The mandates are not laws.
I linked a site with tons. And you’re also on a site where plenty of evidence can be found. I don’t think you want to do the research as you’ve already made up your mind, or at least let the TV do that for you.
Makes it sound more threatening if you ask me. It gives me the mental image of a quick punch or stabbing. I’m not taking it regardless of what they call it.
Yeah, that struck me as odd, too. I thought people were calling it that to be disparaging, like it’s an attack against one’s body (which I believe it is).
Well, SCOTUS has ruled that statistical evidence is admissible. See the 1993 case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals.
I also linked a site detailing a lot more evidence, statistical or otherwise. You can choose to ignored all of this if you’d like, but again in doing so you have answered my original question, and the answer is “invincible ignorance fallacy”.
I was hoping for something that would give us all some more insight into the thought processes involved in taking up a position of election fraud denialism, but there we have it.
So now you admit it’s grounds to look deeper? You dismissed it before.
How do figure that? He spent most of it in his basement making gaffes on zoom calls, at one point even admitting they had put together “the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics”.
Yes, it is. See also what is currently going on in AZ. Also hereistheevidence.com. There is plenty of evidence, and the cases that were dismissed were not based on evidence or lack thereof.
So, I guess the answer to my original question regarding how you rationalize the election as legitimate seems to be through liberal (pun intended) application of the invincible ignorance fallacy.
Someone here went around putting small CCP flags in front of any Bidet campaign sign they found last fall.
Biden didn’t run a shitty campaign?
You either missed the point or selectively parsed what I wrote. Read the last paragraph again... Also, polls may have predicted a Clinton win, but Norpoth model correctly predicted that Trump would win in 2016, with 87% confidence.
I really would love the insight into the thinking of those who can rationalize all this as normal, and I mean that. I'm not holding my breath, though.
I never cared for him before, then I learned that he is based.
Symbolism will be their downfall.
Let's see...
From 1986-2016, 19 bellwether counties voted for the candidate that won the election every time, apart from this year when 18 of the 19 chose Trump.
Biden supposedly received the most votes of any candidate in history, yet also won the fewest counties in history.
Weakest house coattails since JFK 1960. A net 13 seats flipped red.
Vote tallies that violate Benford's law. Not evidence of fraud, but can be an indicator and has led to discovery of fraud in other nations. Trump tallies were far more in line with Benford.
Biden's margin of victory in 4 states is only supported by vote dumps that came between 1:34-6:31 AM.
In Georgia, Biden led Trump 50.05 to 49.95% in 53 consecutive batches of votes.
Norpoth model. Since 1916, 13 out of 13 candidates who won their party primary by a 60% margin or higher went on to win the election. Trump won the republican primary by 85.6%.
There are many more, those are just some that I remember off the top of my head. I have not taken a deep dive into it since last November/December. One or two anomalies might happen, randomness is clumpy. When more and more are found, one must really consider Occam's razor. What is a simpler answer? Biden won by miracle, defying basically every known historical trend, statistical model, etc. Or vote manipulation occurred?
As an engineer you must understand math. Do you understand statistics as well? If so, how do you rationalize the results of the 2020 presidential election as legitimate?
That was the civil side of me. From the other side: get wrecked, commie, you know where you can stick that olive branch!
You'd need to use an acid wash, I hear.
The whole platform is a flaming commie libtard platform. Sadly there’s not a great alternative now for apolitical content...
This is the way. My home state of ME is still cucked because of the blue coastal towns that “elected” our governor. Our neighbor NH has no more mandate. I’ve been bringing my business over the border, but only to the based businesses that don’t try to make me put a rag on my face.
We don’t deserve a full and transparent audit. It’s our right. You don’t deserve a right, it just is.
That reminds me of the guy who runs the “Technology Connections” youtube channel. He was really into the “people movers” and elevators and similar tech used by Disney for a while, and made several videos on the topic which you might enjoy. Now that I think of it, I definitely can’t fault you for nerding out on a topic like that, considering I watched all of those!
If you want to palm your face all the way into Flatland, go do an image search on “fauci ouchie shirt”. I am not responsible for vomit, brain explosion/implosion or other adverse reactions.
Thank you. I’ve been struggling to articulate what seems “off” about these people to me. This is it.
edit attempt #2: I never really believed in the soul before. Until recently, it was just a concept I had pondered when I was into psychedelics briefly in my early 20s. Now in my mid 40s, I get it. The past year+ has been a huge spiritual red pill.
I already refer to these people as “election fraud deniers”. Triggers them every time.