30pm
Inventor and data analyst Jovan Hutton Pulitzer released a report showing numerous countries interfered in the 2020 election. Pulitzer insists the only solution to see the real winners of the 2020 election at all levels is to forensically audit the ballots.
How is it this guy can't seem to figure out how to link to a PDF? The guy is directing traffic that wants to read his report to some social networking site called "MeWe" and to top it off, that site doesn't work either. It's like pulling teeth trying to get to the bottom of this bullshit. After all his work and he can't seem to be able to put out the information correctly, frustrating.
MeWe is the new “free speech” Facebook for boomers. They’ve probably gotten a lot of traffic this last week like Gab did.
I don’t care. Where’s a direct link? I’m not signing up for more crap hosted on cloudflare right now. Wait where are we hosted?
Mewe aint too shabby, all the people who migrated from G+ went there.
Right? The link was down for me anyway. Just download the dang pdf and share directly. I do appreciate the update, but why make us all jump through hoops?
I wish they would audit NC - Biden came to NC to endorse Cooper. NC voted republican ticket but Cooper seemed to have won again.
I/3 of the WORLD's countries conspired to screw us in some way.
I don't know what else to say. This surprised even me. And I've been doing this for 3 decades. Wow.
can someone post the link to download the pdf of his findings? i tried to register to mewe but it does not work.
https://gofile.io/d/XKMGMi
thank you!
You sure this is the report that Jovan wrote? It has a lot of information that would be outside of his scope of research. He's just mainly working on finding fake ballots and any other anomalies associated with ballots. This report goes into a lot of other issues. Just wondering? It kind of reads like something Navarro would put out.
You may be correct. I downloaded from his MeWe after someone mentioned MeWe here. Not sure if it was the same as the OPs link.
Also, I may have accidentally downloaded this 17 times by tapping the download link repeatedly when it didn't work at first. Just realized that after someone pointed it out. So the title of the document will just be a coincidence
Thank you! This is a very Jovan Pulitzer report. This was also the same report dopes here were claiming was DNI report to Congress. ?♂️
Good report. The best part is the proposed solution that starts to look like what is brewing... especially in regards to DHS and NG... maybe insert FEMA somewhere into this proces....
"DHS will use their emergency response logistic capabilities to support the effort. They will integrate the IT support that will include separating out the legal from the counterfeit ballots and communications with all supporting the effort and cameras (Possibly cell phones) imaging each and every ballot. These images will be distributed to the Internet.
▪ The federalized National Guard in each state will be supplied detailed processes and be responsible for counting each legitimate paper ballot. Teams made up of three (first couple counties will be five) National Guard members will do the counting. As the counting occurs each ballot will be imaged and the images placed on the Internet so any US citizen can view them and count the ballots themselves. The process will be completely transparent"
Hol Lee Sheet ... now we just need his plan accepted by the FEMA overlords.
I KNEW Minnesota was rigged as well! Look at what Veritas dug up on Omar and her little minions ballot harvesting, and NOTHING was done to stop her!
Cant someone download it and put it here.
https://gofile.io/d/XKMGMi
This link works!
Did anyone else see the title of the document? Congressional_Election_Fraud_Briefing_4JAN2021+(1)(17).pdf
I may have accidentally downloaded this 17 times from his MeWe account.... It wasn't downloading, so I kept tapping the link. Sorry for the hopium. This was a coincidence
Ha!!! Dang it!
Yeah. That’s a very unprofessional report for a congressional briefing but it looks very much like Pulitzers work.
Link is down for me right now. Anyone have a backup of the report?
I read this last night - and I'm sorry but I didn't see the 'evidence'. I saw a good hypothesis of how the fraud happened - but not the evidence.
I don't trust this guy!!! WHY IS HE NOT BANNED EVERYWHERE?
Banning people is a shill tactic and obviously Left ideology. If they don’t agree with me and my echochamber then they are a threat to democracy. Thank you for outing yourself.
Are you Jovan? What in the hell are you talking about? Everyone claiming voter fraud has been purged and yet this guy "hacks the election live" and keeps rambling without pushback. I am talking about JOVAN being banned from talking about election fraud. Take your downvotes back you baboons. REALLY? WHAT HAPPENED TO CRITICAL THINKING? WHY IS HE ALLOWED TO SPEW ELECTION FRAUD?? For those that are still confused, I was asking why is Jovan not banned from EVERYWHERE? I was not talking about OP.
Critical thinking. Don't over do it
I think I understood you, you were being facetious. Not sure why he isn't banned, optics maybe? Don't ban, but bury the report so no one can see it.
You should trust him he’s on your side, and his ability is well established, do your research
I'm just saying this guy dropped right in the middle of it and seems to be spearheading the fraud narrative. I do hope he's cool, but trying to point out that CRITICAL THINKING above hopium will keep us out of the re-education camps.
I (respectfully) disagree with "dropped right in the middle of it". I'd characterize it more of "flying under the radar".
He's been working on it for months, and has been posting his claims in various places. There's just been so much noise that it's hard to track. I saw what I think are his first videos a week or two after the election.
Also, he's a bit on the geeky side, so he's had some "PR issues" regarding communicating his approach (like drowning "Normie" congress-people in minor details), but he's been getting a lot better (especially after the GA Legislator presentation). Plus, most attention was focused on somehow reversing Hammer/Scorecard (via forensic accounting) at the time, whereas by comparison his stuff seemed blaise / mundane. He's also made some presentation mistakes that have allowed Democratic congress people derail him somewhat in questioning.
Also, he's been faced with a complete stonewall of litigation / bullshit, which have really taken the luster off. Election Officials have been doing whatever they can to drag their feet and ignore him.
Technically, I think he's 100% dead-on with his science of "compression chromatography" (or however it's spelled). 100% proof of if a ballot went through the mail, and if a ballot was filled out by a pen or by a printer, and completely detectible from a standard camera ... just needs access to the data that is SUPPOSED to be PUBLIC RECORD according to THE LAW (sorry for caps, it's just fucking infuriating). I haven't read the .pdf yet (trying to download it now...)
And yes, there's a bit of self-aggrandization in his manner, but frankly, that swagger is needed to get these congress-people to trust you.
Point taken. I am not against him by any means, just trying to keep everyone grounded as I am sure some of the people involved will prove to be "planted" to take the investigation "into the woods" and make all the other people that have a genuine point look kooky and discredit them.
Good point, and I appreciate your caution. But take a look into his science and see if your opinion changes :)
Frankly, I'd love his tech to be further explored/confirmed and adopted widely ... he may not be the answer now, but could be a longer-term improvement to the system, going forward.
Do research on who he is and have faith
Like I saId he has a long well established reputation
What the hell are you talking about? How about I trust Biden or Brennan? They are well established. Muller too. Pelosi looks great and I might even go with Brian Kemp for President. I really don't think I should trust someone just because he's claiming to be on my side? Really poor argument
Your not doing your research
Long established reputation in tech, he is no dummy.
Yes, check Hillary Clinton - long standing political career. Everything she says must be true...