1
slippypede 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't get this line of thinking. You say you have your eyes set on Justice and Freedom, but some of the accusations brought up, if true, have been direct obstacles to obtaining that.

1
slippypede 1 point ago +1 / -0

But the ones stirring up trouble are the people involved and some of the accusations are treasonous.

1
slippypede 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's fair. However, there was another phone call between Patrick Byrne and Lin Wood where Byrne brought some serious accusations against Sidney Powell. One of the things he mentioned was that Sidney Powell is working with Hillary Clinton's former lawyer, also implying that he was the one sabotaging all the election cases and the cause of the bad press. He also mentioned that the Arizona audit and the head of the Cyber Ninjas was not up to task, and that there's been a lot of moves to basically just keep us pacified. I'd like to know if this is true. I get that perhaps Patrick Byrne is playing a role and stirring up shit to manufacture conflict, but like I said, there are things in there that we can take a look at to see if it's something worth pursuing, or maybe just reserving judgment until it plays out. But every comment is quick to stifle any questioning of people's chosen heroes. At the end of it, I'll probably look like the fool that fell for the ploy, but this is just my take.

1
slippypede 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is true, but what if you're wrong. Some of the accusations brought up are serious. There's a few things we can check on to verify if we are moving in the right direction, but everyone has their mind made up already that this is theater based on their own hunch.

2
slippypede 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well that's the point... Can we trust Patrick Byrne? If what he says is true we have a problem. If what he says is a lie we have a problem. Either way we have snakes to root out. But we can't talk about it because "rah rah NCSWIC, sun tzu, noise/signal, doomers."

5
slippypede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Patrick Byrne claims Hillary Clinton's former lawyer is working with Sidney Powell and Byrne implies that he may have sabotaged many of the court cases. That's just noise?

2
slippypede 2 points ago +3 / -1

I don't think it's simple bickering. Patrick Byrne says Sidney Powell is working with Hillary Clinton's former attorney, whom he claims worked with Hillary right up until the election. What do you think about that? Shouldn't we investigate?

3
slippypede 3 points ago +4 / -1

So, here you had an opportunity to do some research and spread truth, but after 5 minutes, decided it was better to come on here and *talk *about doing some research and spreading truth.

1
slippypede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not sure if you are still looking for legal advice. Found you from your other post, thanks for the quick laugh. Anyway, I hear Liberty Counsel at https://lc.org is top notch. This was recommended by Dr. Peter McCullough on a couple of his podcast episodes. I told my neighbor about it, and he was able to get an exemption. Not sure if it was directly tied to the information on the website, but he did thank me saying that it was a great resource. Good luck.

9
slippypede 9 points ago +13 / -4

This wasn't an attack from some outside force like the MSM. These were questions raised by Lin Wood claiming that attacks are coming at him from all sides, including members of the patriot community. Is that not enough to look into it? If he's right, then we have a big problem on our hands. If he's wrong, then Lin is the problem. So far, he's just asking us to look into it ourselves and draw our own conclusions. He's the only one coming out forthright, whereas the others are ignoring or deflecting all together. Even if you think this is part of some grand plan/art-of-war play, well then why are the players involved causing the so-called distraction?

3
slippypede 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm no expert, but if I recall correctly, the mechanism in which they work is quite different. The monoclonal antibodies work outside the cell, whereas the jab instructs your cells to manufacture the spike proteins. This is uncontrolled. He's made it this far holding out, don't break now.

0
slippypede 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sorry, I didn't answer your question completely. Lin Wood never said Soros and General Michal T. Flynn are connected. There is no connection between General Flynn and Soros. Lin Wood is saying the Deep State wants you to think that is what Lin Wood is saying, because then it can be proven completely false and then people will forget about the phone calls and texts between Lin Wood and General Flynn.

5
slippypede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ivermectin does a lot for covid. It should be the first line treatment and used early, as soon as you get any symptoms. You can also take it prophylactically. Joe Rogan's talk about monoclonal antibodies might be true because of his age, or it could be something that he sensed made him better (i.e. gave him a slight energetic boost, but not necessarily the cure), or maybe because he's just getting too much heat talking about ivermectin.

3
slippypede 3 points ago +3 / -0

If your family doctor is pro vax, he might not recommend the antibodies. You would have to go and find either your local emergency center or urgent care clinic that provides these services. Get it when you feel a slight fever coming on, not when you can no longer breathe. You have to get it as soon as you feel something coming on like how Joe Rogan did.

Regarding your 2nd question, I'm not a doctor or scientist so I couldn't tell you for sure. However, this isn't a prophylactic therapy. Dr. Peter McCullough recommends the monoclonal antibodies for people 50 or older and/or if you have comorbidities. If you are relatively young and healthy, sticking to standard vitamin regimen recommended by Dr. Zelenko and others, and taking HCQ/Ivermectin might be enough, and McCullough says so as well. If you are looking for a good prophylactic, go buy yourself some povidone-iodine. It's brand name is called "Betadine." This is a very strong concentration so you need to dilute it with Distilled water. Do 19 parts distilled water to 1 part Betadine as a 0.5% mixture and use this as a mouth wash/gargle and nasal swab on a q-tip twice a day, and up to 4 times a day if you are sick - DO NOT Ingest. If you have thyroid problems or otherwise allergic to iodine, let me know and I can point you to other solutions.

If you want sources, let me know as well.

1
slippypede 1 point ago +2 / -1

Well, the posts with the Soros files are forwarded private messages from Stew Peters and Jarrin Jackson asking Lin Wood about the meaning of them. Lin Wood posts these private messages to the public to show how the Deep State is operating. He then starts to ask some rhetorical questions:

"Can it be true that Michael Flynn is on a power of attorney with George Soros???

Or is this a CIA/Deep State escape trick to discredit Patriot leaders who are seeking TRUTH?

This power of attorney was sent to Jarrin Jackson and me on our reply channels tonight. There are no coincidences."

Lin then posts a photo of "Michael **J. **Flynn" the actual Soros guy, and points out that this particular photo started circulating right around the same time as the Soros power of attorney document, stating that:

"In real time, I posted the power of attorney and the photos of Michael J. Flynn.

This was a coordinated effort to discredit me and others AND distract from the texts and phone calls which revealed the TRUTH about Michael Flynn.

The games the Deep State plays."

So the Soros document started popping up out of nowhere and it reached the private mailbox of Stew Peters, Jarrin Jackson, and Lin Wood. At the same time, there was the photo of Soros' Michael Flynn photo going around the internet. Lin believes this was a Deep State trap to get him to make a foolish mistake which would discredit him and get people to discount the earlier recorded conversations and texts involving General Flynn. Even though Lin Wood didn't fall for the trap, seems like the public has, since it's running with this "Lin Wood didn't do his research, can we still trust him" narrative, which may have been the intention in the first place.

4
slippypede 4 points ago +4 / -0

The government pre-purchased 500 million doses under Trump. Any talk about shortage is fabricated or purposely mismanaged to further the agenda. According to Dr. Peter McCullough, you need to get the monoclonal antibodies within the first few days for it to be effective; the sooner, the better. The thing about it is, make sure you are NOT admitted to the hospital as an inpatient, because they cannot administer it once you are into the system. Apparently, you go and they put you in a room for about an hour while they give you the injection. It is easier to get in some areas. Heard some stories that they are "prioritizing" certain racial and age groups.

0
slippypede 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm reading his telegram through the preview, so just scroll up from the bottom until you reach the post that states:

Michael Flynn George Soros

Michael Flynn George Soros

Michael Flynn George Soros

Pray for Michael Flynn.

If you start reading down from there, you'll see his posts/links as well as the dialogue he is having with himself about seeing through the Deep State lies.

2
slippypede 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd like to point out that Lin Wood did not release the George Soros "power of attorney" thing carelessly. He posted the papers along with a photo of Michael J. Flynn at the same time, acknowledging the different Michael Flynns. If you read through Lin's subsequent posts, what he was trying to convey was that this was a Deep State bait laid out to entrap him and make him look stupid and detract from his original statements about General Flynn.

2
slippypede 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ok, I get it. You don't like Lin Wood. But my comment has nothing to do with whether you agree with him or not. The previous commenter stated that Lin was quick to put out false statements, but it was he who put out a false statement against Lin, since he did not read through the entire thread. So you are not interested in the truth of the matter because you don't like him? Good to know.

3
slippypede 3 points ago +4 / -1

In this case, you are the one quick to put out false research without verifying it. Go take a look at Lin's telegram again. He posted both the "power of attorney" and Michael J. flynn photo at the same time to make the point that the Deep State was hoping he would make the mistake you are saying he is making. Maybe you should question your friend at We the Media.

Lin Wood: "In real time, I posted the power of attorney and the photos of Michael J. Flynn.

This was a coordinated effort to discredit me and others AND distract from the texts and phone calls which revealed the TRUTH about Michael Flynn.

The games the Deep State plays."

6
slippypede 6 points ago +8 / -2

Ezra Cohen fully backs Lin: "Dan Crenshaw is attacking Lin Wood. That is all you need to know." https://t.me/s/EzraACohen

In one of his last posts he also says "Pegasus - Israel Epstein - Israel Israel will be last." Well, Lin raised some issue about Flynn's connection to Pegasus. Sounds big if true, ignore?

1
slippypede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why are you equating Q with Jesus' coming?

1
slippypede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ray Croc left them 1.5 billion dollars. They don't give a shit.

9
slippypede 9 points ago +9 / -0

Hey brother, thanks for saying this: "If this is a TRUTH movement, and not cult of personality movement, then we must be willing to look at multiple sides of any issue, and THEN arrive at conclusions."

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›