I just wanted to let you pedes know that I have indeed received my ivermectin from these guys. Just as BasedCitizen says, I got them in unopened blister packs in a bagie.
Thank you for the info, fren! Out of curiosity, did you create an account before ordering? I simply ordered without an account, I'm trying to figure out why they didn't offer me a direct credit card payment.
Your horse must be so happy, fren. Thank you for the confirmation!
Thank you! I feel more at ease now, hopefully it goes through for me as well.
I'm in Romania, I'm currently banking on the incompetence/ignorance of our customs authorities to simply get this order through. Hopefully I won't have any issue, but it might just come down to the way they package their product.
Why can't I save these gifs T_T
Ban this guy for asking to be made a mod and then ban me for telling you what to do before you ban yourself.
Where are people getting the march/end of march idea from? If Flynn asked for 30 days at the end of December, shoudn't those 30 days be up at the end of January? If we're going back to 4th of March presidential inauguration and 1776 Constitution, everything needs to happen in February, starting tomorrow.
And Romania!
The problem arises that you are making the argument for agnosticism, and not for God's existence.
Just as in a court of law, the burden of proof lies on the accuser and not on the defendant. The accuser makes the allegations and must sustain them with evidence.
It is humanity's experience that God does not exist, regardless of the amount of belief we apply, because belief is outside the methods we use to understand the universe and its mechanics, and none of those methods can even formulate a basic assumption for the existence of God.
In fact, the more we refine those methods, the more they do not require and exclude God. If you are to observe the progression of science you will see that early scientists' universal models did include God, to explain those things not covered by their models, but as science progressed, those models become more complex and expansive and God was gradually and finally completely excluded.
As such, for you to provide evidence of God, you are required to provide the models and methods by which you have concluded God's existence, and thus far, all that has truly been provided is belief, which is quite possibly the least convincing thing there is, as anything can be believed by its mere statement, without any sort of evidence.
For instance, I believe there is a race of purple spidermonkeys on some planet in the galaxy next door, I can't prove it, but I believe it to be so, and now I come to you and ask you to prove it's not so. Does that sound fair?
For me the "way the universe is connected and functions on all levels" is simply not enough. It may even be a valid observation, but it does not follow that it is necessarily attributed to God's work or proves its existence. In fact, none of our current models of universal mechanics require, assume or prove God in any way.
So first thing, atheism is the lack of belief, not the belief in non-belief. I cannot profess to you my belief in nothing, as I do not profess belief to begin with.
Secondly and unfortunately this argument can be turned against you quite easily I'm afraid.
The burden of proof ultimately rests on those making the claim for God's existence, as they are making the claim against what is observable or quantifiable by human means. It is not incumbent on me to prove that God does not exist, but on the believer to prove he does.
How can you claim to know God exists if he is outside the known? By virtue of it being outside the known, it can never truly be known, and is impossible to sustain otherwise as it would need to become known, nullifying God's position as being outside the known.
At this point you only have two options, which is the God of the Gaps argument, which is to say we relegate God to what we do not know, and God is ever-shrinking the more we end up knowing about the universe.
Or option 2, much more likely, that ultimately leads to agnosticism as neither side can ever TRULY know for sure that God exists. Ultimately this is really the most sensible position to take, as agnostics simply admit that since there is no proof one way or another for divinity, they will never truly know unless divinity manifests itself to them. Arguably we should all be agnostics as a matter of principle and consistency with our way of analysis and fact gathering as a species.
The fact is belief in God's existence is currently only achieved through belief, and not evidence.
Ultimately it doesn't truly matter, since it is true that humans benefit from belief in God, regardless of God's existence, so I subscribe to Jordan Peterson's stance whereby he says that he acts as if God exists, which does not require the existence of God, but the acknowledgement that God is the ultimately example of what humans should strive to emulate in their behavior in life. (barring some of the more nasty stuff in the Old Testament hehe).
I was born in an overwhelmingly majority orthodox christian society, and my nation's language is filled with expressions that contain God. God's work being one of them. It was unavoidable that these expressions found their way into my vocabulary, and I don't feel that purging them from usage is appropriate, they still contain meaning as they draw it from the concept of God and do not rely on the existence of God.
I also did not use the expression in a disrespectful manner, as I really believe our mods require our support and approval, not because I enjoy banning opposing viewpoints, but because shills don't really come here to have well-reasoned arguments, which is why I think it's important that we keep focused on the task at hand, and not be distracted by petty people.
Neither do I foresee my country becoming majority atheist any time soon, nor do I think that is necessarily desirable, certainly not at the hand of the majority of atheism's current professors, that is to say leftists puppeteered by cabal elites.
I think it's a valuable discussion that we should continue to have well into our species' future, after we get rid of these bad actors, and I think you will find people on both sides of the argument now and forever, but I don't think it's healthy to consider atheists as deluded in their lack of belief.
Your argument unfortunately only works if you conflate the concept of God with the existence of God. The concept of God is undeniable, just as the concept of flat earth is. It is the existence that is in question, and upon which you can profess belief or non-belief. The concept of God does not prove its existence, just as the concept of flat earth does not prove its existence.
Wouldn't that be the case for everyone then? No worship figure, no worshipers, makes sense, right?
Maxine Waters has never said anything even remotely well-meaning ever since I started paying attention to American politics. I know it's tempting to give people the benefit of the doubt but this is just too weak to go on and the evidence to the contrary is overwhelming. Even if she does end up being a white hat, she has no place in the coming political landscape where truth will be more valued.
Also keep in mind that many of these corrupticians can smell which way the wind is blowing and as Q has said, they've been coaxed into changing allegiances over time, but just because they're batting for the home team now (on pain of execution probably) doesn't make them good people.
I started spending a lot of time here since I got fired right around election time and I sometimes wish I could banhammer some shills too, the problem is there's been so few of them recently thanks to mods like Evspra who do God's work! (even an atheist such as I can see that it is God's work :D)
Keep it up! We've still got a some time to go before they're all forcibly redpilled, their denial screams drown out the world as they get a detox purge course for their brainwashing and we have to start guiding them, until then, no reason to have them around haha!
Honestly, I think they've done enough damage. Let's hope they stop long enough to get arrested so further damage can be prevented.
Thank you for your hard work!
To avoid giving youtube age information or views, please find links on other platforms first, such as bitchute, rumble, lbry etc.
OP's clip on bitchute
Care to explain?
I want this to be true but this website just looks like somebody's wishlist blog to be frank.
That's assuming they did, and Trump ddin't just let them do it to cage them. I admit I doomed a bit but now I'm back on the pain train again, at least until the 30th of January. So my money is still on Trump dropping the hammer between now and then. There's too much out there that proves the fraud, beside all the other crap, no way the hammer of justice isn't dropping on pedotus and his demonrats soon.
Yeah, most will never wake up no matter how hard we try.
I just wish these articles would actually post the relevant parts of the bill and a link to it, it's impossible to share them with NPCs otherwise, as they will never believe it. Why is it so hard?