Fox News (x) / out of control - sample,
NY Post,
Newsmax (@ executive level),
InfoWars / Alex Jones (100% compromised),
OANN (?) / very likely yes,
David Icke (?) / this I find hard to believe, if someone knows more please let me know. If someone has met him personally, message me.
And more (parler? quackquack?)
who do you trust besides (-Q-) and POTUS?
Doing something which might be important a bit down the line, so please contribute if you're so inclined. Welcome all suggestions/opinions/debates.
We all answer to someone, our supervisors, our spouses, our customers. We are generally all able to see the truth. Thing is even if we stand nearby, there is a somewhat different perspective. Trust in God, yes. Otherwise, take everything with a grain of salt. My many years of experience seems to help for me.
Independent researchers and journalists are the way to go.
I check out different podcasts... whitney webb, higher side chats...
No one right all the time...
Any recs for independent journos welcome...
For News, I trust theDonald.win. For News Outlets, I fully trust The Epoch Times and NTDTV. And they‘ve never let me down, and seeing how the ET truly values „Truth and Tradition“, and has made their news available for free for a time during this critical time, I think I can keep trusting them. I really get the vibes that it‘s about getting the truth out, and not a narrative or making money for them.
There's a lot of existing tools that deal with webs/chains of trust, used for things like SSL certificates and other crypto related stuff primarily. The premise being that once you designate someone as trustworthy, who they say is trustworthy also becomes so in your estimation (to a lesser extent), and so on down the line.
I could see a system like this fitting up against media info & disinfo agents like a glove.. if you assume a General Flynn and POTUS are trustworthy for example, and then start to mesh out from that point.
With that paradigm I think the various Q reporters, analysers and researchers would rank very highly. By contrast media would not rate a mention anywhere.. what trust does any group have who have lied consistently? But this can still be valuable - if a group is reliably unreliable, then wise people would perhaps place a trust score on the inverted meaning of whatever CNN say about any given topic. If they swear something is safe/legal, then you can probably be quite sure its likely dangerous and criminal etc.
OANN? icke? Heard Alex Jones maybe. Is he illuminati? The rest yes!
OANN has received suspicious funding over its course. As I have not had any confirmation (or contact) from anyone at OANN, it's just an assumption at this time. Hence the question mark.
David Icke is confusing because there are many that tell me he is deliberately pushing misinfo (people who are otherwise right on most of this stuff as far as I can tell) but the things he says do not at all sound to be misleading (the big stuff). The details where there are contradictions, he could very easily be misled or just simply have a different perspective.
Alex Jones is indeed Illuminati (low level henchman).
https://greatawakening.win/ is completely compromised. u/catsfive is confirmed to be a deep state operative. The COMPMAT they have on him was said to have made Hunter Biden vomit, and go on a total crack binge for a couple of days after he saw it.
These people are sick.
We can only trust Fredrick Brennan.
More comms in the coming days.
Stay strapped and keep your head on a swivel.
Then you have nothing to worry about. Right, new account that was created two hours ago?
Tell your pals at the Lincoln Project we said hi.
You are literally a Satan worshipping pedophile.
I can tell you're a cunt by your unnecessary use of the word "literally"
science