by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

“As mentioned as simple fact, the burning of carbonaceous materials (wood, etc.) results in temperatures higher than the melting point of steel (wood @ 3596 F, iron @ 2800 F). The collapse would compress the air in the floor spaces and eject any molten materials by aspiration.”

Prove your bullshit. This is not an optimized combustion chamber. This is an open fire with black smoke indicating poor efficiency at burning its combustible materials.

“ No squibs. Just the compression of air in the collapsing floors and its exhaust through perforations in the building walls. Blowing out dust and smoke. What else would you expect? You have to understand what is going on, in order to understand what you are seeing.”

Again more revisionist bullshit. Watch the videos listen to the explosions.

1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh people are popping up talking about carbonateous fires being kinda hot and causing wtc 7 to collapse. Carbonateous, meaning stuff that had carbon in it.

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you are honestly interested this is a site with factual information.

https://www.ae911truth.org/

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Molten steel as reported.

Does the magic of carbonaceous bullshit explain molten aka LIQUID steel? What about a pile that continued to burn for weeks following 911?

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because that explanation is total bullshit.

Thermal expansion is a concept that NIST came up with and was popularized in a popular mechanics article on the topic. Also total bullshit.

Review the facts;

  • no plane hit wtc 7.
  • no additional combustible material was supposed to be there (I.e. contents of an airplane’s gas tanks)
  • this means the only combustible material would be standard office tower contents. Review all prior office tower fires in history, is there a single one that collapsed into its own foot print? The answer is no.
  • in the dust of the wtc complex we find micro iron spheres. Operating theory is that they are produced when molten metal (not hear weakened, but steel in liquid state) is forcibley blown out into the atmosphere where is cools while on free fall.
  • in the dust of the wtc complex unexploded nano thermate is detected. (I forget many of the details, there is a difference between thermate and thermite; the nano bit comes in because commercial grade stuff is made of materials with x particle size; but this unexploded stuff that was found had component bits that were MUCH MUCH smaller. This means highly sophisticated manufacturing techniques and a thermate that is much more expensive than commercial grade stuff and a thermate that is not commercially available was in fact used.
  • then we get to the free fall speed. Proven using video and known measurements. Wtc 7 collapsed entirely within … 11 seconds? For 6 of those seconds it can be shown (and was demonstrated by analysis performed in university of Alaska) the roof line of wtc 7 falls at free fall speed. That means everything under the roof also was falling at the speed of gravity. No resistance whatsoever. Think of a tower of wood in your camp fire. It falls over. Ok. But it falls over and hits another piece of wood that changes trajectory of the fall or slows the fall to some degree. Now imagine what is required for a roof line to fall at free fall speed. Answer: everything supporting that roof line also collapsed at that same instant.
  • squibs. Aka lateral ejections of material from the building often seen in controlled demolitions. Squibs are clearly visible in all three buildings pre and during collapse.
by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

“ Carbonaceous fuels “ that’s a new one to add to the pile of revisionist bullshit.

You realize wtc 7 was not hit by a plane did not have hydrocarbons and the “office fires” were consuming standard office equipment (desks, chairs, carpets, paper, etc).

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

You don’t get collapse at free fall speeds with “weakened” steel.

You get that with a skilled demolition team setting up timed charges.

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

The thermal expansion theory put out by NIST is looney tunes as well. WTC 7 was taken out by preplanted explosives. (Thermate)

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Retarded revisionist bullshit.

There were planes.

Preplanted explosives including thermate brought the buildings down.

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

And particle sizes that were way smaller than normal enabling a more violent chemical reaction.

by JFQ17
0
krypt0 0 points ago +1 / -1

That’s because you are retarded and have not spoken to any eye witnesses.

by JFQ17
1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

It wasn’t nuclear. That’s bullshit.

We have documented evidence of thermite in the dust. Thermite will cause the intense heat that we observed.

Don’t fall for the bullshit and do read up on cass sustien’s cognitive infiltration.

4
krypt0 4 points ago +4 / -0

Any guesses what India did to upset the WEF's pretty boy? We all know Trudeau wouldn't take such a big step unless told to. We also know that nation states don't give a shit when a plebe is murdered by the powers that be. If anything they just play a game of tit for tat over these sorts of things, unless, unless there is a need for an open international dispute to be created and a pretext is needed.

2
krypt0 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want the tshirt!

1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Placed where? On the road? That’s silliness. That highway is very busy, that makes no sense.

I remember the pictures of the taxi that was hit by the utility pole.

0
krypt0 0 points ago +1 / -1

There is a circular blow out in the third ring that is about 8 to 10 feet in diameter.

There is also a single jet engine that was found.

There are photos showing some debris. Looks like aluminum sheet that’s crumpled.

There were impacts on approach to the pentagon. Couple of utility poles were knocked down.

As for the eye witnesses, I don’t any of them are educated enough to distinguish between a plane and a cruise missile.

1
krypt0 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now compare that lawn to ANY other plane crash site and not the incredible lack of debris.

4
krypt0 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol

Fast forward to 3:30 in the video.

Do you see any wing parts? Seats? Luggage? Landing gear? Tail section?

It’s the amazing penta lawn. It swallows planes whole without leaving a trace.

0
krypt0 0 points ago +1 / -1

No it’s longer than that. Emergency vehicles were not on scene that quickly. By the end of that video we are already seeing fire trucks with foam. That’s at least half an hour to an hour post impact.

2
krypt0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Each successive outrage awakens a new cohort.

Some people work up and saw the corruption with JFK. Ever since more and more people have awoke.

911 woke up a lot of people. It was 911 that really taught us that our government will do false flag terrorism. Yes there was the gulf of Tonkin prior to that, but no one believed that we would do such a thing.

Now with Covid, far more people are awake. And with the onset of Covid we finally have a missing piece. WHY!?!?

Why would an otherwise good person participate in such evil? And the answer is adrenochrome. Take a normal person that is ambitious, compromise them with child sex slaves that are murdered in front of them. Then get them addicted to adrenochrome and they will do whatever you ask.

So many people have woken up. It’s good, but as we saw with covid, there are still way too many people that are clueless.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›