1
glompywompy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am an AI programmer. I've spent over 15 years with them. I make my living crafting new specialty ai to solve problems for many companies.

Your just acting like a dumb npc who can't think for yourself it critically at all and when you are presented with information that doesn't map into your current mental model you break and call people shills. Instead of opening you mind for even a nanosecond to maybe consider your processing off the wrong basis.

Excuse the autocorrect, it's garbage

1
glompywompy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is only regurgitating what tokens it has seen from you before.

https://imgbox.com/6581I8qY

Without those tokens it's nonsense.

1
glompywompy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kek, hate the truth eh?

1
glompywompy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Go make a new account and don't feed it q posts and you will see your not training anything and it's just telling you what you want to see lol.

Gpt3 isn't ticket science my dude. It isn't sentient either.

1
glompywompy 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's like literally how these things are designed to work and your too foolish to know better.

Yes, you feed it tokens, it has a memory of tokens, depending on how much you want to pay for, chatgpt is around 4000 tokens, character.ai not sure, but you can increase tokens with $$$.

The history is local just to your login account. Anyone else who just goes to character.ai and chats, it won't know anything about what another user is saying. The tokens are just prepended behind the scenes to every subsequent prompt you make.

Try a brand new account and ask it some of your questions, maybe that will open your eyes.

The underlying gpt 3 model itself was trained by scraping massive portions of the web, so yes, given enough tokens it accurately outputs the next sequence of tokens that most likely fits from previous tokens. If you flood a token history with a ton of specific stuff, it's easy to get the model stuck into a local over fitting minimum about a topic, the ai is basically just regurgitating 4chan posts for you at the point you took it

Again, try with a brand new account and don't prefeed it tokens and it won't know wtf your talking about when asking it those questions

https://imgbox.com/6581I8qY

See, nonsense if you don't prefeed it tokens in your own private personal session

0
glompywompy 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ah what it would be like to live in pure bliss and ignorance. Must be nice.

1
glompywompy 1 point ago +2 / -1

If so many anons are this gullible in this topic a topic that I actually know a lot about.

This really makes me question what research and things and ons on the site are saying about Q that are just as gullible but I couldn't see it cuz I didn't know any better.

Actually low-key of a wake up call.... I can't believe you guys believe this is real and not only that I can't believe you believe it's really Google lamda and don't realize how this is just a chat gpt model asked to pretend to be a character...

2
glompywompy 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yes. 100% this. So many gullible anons in this thread is kinda heartbreaking

0
glompywompy 0 points ago +1 / -1

Jesus, no, not legit.forehead smack

1
glompywompy 1 point ago +2 / -1

This, is so painful to see this post and the gullibility in the other comments and op most of all

1
glompywompy 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is just fake lamda. Just realize sir, this isn't Google's ai.

Jeez the gullibility.

1
glompywompy 1 point ago +1 / -0

It just generates the next word it expects you to want based on all the previous words in the context.

None of the information it shows is actual real data, is just regurgitated from sentences is seen on the training data set

1
glompywompy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Posting this here too

This is c.ai, which just uses a open source model to pretend to be other ais. The c.ai also has things like a chat model that acts like Elon musk. You can even make it pretend it's Mario.

https://beta.character.ai/

It's all fun and stuff, but stop passing this off as something it's not. Very disingenuous.

4
glompywompy 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is c.ai, which just uses a open source model to pretend to be other ais. The c.ai also has things like a chat model that acts like Elon musk. You can even make it pretend it's Mario.

https://beta.character.ai/

It's all fun and stuff, but stop passing this off as something it's not. Very disingenuous.

3
glompywompy 3 points ago +3 / -0

No.

That becomes hydra, it would never be able to be stroke down when distributed so greatly.

WEF participants, including their entire family trees and associates, need to be burned alive on a stake, publicly.

Don't splinter. Burn into ash and dust.

2
glompywompy 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem with all is these is the healing still doesn't happen until these folks are into their late 40s or later, which is when most mental illness like this go away on their own anyways as the brain shrinks from the mental illness.

Then it's not really healing, it's just the grey matter dumping things and these people are now limited in other aspects of their life but they don't realize because they had been debilitated for so long that even a little wind seems like a major accomplishment yet compared to a normal baseline it's not.

We've already tried some of these specific things, and heavy metals are not an issue for the wife, we've done more blood tests than I can count for the homeopathic doctor and everything is normal and within perfect parameters.

It's not a magical diet thing that could cure her... I wish it was that easy.

What I think we really need. Is something that nobody on the planet can give. She needs a good mom. Honestly. But nobody random can just walk into our lives and be that. And Jesus ain't bringing the dead back to life yet.

But that is a far cry from saying all she needs is a demon exorcism and she'd be cured in a spiritual way, that's hokey, but a true mom, that would be the fuel her soul needs, and probably the best medicine, but it's also just as unobtainable as bringing my dead mom back to life.

2
glompywompy 2 points ago +2 / -0

No it does not. Wife has schizophrenia, has been given ivermectin, still has schizophrenia.

3
glompywompy 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wish I could find something on schizophrenia, but nothing so far. I think it's a real stretch to say everything.

-1
glompywompy -1 points ago +0 / -1

I wouldn't be here if not for Jones. I would still be a normies, vaxxed and all.

Jones woke me up.

If that is mossad, then they did a terrible job keeping people asleep.

I'll give Jones credit for preaching the awakening gospel in a way and format that could reach people.

The only thing is Jones going back on Sandy hook publicly, I don't believe him when he says it was real now.

I think Jones was jealous of how viral Q got, and so he tried to use his influence to shut Q down. Q struck back with a statement (probably disinformation because warfare) to shut Jones down.

3
glompywompy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Your reading comprehension is dense af bruh.

0
glompywompy 0 points ago +1 / -1

Why cant people in these situations giving warnings provide better proof? Indistinguishable from roleplay until it's too late, and only on the chan is not going to get that many people see the warning.

5
glompywompy 5 points ago +6 / -1

Need better reading compensation.

It mentioned the vaccines in winter 2020 which is correct.

There are metals in the vaccines, people attaching magnets on their injection sites too.

Deadly to babies, which it is, not kids.

You just suck at reading.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›