You mean the top of the Greater Turtle's shell?

Infinite or finite void with planets and stars and galaxies in it but mostly empty space = impossible and blasphemy

Infinite Minecraft world with wildly differing explanations for how The Sun and The Moon and stars work = literally exactly what the Bible says because "firmament"

I know you didn't mention Apollo, artardicus. You said something stupid like "every picture of Earth is CGI" completely ignoring the film ones of the planet Earth that NASA took when NASA sent humans on NASA Apollo missions and NASA gave the pictures to the entire global public.

I know the argument too when I bring up the live satellite feeds of Earth that anyone with internet access can watch. I've seen them enough, "Digital images = images taken by a computer = computer generated image haha I can never be wrong" followed by "film photographs from space are all photoshopped because I said so hahaha I can never be wrong." That's literally the only direction you can go with unless you are gonna try to convince me that you actually didn't know that the Apollo missions took photographs of Earth.

I honestly expected him to just reply "Yes." but also expected an essay about "perspective"

You again overestimate how large The Moon appears on Earth and completely misunderstand how it should appear. The Earth is 4x larger but appears 13x larger from the surface of The Moon, and if they were "the same size" and The Moon looked that humongous standing on Earth I would be worried for sure.

The Moon only appears large while it is actually pea sized just like the Earth appears pea sized to you but is closer to a bocce ball (the large ones) in real life as well as in that picture you keep bringing up.

Again I know what you are talking about and again you misinterpret what was said.

If they lost the technology for the Saturn V then how come we still used it for years after the moon landings were completed? If they lost the technology for the Apollo CSM then again how come we used it for years afterwards?

I do remember a Q post from the south pole with one of the scientists holding up a WWG1WGA sign. Interesting.

I'm glad you typed all that out so I could ignore it and reply with this

But since you won't agree with them or watch their three hour webcam Ms paint video that incorrectly explains "perspective", you just aren't "critical thinking" enough. They don't even know what critical thinking is when it's literally in the name.

I don't think the Apollo missions used CGI on their film cameras. But let me guess, those are conveniently fake so you can never be wrong?

More likely huge caves underneath the Earth that feel like you are "on the other side of the Earth" or "in the center of the Earth" to whatever explorer discovered them.

Do you think God created the world in 1950? Why does NASA get credit for what the Greeks and the Church and the sailors already agreed on?

I can only try so much before I realize you have nothing. Have you ever tried thinking critically about flat earth? I've been more than critical of mainstream theory as well as flat earth.

Actual critical thinking (questioning your own beliefs, and not just the words that mean "I'm smart") says, what is more likely? That stars are insanely large balls of hot gases trillions of miles away and similar to our sun, or that they are divine energy beings and angels that every astronomer and telescope operator is lying about and you have to have a very specific model of Nikon webcam and zoom in on them, you can clearly see that they are balls of aether that look like standby led lights through watery eyes?

You see, when they launch a new series of moon missions, you have to come up with a new story than "NASA says they don't know how to get to the moon." And I know the video you are talking about too.

Do you have any other objects in the photo to demonstrate that the Earth is relatively smaller than it should be? It looks fucking huge in that photo. Did you know that the moon is only the size of a pea held at arm's length from our perspective? The Earth in that pic looks like a bowling ball.

Oh true, but both flat earthers I knew irl were also extremely pushy with Christianity stuff to the point of calling someone a blasphemer for not "saying a Bible verse that disproves flat earth theory" when they half assed their own Bible verses' connection to flat earth.

It's likely that they are genuine then too, given that's just how they actually think God wants them to spread his good word. But it's just as likely that it's shills trying to turn people away from Christianity by making it appear to be some group of accusatory judgemental flat earthers and not peaceloving forgivers.

And do you know why it's called the north star??

It looks pretty big from the moon, certainly bigger than the pea sized moon appears from Earth.

True, but we've seen what they can do when the whole world believes in God too. That's one of the reasons God gave us Jesus.

Most of them are newbies, from other conspiracy forums that go banned, who only read Q posts that seem interesting to them. Any inconvenient post is "disinfo is necessary".

I mean it is flatter than a pancake, but that is just some funny math gimmick in a vsauce video.

So you can see the same buildings while standing on the roof of your house that you would see on the edge of the horizon in an airplane at 30,000 ft?

As much as I can, how much critical thought have you given it? Do you even know what critical thinking is? I don't know what Ron means but I'll assume that it's some inside joke you assume everyone else gets just like you assume everyone will believe flat earth theory if they would just "critically think" and watch some blurry video of a Nikon camera "showing stars the way they really are"

The photo that the moon landing people pounced on because "oh they had to shut off the cabin lights to take this shot that proves they never even left Earth"? yeah that was taken in one shot with a film camera, idk what you are talking about but it sounds like "NASA doesn't even know how to get back to the moon" level of misunderstanding

My bad man, I was trying to rip on the flat earthers but I see there are so many here who are serious that it actually looked like I was one of them. But the flat earth rocket man was definitely real even though it was probably a grift to get them to fund his rocket.

fish eyed flat piece of plexiglass?