45
23
31
32

Empathy is being able to understand other people’s feelings. That’s not what the supporters of the invasion are doing. For example, a woman from Christendom imagines that if she was from the third world that she would want to come to Christendom to work and live peacefully, to assimilate with the superior culture, and to learn from its orderly and innovative ways. So she projects her own feelings onto the invaders and figures that is what they’re feeling when they come to her country. But of course that’s not what the invaders are feeling and she’s clueless about it because she has projection and sympathy but not empathy. It’s the high-aptitude men from her culture who are able to understand more precisely what the invaders are feeling: aggression, lust, greed, sloth, envy, spite, libido dominandi, and maybe in some cases earnest religious fervor for their desert death cult.

The projection and sympathy are just from the more decent of the invasion supporters. The less decent may realize that the invaders have evil intentions, but those indecent supporters have ulterior motives such as vanity or selling out.

31
32
37

Joe Rogan has decent takes sometimes, but his recent warning about Jimmy Kimmel’s treatment was off-base. He warned that if Democrats regain control of the FCC that they’ll use the precedent of Kimmel’s suspension to censor MAGA. This is wrong for a couple reasons. First, the FCC didn’t suspend Kimmel- his own company did. So there is no precedent of FCC action. Second, there have always been officially recognized limits on free speech. Speech that is restricted includes conspiring to commit crime, threatening to commit crime, writing libel, and speaking slander. Kimmel calling the shooter MAGA was slander. That type of slander has always been unacceptable. There is no hate speech enforcement or chilling effect of new government restrictions involved in this case.

118

shooter is boomerlib. Kirk doesn’t look good

20

Fraud vitiates everything. The farce has gone on too long.

32
66
12

The series’ first season is about the fall 2021- spring 2022 football season, and the series’ second season is for the 2022- 2023 season. The c19 vaxx was rolled out in late 2020 and was taken widely in Wales and the rest of the UK in 2021. In the first season, Jordan Davies, a good young player who is a Wrexham local, reveals that his wife recently had a miscarriage. He doesn’t mention that she got vaxxed in early 2021, but statistically, she most likely did. Then in the second season Jordan is hit with another tragedy as his wife miscarries again. Still no mention of the vaxx.

Paul Mullin, a Liverpudlian who played in Cambridge in 2020- 2021, was signed by Wrexham in the 2021 preseason to be their star goal scorer. During the first season, Paul is shown in his backyard playing with his infant son, Alby, who seems like a bright, responsive, joyful kid. In the second season, Paul laments that right after Alby turned one, he “regressed” and no longer seemed like his normal self. Alby was then diagnosed with autism. This wouldn’t seem as suspicious if Paul himself hadn’t noticed a drastic change around the first birthday, which is one of the milestone ages on the childhood vaccination schedule. The series doesn’t mention if Alby received vaccination(s) around the time of that turnaround point or note a correlation.

I realize it’s not the series’ job to raise vaccine awareness, but for people who are otherwise civic-minded, it would be nice if they took a fair look into this tragedy that is befalling the Welsh and English people.

30
104
31
32

The movie opens with Tim’s coworker at the Department of Homeland Security complaining that even though he has helped bust some pedos, he hasn’t actually rescued any kids. Tim has to use his over-a-decade service record at DHS to pull strings with his boss to allow Tim to manipulate a jailed pedo into setting up an actual child trafficking scheme. Tim is allowed to go to the border to try to visually identify the boy in the pedo’s advertising photograph. Since the coyote doesn’t know that his pedo “customer” has been busted, the coyote seems confident that he’ll be able to child-traffic easily like usual, even with a somewhat unsuitable ID for the child. We get the feeling that border control would drop the ball if Tim isn’t there on special assignment.

After rescuing the boy, Tim learns of the boy’s sister who is still in bondage in Latin America. Since locations outside of the US Homeland are outside the purview of DHS, Tim’s boss doesn’t want to permit Tim to go look. Tim has to describe the personal damage and anguish that his career has caused him, while he has tears in his eyes, for his boss to relent and make a very special exception, but he only grants a short amount of time and a $10K expense account from a generic slush fund. Tim is determined to make the most of it.

In Cartagena, Colombia, Tim learns about the girl’s traffickers while making valuable contacts with a couple voluntary anti-traffickers and a Colombian government agent. As Tim moves to set up a meeting with the traffickers, he requests more resources from DHS in order to make his cover more plausible. He is denied and ordered to return home. He tells the bad news to one of his volunteer contacts, who laments about bureaucracies and advises that’s why he rescues kids on his own without involving government. Tim decides to resign from the DHS and continue his mission, with his wife’s blessing. The small band of anti-traffickers concoct a plan that relies on a heavy investment from the other volunteer, a wealthy businessman. Their sting operation results in the liberation of 53 children, which is 53 more kids than Tim’s partner in the beginning of the movie was able to rescue in his DHS career.

The movie suggests that private individuals on their own steam are able to help kids more than government bureaucracies such as DHS do.

66
13

I think rightists and normies who wanted to get in these fields mostly just wanted to do good work for its own sake, without a political ax to grind. Playing it straight in these roles might seem boring or ineffectual, so rightists often instead choose STEM, business, the trades, etc. Perhaps one reason is that rightists have underestimated the effectiveness of playing the roles the crooked way..

I can remember when I was in school and I would roll my eyes in disagreement with some statement from a leftie teacher and think to myself “this crap is really unconvincing”. I projected my skepticism onto others, and figured the other kids were just pretending to go along with the leftism to get good grades. I thought of the teacher as being a sell out, handpicked by the Board of Ed for his willingness to propagandize kids. I thought the teacher was a loser for spouting unconvincing crap, so I didn’t want to become a teacher myself. I extended that line of thinking to almost all of those left-dominated career possibilities; that they are undesirable because they are ineffective at convincing people.

It wasn’t until after we graduated from different colleges that I realized that some of my old public school classmates weren’t snapping out of the leftism. Turns out that back then they weren’t just pretending in order to get grades. They really were convinced by the leftist crap. They chose some of the fields in this post title because they weren’t as skeptical as I was about how persuasive those fields could be, because they were persuaded themselves.

The crooked institutions didn’t influence the people who are naturally critical thinkers, so those people didn’t bother to infiltrate the crooked institutions. We just figured if they’re not defundable, they’re ignorable. That was a mistake. We should’ve recognized the danger to other people instead of projecting ourselves:

22
26
16
15
15

If women feel the call of motherhood, they should marry young to men who have already calculated the equation and have resources to weather a storm. Men have more to ponder because their fertile age is longer and they have duties to resist satanism peacefully when possible but also to be combat-ready.

The government aborts babies, trans-mutilates children, kills people in other countries, maintains political corruption scams, turns financial service sectors into cronyist monopolistic ponzi schemes, subsidizes dysgenics and low iq fornication, mandates poison, forces children into indoctrination, and attacks Christianity. Most taxpayer money funds evil, so acquiescing to income tax is supporting satanism. The alternative is counter economics, which can be too risky for supporting a family.

A man must calculate if having a mainstream taxable job is worth tithing a third to satan. To make it worth it, he must invest his remaining income into Godliness in general and specifically into reproducing freedom fighters. I figure the break-even point is having three kids who grow up to be good soldiers of God. This is harder than just having three kids, because they must be raised with the Gospel, with a good example of a father, without excessive worldliness, and with enough honor and integrity to resist the temptation to strive for social status by selling out. It’s a tall order, and some men can’t hack it, so they’d be better off staying single, living on a black market that doesn’t directly fund evil, and praying, reading, lifting, running, and shooting so they can be part of a show of force against satanic communism. If a man pays income tax, lets his kids get vaxxed, sends them to government schools without spiritual protection and preparation, doesn’t speak out against political corruption, and doesn’t prepare to fight, then he is a net failure who has made things worse for the good people.

11
view more: Next ›