sometimes used in an endearing way towards any gay patriots)

3
fluffmiceter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Does anyone know what this is talking about? I’m still puzzled by how Trump suddenly stopped talking about HCQ and then began pushing for free vaccines and whatnot. What is the strategic play here? I can’t be the only one who is at least mildly concerned about this new vaccine, right?

0
fluffmiceter 0 points ago +0 / -0

Oh nooooo I can’t talk about “niggers” and “kikes”?!? This is literally fascism!11!1!

Grow the fuck up. Different turf, different rules. Accept them or get lost.

3
fluffmiceter 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder if the rumors of Pence trying to overthrow Trump and that mysterious envelope handed to Pence at the Bush funeral was to confuse the deep state. If it's confusing some of us patriots on whether Pence is for us or for them, then surely it confuses the deep state too.

5
fluffmiceter 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sorry bud, rules are different around here. If you wanna chat about Q drops then you keep those words out of your mouth. Otherwise you're gonna have to find some other refuge.

by reynard
3
fluffmiceter 3 points ago +3 / -0

When they hear the mention of Q, it triggers some deep seated fight or flight response. I don’t know if they fear the unknown and are afraid to look, or they fear being characterized by the media as the equivalent of flat earthers or moon landing truthers.

5
fluffmiceter 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have reasons to believe that we do. Just look at how Lin Wood is playfully hinting at this.

5
fluffmiceter 5 points ago +5 / -0

People are already starting to wake up and realize "holy shit, stuff is happening". Of course there are those who still insist that absolutely nothing ever happens behind the scenes, and they all legitimately think Barr stayed in for how long and got absolutely nothing done, yet Trump didn't get rid of him and now that he's leaving, Trump is saying positive things about him. I don't know how someone can look at this and say "yeah, theres 100% absolutely nothing that Barr did behind the scenes". I look at this and say, whether or not Barr is on our side, he played a purpose and he is now done with his duty, so he's leaving.

1
fluffmiceter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nothing of value lost. Just some angry shill calling us pieces of human trash.

4
fluffmiceter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ahahahaha you are gonna suck those words so hard in due time. Enjoy! I can see you are quite aggravated already.

7
fluffmiceter 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think whatever this "show" is that Q mentions, it's only just getting started. I have no idea what it is, perhaps some kind of military conflict that reveals to everyone that we are literally at war with China? It's gonna look really bad and terrifying for the public, but it's gonna be necessary. Some level of physical conflict with China is my bet.

4
fluffmiceter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Alright buddy now you just gave yourself away. Obvious shill is obvious. Don't come back here.

6
fluffmiceter 6 points ago +6 / -0

Only one post on that account of yours. I'm gonna just assume you're a shill. If you're not, just sit tight. Things are about to get rough!

11
fluffmiceter 11 points ago +11 / -0

Would add up with Pence saying just a day or so ago that they found the plug and they are going to pull it.

2
fluffmiceter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think Alex Jones is on our side. Millie Weaver may be a flawed person, I haven't read into her past, but I think her splitting from AJ and then tweeting WWG1WGA says quite a lot. Do you think she's a grifter hopping from host to host, and her next target is us? I feel like that is what you implied.

6
fluffmiceter 6 points ago +6 / -0

It takes massive balls or immense trust in the military and the secret service to go anywhere as the #1 wanted man on planet Earth. I can't even imagine walking outside, let alone flying on an aircraft that is being fired upon.

2
fluffmiceter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wow, you guys certainly are pathetic. Who sent you here?

14
fluffmiceter 14 points ago +14 / -0

FUCK FOX! The only person worth watching on Fox is Tucker Carlson, and the network knows that if they lose him they'll lose a shit ton of viewers. I think Tucker should leave Fox, that place is wretched just like the rest of the media.

9
fluffmiceter 9 points ago +9 / -0

Hahahahahaha it really did happen just as we expected. And damn, they didn't even have the patience to wait a few days to make this "attack" seem realistic. These deep state goons want to play chess but really they need to be practicing checkers. Or maybe even rock paper scissors.

4
fluffmiceter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Interesting but I don't think the deep state would go that deep in planning this attack. They aren't interested in convincing us that the attack was real; they only care about convincing your typical normie. As long as they can censor all discussions brought up by us around the legitimacy of the attack, they can get away with it.

Of course, this comes with the consequence that if a normie does stumble on our counter-intel and realizes that the media lied about said attack, they would stop trusting the media forever. The media and the Democrats have been pulling this same tactic for the last 4 years and every time, they bleed some of their normie supporters. I suppose when truth isn't on your side, it's difficult to set up a false flag and make it completely solid.

8
fluffmiceter 8 points ago +8 / -0

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought the first Q post was in late 2017. That would mean the timeline he was referring to, specifically the 4 years part, is about the stuff the radical left has been doing to cities, which makes sense in context.

Good analysis but I do not think he was talking about the history of the Q movement because that would slightly contradict his stance on plausible deniability.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›