be careful who you follow

imagine being american, reading those bullet point objectives, and opposing it solely because of trump.

this entire interaction reminds me of many many years ago when a child told their parents they saw santa claus and they were all "oh yeah? prove it" at which the child turned into a petulant child, throwing a fit, crying for their parents to believe them, but had no way of proving it so they just cried harder and harder. anyway 34 days or 34 years the truth shines through the darkness and you went from "i have to make a new post" to "i cant post that here" to saying you blocked me to repeatedly disrespecting me after unblocking me but saying the blocking system didnt work.

the truth is, you would rather die on your hill of deception rather than take 4 seconds and show the post/reply you reported and your dozen or so replies to me reflect that. you've gone well out of your way to avoid doing so and got really really angry that i even questioned you to do so. i dont know or care about anyone else's perception of you but as far as i go, you have lost any and all credibility now and forever based on how you conducted yourself here. and all you had to do was easily backup your claim with a quick upload.

i still reject your narrative because now to me, it glows. they want us divided.

it is time for me to see if the blocking system turns itself on and off selectively the way you tried to convince me. seek Jesus Christ. you clearly do not have the Holy Spirit’s presence inside you. prayers up for your lost soul. you are now blocked. :)

okay purkiss do you care about the rules on greatawakening.win because based on your constant disrespectful behavior, i do not have reason to believe you do.

i will also ask this: do you think you are above the rules here because your repetitive disrespectful behavior made me believe you do not and thrive on rules for thee, not for me. i can only base my opinions on experience though.

am i still blocked?

odd i tried sending you a dm privately before and it said i was blocked by you but my second dm after you started replying to me again when you had already said you blocked me went through. either the blocking system is picking and choosing specifically with us or, occam's razor. :)

i'm praying for you purkiss you need prayers desperately :)

have a great day. :)

that wasn't for you that was for everyone else. didn't you block me for your health?

i reported this comment along with a couple other disrespectful comments in a thread about rule enforcement off-site, so i look forward to seeing how, or if, the rules will be enforced here. does irony await? tune in next time.

nobody will see this but you.

sung in the tune of toto - africa

verse

🎵🎶the rumors travel fast across the nation’s open plains,

They say barrack obama slipped off the grid again.

He signed the laws then broke the ones he used to preach,

Now he’s hiding out with Big Mike far beyond the law’s reach.

Prosecutors trace the trail he left behind,

Every crooked deal, every secret he designed.🎵🎶

chorus

🎵🎶They’re gonna send a team to bring him back from Kenya,

Dragged from the shadows where he thought he’d never be found.

He tried to dodge the truth but justice still remembers

There’s no escaping when the reckoning comes around.🎵🎶

last time indeed lol

i have a compulsive liar in my family. they never prove themselves when confronted. they just assure us they have nothing to lie about and act out when pressed further. they never have supporting evidence, only their word and aggression towards those that don't blindly accept it. i pray for them often.

this is my last comment on your post. i hope you find peace purkiss. i really do. i will pray for you too. :)

nothing is condescending.

i have no reason to believe what you claim without supporting evidence. you provided the evidence of your ban and based on the rules and the language you chose to use violated those rules.

are we elite researchers here or are we supposed to make exceptions and just go with frens' "source trust me, bro"s? because they're frens? my conclusions are based on evidence, not feelings. i am sorry if my method and request for evidence you claim exists but cannot share offends you. like i said, i hope your day gets better. :)

i need to see the post you reported because that is what you shared here with your post is a screencap of the result of something you reported yet you refuse to share that and are trying to divert away with commentary so i am just going to accept you refuse to show what was actually reported and thus i reject your narrative until given reason not to which is the actual post or comment your reported to use as a basis for your post claiming a double standard. anyway have a great day purkiss i hope it gets better for you. :)

i am not missing any point in fact since you wont post anything to corroborate the other side being equally bad with actual screenshots, i begin to doubt the reality of the matter each comment you leave without showing it so i hope you can understand that from an outside point of view that has no problem remaining neutral while waiting on all the facts and based on what evidence you provided all i can confidently say is you used speech that violated the rules and i cannot speak on the other side without anything but your word. i hope you understand that.

share the screenshot you have thanks

right and it isnt a double standard unless their language is similar which is why it is necessary to see to find out if we can come to that conclusion on our own so i hope you share it soon. anything else really is for a lack of better word noise. just post the screenshots like you did here. can you not do that right now for some reason? i am curious what they said that did not get removed. show us the post or reply that says "white kids should be burnt and then used as fertilizer" thanks

it didnt i remove default votes on all comments i leave

this is great from a 3rd party point of view though if i have learned anything about calling people out it is they are usually soft and hate the truth and because of this they act out even though the truth is still the truth whether or not they can handle it but in fairness this behavior usually occurs online because for some reason it never happens to my face. weird :)

there is a reason subversion is used multiple times in Q drops https://qalerts.app/?q=subversion

based on the language you used and the rules you agree to follow using X, your statement does in fact seem to violate the terms to which you agreed for using the platform.

i cannot blindly ignore what the rules say just because you are a well known and liked user here sorry purkiss but in your case, the language you chose to use is in clear violation of the rules, regardless of if you feel the balance of enforcement is unfair. capital punishment, though a form of justice, is still violent and your comment seems (to me) to fall under at least one, and up to three, of the bulletpoints listed in the second image.

people get banned from gaw all the time based on how the mods feel about and interpret the rules. some get heavily enforced while others do not. you and i should expect no different treatment elsewhere as rules are established to be followed.

i would have to see the language used by 'mjfree' to come to an honest and reasonable conclusion on whether or not i believe the language they used is as egregious. can you please add a link to or a screenshot of the post you reported to compare language? thank you. :)

edit - i went to nitter.net/mjfree/ and scrolled through a large amount of posts and reposts. i did not look at comments or replies and though i only got through the last 18 hours worth of their posts and reposts, i did not find anything that looks like anything calling for the killing of whites but instead just a bunch of trump hate. i do hope you will provide the post or reply in question that is calling for the killing of whites in SA as you put it.