6
hitchhiker 6 points ago +6 / -0

Triple. He's a citizen of USA, South Africa and Canada.

4
hitchhiker 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jamel_aka_jamal did Rich Men North of Richmond recently, and has been waking up in general lately. Very nice to see.

1
hitchhiker 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're not even bothering to pad their fake statistics this time. I guess they trust that nobody will even bother to research and will just blindly accept it.

If you take their data at face value, daily case rates are as low as they've been since the start of this BS, and were over 100x higher last winter.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/#graph-cases-daily

3
hitchhiker 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're not even bothering to pad their fake statistics this time. I guess they trust that nobody will even bother to research and will just blindly accept it.

If you take their data at face value, daily case rates are as low as they've been since the start of this BS, and were over 100x higher last winter.

https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/#graph-cases-daily

21
hitchhiker 21 points ago +22 / -1

Let's not cherry-pick the point we want to hear. Full context:

• The National Intelligence Council and four other IC agencies assess that the initial human infection with SARS-CoV-2 most likely was caused by natural exposure to an infected animal that carried SARS-CoV-2 or a close progenitor, a virus that probably would be more than 99 percent similar to SARSCoV-2.

• The Department of Energy and the Federal Bureau of Investigation assess that a laboratory-associated incident was the most likely cause of the first human infection with SARS-CoV-2, although for different reasons.

• The Central Intelligence Agency and another agency remain unable to determine the precise origin of the COVID-19 pandemic, as both hypotheses rely on significant assumptions or face challenges with conflicting reporting.

• Almost all IC agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not genetically engineered. Most agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not laboratory-adapted; some are unable to make a determination. All IC agencies assess that SARS-CoV-2 was not developed as a biological weapon.

33
hitchhiker 33 points ago +33 / -0

Currently at 28.6% regret taking it, 64.2% glad they did not.

2
hitchhiker 2 points ago +2 / -0

That doesn’t make sense. Instead of Trump’s arraignment he is supporting DeSantis? Do you mean “in light of”?

5
hitchhiker 5 points ago +5 / -0

An impeachment conviction requires a 2/3rd majority vote in the senate. I believe the only way succession would pass to the speaker is if both the president and vice president were impeached simultaneously, or at least the vice (now president) was convicted before a new vice president could be nominated and confirmed.

A narrow majority is not going to lead to an impeachment conviction, though.

3
hitchhiker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pence wasn’t supposed to send the decision back to the states on 1/6. All according to plan. He knew he was doing the “wrong” thing but did it anyway. Trump told us. “It takes more courage to do nothing.”

2
hitchhiker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump did say the 25th would come back to haunt Biden.

3
hitchhiker 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder if Elon had some protection against bots/click farms put in place before posting this poll.

9
hitchhiker 9 points ago +9 / -0

Grade A hopium there, fren.

1
hitchhiker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Aren't phospholipids an anticoagulant, though? I have antiphospholipid syndrome, which is an autoimmune condition in which the immune system attacks the antiphospholipids naturally in the blood stream. As a result, this makes me prone to clotting. We know these things are killing people, but is this the mechanism?

4
hitchhiker 4 points ago +4 / -0

That would only get her closer to the presidency if she was nominated and confirmed as new VP. Which could happen, but she doesn't automatically become VP if Brandon is ousted.

1
hitchhiker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Huma Abedin. I've always thought that name just sounds evil.

2
hitchhiker 2 points ago +2 / -0

You think seeing that would work? Muh Russian Pootinz disinformayshun!@!

2
hitchhiker 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's still available on Chewy, in fact they have a buy 2 get 1 free deal. I'm not in a financial position where I'd need to do that, but I may donate some to my town's pet food pantry.

4
hitchhiker 4 points ago +4 / -0

I doubled up on my Chewy subscription order a couple years ago when the first pet food shortages hit, and forgot to set it back to normal til a couple months ago. I have enough food to last myself 6-9 months. I have at least 3x that for my cats.

view more: Next ›