5
jEs2We9Qbw 5 points ago +5 / -0

When is enough enough?

Watched the whole video of her mom. The whole thing was absolutely brutal,

I don’t under how anyone can support this murder and yet, they do. Tooth and nail CNN’s home page it fighting for this guy like he’s a saint.

I’m dumbfounded that this can go on. Is there no law that can stop this? I get free speech but can the mom sue for defamation or something? Or FCC violation of some sort?

1
jEs2We9Qbw 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. How many people will go to prison? It seems so entirely out of control.

2
jEs2We9Qbw 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed. Which is where I’m at. If it was something they brought up all the time and now it’s not, why not? Maybe it wasn’t real like you’re saying.

9
jEs2We9Qbw 9 points ago +9 / -0

Came here to say that.

Grab them by the pussy, haven’t heard reference to that one for a while. Kek.

2
jEs2We9Qbw 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, this is a good one too. Lost track. Maybe this is the biggie that they are saying DOGE found.

3
jEs2We9Qbw 3 points ago +6 / -3

Trump addressed the drones. It was “testing” from some agency.

1
jEs2We9Qbw 1 point ago +1 / -0

100%

I am actually shocked that Pelosi’s name is always used as an example of theft. Normally names are hidden until an arrest but she is a prime target for sure.

1
jEs2We9Qbw 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes but after the 90 says is up, you think there will be folks hiding still stealing? I’m guessing there has to be some.

4
jEs2We9Qbw 4 points ago +4 / -0

She-he is really trying to distance herself away from it. Like she’s on some marketing campaign.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
3
jEs2We9Qbw 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nasty. I don’t even want to consider what this sir-farts-a-lot smells like. Has to be a Chinese spy and pussy mix. Maybe burnt tuna?

4
jEs2We9Qbw 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://greatawakening.win/p/19AwobMJfP/dc-draino-is-certain-a-corrupt-s/c/

Well, I’m not alone.

I think where I’m coming from is, yes, in my mind, I’m a no-importance person, I make this mistake for sure; maybe twice in the last couple decades. But in a high level role after being briefed on national security, gaining secret clearance, and having a high level position, I wouldn’t be who I am today, I would have a different perspective on things related to secrets and security and this would be something that I would be vigilant in not doing. I think there would be a heightened responsibility that I can’t even imagine having. Worst thing people would learn about me in something like this would be a pizza order or something so unimportant. Kek. So, that’s why I think it was on purpose, you don’t get top security clearance and listen to the laws and consequences without being a little more careful at best. So it seems plausible, but really not completely easily done.

18
jEs2We9Qbw 18 points ago +18 / -0

I would say that when adding people to a conversation about serious stuff you would be more cautious about adding folks.

So I’d say it’s like 99.9999% chance it’s on purpose. These assholes are doing everything to stop Trump. All they are left with now are high school tactics, which is kind of funny.

1
jEs2We9Qbw 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed.

However, having Pam Anderson as your chick probably is a silver lining for him.

1
jEs2We9Qbw 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could be. Seems like JA has gone quiet and then out of no where something like that will be revealed.

view more: Next ›