Hey, didn't it pertain to the original FISA that started the whole Trump / Russia hoax? He wound up being tried for changing the document that made it do a 180 degree turn regarding actual events. Of course, a DC jury let him off.

Does anybody have that info handy? Thanks.

I have so many things. I'll make a list and post them, but I'd love to hear about your favorites.

Over the years here I have read about and envied those of you who were able to wake someone up. I always wished I could accomplish the same. Well, I haven't quite done that, but I have found out that an acquaintance has been sort of red-pilled. Let's call it pink pilled. She is breaking out of the matrix, but I happen to know she is deeply embedded in and surrounded by 'tards. I know she is the type who can't handle too much too quickly. She is literally at the point where she is 'starting to wonder if some of our politicians don't have our best interests at heart.' Yes, you read that right. She's barely on the first step, so I don't want to overwhelm her with stuff that's too heavy. Baby steps for her. So what do you suggest as a short list of things I can begin to introduce her to? Nothing big like pizzagate or even Q. Not yet, anyway. I've got to make sure she has a firm foundation before I start erecting the skyscraper.

So where would you (or have you) started with someone who is just like a baby kitten opening their eyes for the first time?

So today I ran into a former work colleague. She was one of the first on the Trump Train back in 2015. 100% Maga, bled red white and blue. I haven't seen her for a few years but saw on FB that she voted for Potus in 24. Ran into her shopping and she was so black pilled, I didn't recognize her. He promised no new wars, he promised the Epstein files, he promised lower prices and everything is going up due to this cursed war. This, that and the other. It's like she expected the man to do miracles.

I was actually so surprised by her attitude, I could scarcely think. To me, he's done an amazing job. I keep hearing the left saying that there are 'a lot of people' who voted for Trump and regret it. I didn't believe it because I never met one, until today. I never could have believed she would turn on him. I was about to point out the good things he has done when her husband came over and pulled her away.

It got me to thinking, I want to make a list and keep it with me at all times in case something like this happens again. I don't want to be so flummoxed I can't think straight. What would you have said to her? Please list some of the great things you believe Trump has done. And if you know of anybody keeping track on line, please let me know. (Like Magapill back in the day, only current.) Thanks, frens.

Frens, I am seeing more posts here with 'old' information that has been labeled as new, astonishing or breaking. A lot is coming from X.com and clearly the posters on x aren't fact checking. Here is an example. Not picking on any dear frens, but wanted to make all aware to question everything. We are supposed to be an elite group of autists, after all. Cheers.

https://greatawakening.win/p/1ASFcpFZf0/cia-director-john-ratcliffe-conf/c/

It was during the whole Israel / Gaza peace deal when Trump was in Israel. It might have been the president of Egypt, or maybe someone else. He was speaking and Trump was on stage with him. He was shortish compared to Trump and bald. Anybody know who I mean or have that clip? Thanks.

Another post prompted me to make this one. It was about the Republicans introducing a "Transparency" bill about government spending.

But that requirement is already called for in the US Constitution. Which is the SUPREME law of the land. Specifically, it is one of the provisions covered in Article 1, Section 9 of said document. Did you know that? If not, WHY not? Few things will affect our lives as much as the protections guaranteed (not granted) by the Constitution. We should all know as much about it as possible and I propose a Constitution class be conducted right here at gaw.

Here is the pertinent section: Article 1 Section 9 (in part) "No money shall be drawn from the Treasury but in consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public money shall be published from time to time."

Who makes the laws? Congress is the sole body charged with that duty. Also covered in the Constituion, (Article 1 Section 1.) That's how important those who wrote the document believed the creation of laws to be. First Article, First Section.

And did you know that originally, the founders intended for US Senators to be elected by each state's legislature? That was later changed by I believe, the 27th amendment. So now the people vote for both the house of representatives and the senate. But WHY did the founders believe the states should elect the US Senators? And what would that mean to our country, today, if that had not changed? How often have the states had a republican majority in their state congresses? And wouldn't they be likely to 'hire' republicans for the US Senate positions? Think about that. TWO republican US Senators from a majority of states and we wouldn't have these close calls on votes.

Sorry for the rant. I do believe we would all benefit from studying the Constitution at least as much as we've studied the Q drops.

Here it is: https://constitutioncenter.org/the-constitution

Hi Frens, FractalizingIron's post about including sauce when posting reminded me of this. Please, please, PLEASE make your post titles searchable. There is a wealth of great information on this board, and it's possible to find information posted even years ago - - if you can search with the correct terms.

A lot of people complain about the search feature here. (Apparently, it doesn't work for everyone.) And of course, it doesn't search the content of threads, just the titles. That's why it's so important to have good keywords in your titles - so that you and frens can find that info at a latter time.

For instance, post titles like,

"You're not going to believe this!"

"Here we go again."

"Must see!"

.... and others that don't contain keywords relevant to the post will likely fade away in a day or so and never be seen again EVEN IF THEY CONTAIN GOOD INFO. But post titles that use specific keywords relevant to the post can be searched and found years later. Here's an example. Say you're going to post that video of Gavin Newsome in a zoom call with Biden, complaining about misinformation regarding the fires in his state. You might consider using any of these examples,

Cali Democrat whines. Who's surprised?

Typical democrat ducking responsibility.

Can you believe the nerve of this guy?

And anybody trying to find that thread again won't be able to find it. Instead, using specific keywords would allow you or others to find the thread again. Something such as this:

Gavin Newsome decries Misinformation about California Fires.

With that title, a person could find that thread using any of these search terms,

Gavin Newsome

Misinformation

California Fires

I actually wrote about this post title issue a few years ago and the thread was even stickied. Clear post titles seem like such an obvious thing, and we're probably all guilty of being vague at times. But I think it bears repeating. Please, help your frens and yourself out by thinking of helpful and searchable key words when posting a new thread. Cheers, frens.

Hopefully this won't get taken down. The election is less than 7 months away. You will be voting for Trump. Tell me what you love about him and what he did during his first term that you liked a lot. List as many things as you want. I'd like to hear what you have to say.