Moving to a gold standard and abolishing the federal reserve (which is owned by the Rothschild's, Rockefeller, and a few more families) was going to be done around 1963 timeframe. The person planning to make that happened was assinated!
1-15 is monetary system restructuring. though expect lawsuits from people who paid off their mortgages and student loans based on fraudulent LIBOR rates.
the additional items are ideals that sound good on paper but who makes the decisions, and how do you measure them? think this through.
in a sound money system, money supply is related to productivity.
Something that benefits every single person is a benefit to every single person. Just because it benefits some more than others doesn't take away from the universal benefit.
Every system that goes out of its way to "be fair," inevitably is not for someone, and overly complicates that system. If you want to ruin a system, make it overly complicated (have we learned nothing?) A system that is non-discriminatory and universally beneficial seems pretty good to me, even though I, like you, have almost no debt.
of course you can cancel debt, it's not even a new idea.
Debt is not real money it's an artificial construct.
A bank does NOT need to have any "money" to "loan" to you.
Your signature on a contract called a Credit Agreement authorises the bank to create credit in your name,
When you spend it it becomes "money".
If you "borrow" 200K to buy a house, for example, the bank will credit your account at the time of signature and you have "money" to purchase the house.
You buy the house with those funds and take possession of the house.
The seller of the house is now paid in full. You have a house and a 200K debt with interest added.
Now, if all debts are cancelled, who loses ?
Those with a strong knee-jerk reaction might say that the banks will lose 200k, but as I described above,
The banks did not loan you their own cash, they simply handled the paperwork and typed in the numbers into a computer.
However, because the banks are utterly fraudulent by design, they have been allowed to use your credit as their assets and have gambled with this fictitious credit.
It won't matter the old system is designated for replacement, with all debt being cancelled and Treasury money based on Nationally owned assets will replace the current system.
Okay I can see the road and i like it, just thinking in my mind about the frugal people, whom have lived frugally, all vehicles used so they could work on them, themselves, saved for years and bought a small lot of land then built a really small home over time. The guy next door has massive debt, mcmansion, the best newest vehicles, etc.
The small frugal property is better in my opinion because of the debt load being zero. I'm sure some feels would be stepped on if the "shortcut" taken by the guy in the mcmansion with tons of debt that was then forgiven, and now both have zero debt, except only one of those people worked their entire lives to be debt free.
What about renters, and people or corporations with massive ammounts of property? Is the guy who has 20 mortgages he pays with "renters funds" debts forgiven while the renter still owes rent?
Don't get it twisted i would still love to see this happen, but I don't see how it could ever be fair?
Levelling the playing field will affect each of us differently,
I paid off my mortgage a while back after spending almost my entire life re-paying it, so I won't gain personally from this one issue,
however if you look at the other positives, we will all benefit from the new world that is imminent.
I have no idea how the renters vs owners issue will be resolved, but in the bigger picture, it's a small issue.
The owners are also likely to have loans too, which will be cancelled as well.
The current legal systems are up for review and change. Perhaps that will resolve the Lease (renters) vs Title (Owners) question.
Just pointing out probable arguments, personally i believe we need this even without giving everyone money. Remove fiat standard, make money real again, remove income tax and watch everything grow massively
Can we have NESARA in Europe, please? Asking for a friend.
That project is also in place, it's known as GESARA
N is National, G is Global
It will begin in the USA, as the "owner" of the Fed Res. and be propagated world-wide.
That'll be GESARA, the global variant
We live in hope!
My thoughts, too.
When I was first learning about this... I'm like wait a minute, I just used all my stimulus to pay off the remainder of what I owed!
Now... Cut my taxes and I'm all in!
Moving to a gold standard and abolishing the federal reserve (which is owned by the Rothschild's, Rockefeller, and a few more families) was going to be done around 1963 timeframe. The person planning to make that happened was assinated!
I don’t think your debt will be wiped out specifically.
I think it’s more like this:
Seize all the stolen wealth, image at least a quadrillion dollars
Pay of national debt
Divide rest amongst the population.
You’ll have enough money to pay off all your debts and then some for a house and a car or whatever you want to do with your life.
1-15 is monetary system restructuring. though expect lawsuits from people who paid off their mortgages and student loans based on fraudulent LIBOR rates.
the additional items are ideals that sound good on paper but who makes the decisions, and how do you measure them? think this through.
in a sound money system, money supply is related to productivity.
When it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. I'd just like my kids to have the same liberties I did.
I dunno where it's been said that NESARA WILL be implemented, but it certainly seems like a better alter native than what we have right now.
what are your ideas regarding a replacement financial system ?
Well, we have to do something if we want to take down the world's rulers.
Without their banking and zero ideas of what to do, the world would fall into disarray.
Those who have a plan will be better off if shit goes down.
It certainly seems like Russia is prepared for that, since they have more gold than dollars apparently now.
what is a non starter ?
Something that benefits every single person is a benefit to every single person. Just because it benefits some more than others doesn't take away from the universal benefit.
Every system that goes out of its way to "be fair," inevitably is not for someone, and overly complicates that system. If you want to ruin a system, make it overly complicated (have we learned nothing?) A system that is non-discriminatory and universally beneficial seems pretty good to me, even though I, like you, have almost no debt.
of course you can cancel debt, it's not even a new idea. Debt is not real money it's an artificial construct. A bank does NOT need to have any "money" to "loan" to you. Your signature on a contract called a Credit Agreement authorises the bank to create credit in your name, When you spend it it becomes "money". If you "borrow" 200K to buy a house, for example, the bank will credit your account at the time of signature and you have "money" to purchase the house. You buy the house with those funds and take possession of the house. The seller of the house is now paid in full. You have a house and a 200K debt with interest added. Now, if all debts are cancelled, who loses ? Those with a strong knee-jerk reaction might say that the banks will lose 200k, but as I described above, The banks did not loan you their own cash, they simply handled the paperwork and typed in the numbers into a computer. However, because the banks are utterly fraudulent by design, they have been allowed to use your credit as their assets and have gambled with this fictitious credit. It won't matter the old system is designated for replacement, with all debt being cancelled and Treasury money based on Nationally owned assets will replace the current system.
Fiat vs Real.
Okay I can see the road and i like it, just thinking in my mind about the frugal people, whom have lived frugally, all vehicles used so they could work on them, themselves, saved for years and bought a small lot of land then built a really small home over time. The guy next door has massive debt, mcmansion, the best newest vehicles, etc. The small frugal property is better in my opinion because of the debt load being zero. I'm sure some feels would be stepped on if the "shortcut" taken by the guy in the mcmansion with tons of debt that was then forgiven, and now both have zero debt, except only one of those people worked their entire lives to be debt free.
What about renters, and people or corporations with massive ammounts of property? Is the guy who has 20 mortgages he pays with "renters funds" debts forgiven while the renter still owes rent?
Don't get it twisted i would still love to see this happen, but I don't see how it could ever be fair?
Levelling the playing field will affect each of us differently, I paid off my mortgage a while back after spending almost my entire life re-paying it, so I won't gain personally from this one issue, however if you look at the other positives, we will all benefit from the new world that is imminent. I have no idea how the renters vs owners issue will be resolved, but in the bigger picture, it's a small issue. The owners are also likely to have loans too, which will be cancelled as well.
The current legal systems are up for review and change. Perhaps that will resolve the Lease (renters) vs Title (Owners) question.
Who told you that life was fair?
Just pointing out probable arguments, personally i believe we need this even without giving everyone money. Remove fiat standard, make money real again, remove income tax and watch everything grow massively
In there somewhere is the value of a dollar
Germany did exactly that after WW2. A debt jubilee.
Was alright signed by Clinton, and was suppose to be announced on... get this... September 11th, 2001.
https://www.change.org/p/supreme-court-washington-d-c-announce-nesara-now-the-law-exist-hasn-t-been-announce-as-it-was-ordered-and-scheduled-to-be-announced