That’s the point, fren. He’s subtly supported and provided nods toward the movement, but when cornered he has always denied and deflected. This is no different.
Fair point, but if Flynn is not involved with Q himself, it'd be hard for him to deny the legitimacy of the only source in the world who accurately predicted judge Emmet Sullivan's resignation.
Not about profit. Could just be about getting MSM to talk about them even in a negative way. Some people have never heard of Flynn or Wood. MSM might open some eyes without indenting to.
Patrick Byrne claims Hillary Clinton's former lawyer is working with Sidney Powell and Byrne implies that he may have sabotaged many of the court cases. That's just noise?
Well that's the point... Can we trust Patrick Byrne? If what he says is true we have a problem. If what he says is a lie we have a problem. Either way we have snakes to root out. But we can't talk about it because "rah rah NCSWIC, sun tzu, noise/signal, doomers."
Like a lot of people I assumed Flynn was with us. Something told me to go back and read the Q posts about Flynn. What is the logical path Q is leading us down?
For example in 1008 Q says Mueller is going after inside plants. Q directly says Manafort and Carter Page are plants. So if Mueller is going after someone what does that make them?
Then in 3790, with 2043 embedded, isn’t the message the FISA warrants were rubber bullets that were never intended to permanently harm the official target? They were a clever way to spy on the real targets without having to ask the FISA court for those people. And back in post 1282 it doesn’t make sense that Flynn would take a bullet unless he knew it was a rubber bullet.
Read the Flynn drops with fresh eyes, see what you think.
So when Flynn and his family did the WWG1WGA pledge on video, do you think they were all just big fans of the movie White Squall?
When the reporter asked Flynn about Q, do you think he really had no idea what it was?
Remember, Flynn is suing the NYT over the topic of Q. He has to say certain things right now.
That’s the point, fren. He’s subtly supported and provided nods toward the movement, but when cornered he has always denied and deflected. This is no different.
Plausible deniability.
Fair point, but if Flynn is not involved with Q himself, it'd be hard for him to deny the legitimacy of the only source in the world who accurately predicted judge Emmet Sullivan's resignation.
Eyes on the trial today!!
A few might have adhd. We need to roam free in thought.
Doesn't anyone get the feeling that these semantical arguments between anons are being used to divide us?
100%. But we did communicate with a little more fire at times.
"Wait til you find out who's been talking to you here"
I can't wait to find out who was talking to us. Lol Sorry this is a bit unrelated but that the quote this post made me think of.
Sorry to mess up your 17 updoot score but I thought the same thing. And I often think of that and can't wait to find out myself!
Exactly. He knows “QAnon” is bullshit, he has never shit on Q or disavowed Q.
This 💯💯
👆
Could be possible that Flynn and Wood are working together to create a news cycle
I dont think so. The heat is real and so is the current separation.
Not about profit. Could just be about getting MSM to talk about them even in a negative way. Some people have never heard of Flynn or Wood. MSM might open some eyes without indenting to.
Ignore the noise focus on the signal
Patrick Byrne claims Hillary Clinton's former lawyer is working with Sidney Powell and Byrne implies that he may have sabotaged many of the court cases. That's just noise?
Do you trust Patrick Byrne?
Well that's the point... Can we trust Patrick Byrne? If what he says is true we have a problem. If what he says is a lie we have a problem. Either way we have snakes to root out. But we can't talk about it because "rah rah NCSWIC, sun tzu, noise/signal, doomers."
Who is Lin Wood Call?
Asking the real questions... 😆😆😆
A beard doesn’t look good on him......! Makes him look much older....!
WWG1WGA
Like a lot of people I assumed Flynn was with us. Something told me to go back and read the Q posts about Flynn. What is the logical path Q is leading us down?
For example in 1008 Q says Mueller is going after inside plants. Q directly says Manafort and Carter Page are plants. So if Mueller is going after someone what does that make them?
Then in 3790, with 2043 embedded, isn’t the message the FISA warrants were rubber bullets that were never intended to permanently harm the official target? They were a clever way to spy on the real targets without having to ask the FISA court for those people. And back in post 1282 it doesn’t make sense that Flynn would take a bullet unless he knew it was a rubber bullet.
Read the Flynn drops with fresh eyes, see what you think.
So what's this all about; General Flynn says Q doesn't exist?
Words are important. He said QAnon doesnt exist. And he is right....there is no QAnon . That's what the point is. There is Q and we Anons
His text message said Q, not Qanon.
Just a reminder:
Didn't he qanon which we know doesn't exist?