Wish I knew for sure as well :) But 'research' is what we do here.

I LOVE what he says, he really seems to know his intelligence stuff, yet I do have reservations. He sounds like a good analyst with experience. Yet e.g., Thomas Wictor was never in WWI, but he sounds like an expert, as if he was there, just through study alone.

But first and hugely important - I feel he's definitely not ‘JFK Jr.’

If you listen to Juan O’Savin’s speech patterns, there's an ingrained regional accent or twang there (in the background), that has no referents to JFK Jr.'s 'mid-Atlantic' / American-international English.

JFk Jr. didn't have time to pick up his dad's Massachusetts accent, and though he was a New Yorker, he also grew up on Skorpios, the Greek island, amid an international milieu. So his speech was kind of unique.

And though Juan does do that sort of gravelly voice-catch thing that JFK Jr. sometimes had, his sort of ‘western’ background accent shines through beneath it. I’m not sure JFK would have completely changed to a regional accent, even if he had lived there under cover for years.

I also feel it’s unconscionable to hint at, or even -allow- any impression that he’s JFK Jr. Manipulation is way more a trait of the unfortunately-devolved ds. It’s really disrespectful.

So even if he’s allowing this idea for a noble purpose (to interest people so he can get more truth out), I feel this unethical aspect puts a big question mark on him.

But I also have to say again, I love listening to him, he’s very skillful and he ‘seems’ to have a good, altruistic heart;

‘After we help America, we’re going to help the world - not as Our Brother’s Keeper, but as our Brother’s Brother.’ His sincere altruistic thoughts like that, really resonate.

Also he name-drops having alleged high-level contacts a lot. But many times his contacts are other conspiracy personalities. A sort of endless circle of mutual reinforcement. And if I were ds, I'd try to feed disinfo specifically to the identified ‘thought leaders’, with or without their knowledge and cooperation.

And he has his own, highly elaborated belief system about the nature and origins of the ds. Like we all do. So are his ideas more valid than anyone’s? It’s almost getting down to, ‘what is the nature of truth? Does each of us generate our own ‘holodeck’ in some way?

So in answer to your great question, I want him and Simon Parkes and Robert David Steele to be genuine. I want the vision they present to be the truth. So maybe that even helps load the quantum probability dice, or something. :)

The practical side says, reserve judgement, don’t follow anyone blindly. But also, draw encouragement and resonance from wherever you find it. Like in that scripture that says all things are working together for good, vs. the ds's keeping on getting boomeranged by their own plots.

Maybe we’re just all dealing with one another as fallible human beings. Personality vs. Soul. I mean, look at President Trump. Maybe the whole human race itself, is getting ready for some sort of great awakening or next step. And so we're just wading through lots of uncertainty and 'chaos on the edge of creativity'.

Maybe we can mostly just try to develop & go by an intuitive sense of ‘Goodness’ or something like that. And practice what St. Paul says, ‘Test everything. And retain what is good.’ Even though we may make mistakes in discernment, maybe it's bigger than we are. Maybe we can't lose.