1
we_kill_creativity 1 point ago +1 / -0

I didn't ask you if you've been to Voat. I asked why do you think you (the community) were sent there?

1
we_kill_creativity 1 point ago +1 / -0

and even the JQ surprisingly enough.

Why do you think you were sent to Voat?

6
we_kill_creativity 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not if we correct it. I personally am enraged that correcting it hasn't happened yet, but it still can be done. As utterly frustrating as it is, if this does have a happy ending, then I can actually see the wisdom in doing it this way. There have been aspects of this going on far longer than 2016. It would be a real shame to ruin all those efforts just to "hurry it up". There's no one in the world who wants this done faster than I do. I can confidently say that.

2
we_kill_creativity 2 points ago +2 / -0

This shit is so big and has so many people involved that it wouldn't surprise me to find out wikileaks was part of the wh plan.

The plan was to show everyone the truth. There have been insiders who have wanted to do the Q plan for thousands of years. But they couldn't...until they had someone who could show it to the masses.

Part of the control structure we're fighting is fame. Fame is controlled by the people we're fighting. With fame comes power. That's why they've always had to control fame.

What if someone was offered fame, but declined it? That would be the moment of opportunity good insiders needed to expose the control system.

Because that person, left to their own devices, would be able to achieve fame outside of "their" control. He'd be a loose cannon and "they" couldn't have that. So "they" would do everything "they" could to control that person.

So what if that person was known to military intelligence? How wouldn't they be, military intelligence would know who that person is before that person would.

The WH's would have to contact this person, or else that person would have no chance. If the WH's didn't work with this person, "they" would use all their tricks to control him and he'd still be their pawn even if that guy didn't want to.

So...that guy says "Let them do what they always do to guys like me, but let the whole world see it. Let the whole world understand it." And thus the Q plan was born.

What would you say some of the main Q themes are? Pedophilia, child abuse, mkultra type shit...? All the things that guy would have been subjected to, in order to control him, and now, because of Q, the whole world understands it.

That's why I had to do v/pizzagate3.

Do some research on v/pizzagate3, my username, and Q, and you'll start to understand why any of this happened.

9
we_kill_creativity 9 points ago +9 / -0

I sincerely believe pizzagate was a pre-Q White Hat operation to figure out what would happen to Q type info on the internet. Where would "they" successfully squash the coms and research? Where would the pre-Q annons on various parts of the internet successfully stop "they" from squashing it?

Those two places were the rather well known chans, and the less well known Voat, where team Q sent the newly minted Q-annons after the Great Awakening subreddit got banned.

Before any large scale military operation certain people have to go in first and carry out their missions before anyone is really looking for it. That had to be done in this case as well. Voat is a lot more important than most people realize. It's importance is beyond pizzagate, or being the place team Q sent you after reddit.

You can look it up yourselves, but there was one website the chans raided where it not only didn't work, the original members didn't even realize it happened. That site was Voat. At Voat we figured out how the internet worked, how to make trends happen on mainstream social media. We even figured out how to sway the chans without them realizing it.

Why do you think the chans were chosen as the Q platform? Who were they watching before they chose that?

5
we_kill_creativity 5 points ago +5 / -0

Anonymous media boot camp. But yes, it was a boot camp. Pizzagate happened before Q. The people who did Q had to figure out where that kind of information could find a home. It found a home on Voat. That's important to understand.

2
we_kill_creativity 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, 2020vision think mirror: http://www.thexradio.com/news/78-local-news/24569-vision-2020-has-been-great-now-what

Why would I be able to find that ?

We're at a crossroads....literally: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cross_at_the_Crossroads

Why would I be able to find that?

What kind of crossroads? A crossroads of opportunity: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/fd/ba/b3/fdbab3cb3642275dad5e6abba1bef30d.jpg

Why would I be able to find that?

You're watching a movie? : https://files.catbox.moe/x7xxhx.png

https://files.catbox.moe/dn5ajm.png

https://files.catbox.moe/nhoym1.png

Why would I be able to find that?

https://www.ncta.com/media/media-room/nations-most-innovative-educators-honored-for-contributions-education

https://files.catbox.moe/u4z5nb.png

From the same article: https://files.catbox.moe/q91xfj.png

Again, how am I finding all this?

One of those teachers: https://www.nnstoy.org/stoy/joe-fatheree/

One of the top 10 global teachers of the year: https://ilprincipals.org/presenter/86/#:~:text=Additionally%2C%20he%20was%20named%20the,%2C%20innovation%2C%20and%20teacher%20leadership.

Now...for the rest of the story...

When r/GreatAwakening got banned from reddit, where did team Q send you all? To Voat.

And that's really fucking important.

Why do you think they sent you to Voat? My username is a clue.

1
we_kill_creativity 1 point ago +1 / -0

The enemy would like to know as much about this person as they can, so they didn't want to specify their gender. The post is talking about who has the full picture. They mention a, singular operator, who has the full picture. The kind of person you are talking about would not have that information.

They are dialed in with order specific to their mission based on their shared knowledge of the full picture.

The grammar of this line:

Outside of a potential operator who has been dialed-in w/ orders (specific to his/her mission) nobody else has this information.

only makes sense if that potential operator has the same information as:

the people who have the full picture

3
we_kill_creativity 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm just going to copy/paste my response to someone who made a similar argument:

I think Q is using the term "operator" in the generic sense. He's referring to any potential "special operators"

If that were the case they would have just "outside of potential operators". They specifically said "a" singular operator and the post is about the people who have a birds eye view of the plan.

I'm not trying to be rude, but grammatically you take isn't correct, and, as we know, details are important.

General "special operators" wouldn't be in on the initial plan, nor would they "have the full scope", which is what that post says that potential operator has.

2
we_kill_creativity 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Q is using the term "operator" in the generic sense. He's referring to any potential "special operators"

If that were the case they would have just said "outside of potential operators". They specifically said "a" singular operator and the post is about the people who have a birds eye view of the plan.

I'm not trying to be rude, but grammatically you take isn't correct, and, as we know, details are important.

General "special operators" wouldn't be in on the initial plan, nor would they "have the full scope", which is what that post says that potential operator has.

2
we_kill_creativity 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most actors are controlled, that's a given, and doesn't really pertain to what this post is about.

A movie about making a movie about a war and everyone's an actor. I happen to think that the Q plan was created around the time this movie came out.

3
we_kill_creativity 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you, but no. It was an hour long or so, and was just a video of him giving a live presentation to a group of people. I've looked through rumble and have never found it, It's really frustrating because it might be the perfect video to show an older person regarding Q/annons.

2
we_kill_creativity 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, if you go to qalerts.app, there are alot of Q posts that link to things that no longer exist.

3
we_kill_creativity 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's a start, I know those, but Q reposted several movie posters that aren't on the internet anymore. Do you know what I'm talking about?

2
we_kill_creativity 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do you really not understand that there is no "virus", that there never ever has been a "pandemic", and that the idea that there's a "super duper cover up that lit leaked from wuhan" is nothing more than diversion from the FACT that there's no pandemic whatsoever...?

You're an unwitting useful idiot with a post like this. Sorry, not sorry...

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›