I know he believes Q and his videos are full of some good hopium but I have also seen that he believes he has fathered an alien baby, like what’s that about?
Comments (36)
sorted by:
Claimed to speak to Q; "No outside comms".
In the words of caller ID: "Scam likely"
SimonParkes.org for those who don't follow him. I follow him. And 8kun and Q and Alex. And EWillHelpYou and GhostEzra.
Then I make up my own mind.
I appreciate him.
Most valid cristism I have yet; i.e. git deported.
Trash
Deception. The man is having sex with Fallen Angels/Devils who come in disguise as "Aliens".
Steer Clear if you know what's good for you. Keep your eyes on the prize. Just my personal opinion.
I find hes very informative and unlike those below trashing him his info does actually turn out to be true. It would seem to me instead of trashing people that are trying to help you should start listening to them and understanding them. Charlie Steels also verifies that Simone is connected and a great person.
He fucks aliens...that has cat ears...his favorite alien he calls "mum" and looks to her as a mother figure..Now what do you think?...Is he credible? Or, perhaps bat shit crazy? It's an IQ test... what score do you believe someone should achieve by holding Simon Parkes as a credible source?
Most people think he's nuts, it seems. I think he's doing some pretty over-the-top misdirection, but it sounds like his info is all second-or-third-hand. I think he can sometimes give a pretty good view on things, but there are better sources.
Can you list some sources you trust?
Trust? No, not really anything falls completely in that category, except God alone. If it's not revealed to your or confirmed by God, then it's always suspect. Some sources have been more frequently verifiable. Q, for example, is better, but due to its nature and own admissions of optics and disinformation, I have to assume about a 50% rate of misdirection. Any other credible source should be the same.
Most of these things can only be known when looking behind us. It's just like the Revelation of St John. We can speculate, even get a general grasp of the type of things to come, but their form and manner can only be certainly known when we see them, and even then the certainty required God's confirmation to be firm.
I tried... and a few people I know send me his stuff... but I just get a bad vibe from him. I'm not an authority on anyone... keep in mind, but him and the other bald British dude who said Trump put "Quantum Watermarks" on the ballots.... just sorta eye roll central for me.
But for all we know Trump is feeding them information, but it could be dis info also.... who knows at this point.
Arent you going to feel like a fool when you find out there actually is water marks on the ballots. Thats why they tried to get judges to let them get to the ballots. All Trump ballots were thrown out and replaced with fraudulent ballots that do not have that water mark.
:P I mean.. I don't know if you are trolling me.. .or being serious...
I hope you are right... I really do.
yeah, that sort of thing doesn't really fly here on TGA.win. Never watched him, but based on comments folks here view him with a jaundiced eye.
I agree with your Jaundiced Eye remark. Take everybody's summaries and combine them into something which makes sense. Sure Simon believes in little green men, but he seems pretty confident in Q stuff. So does Praying Medic, X22, IPOT, Monkeywerx, and Salty Cracker. Their beliefs should not be taken as gospel, but if they agree on similar points then one can figure out that they are on the correct path to the truth. If Simon has information and is corroborated by others, why not accept his information as "good". Don't toss his ideas out just because he got jiggy with a nine foot, four fingered green space alien.
LOL. Agreed. Everyone has a little bit of the puzzle, and the fact that they are willing to take the time to share their thoughts and realizations is really outstanding. Like you said, we need to use discernment and our own counsel regarding the things we hear and what feels right in the context of everything we've already learned. I didn't dismiss Simon. I've actually never watched him But if his Q insights contain useful intel, then it would be foolish to shut him out.
Ex British politician, therefore a seasoned, skill-full liar.
I watched a few of his vids. I'm thinking he doesn't feed his pets often because his cats and dogs are always doing that little dance in his face, the one they do when they are hungry. Seems like a cool guy. His predictions are usually the ones that you have likely thought through as likely yourself with an 80% chance of likelihood, or in some cases he'll drop info other folks like him are already saying and I've heard before. His stuff seems to mirror Steve Pieczenik. I have a neutral opinion.
Like everyone else... history will show that he was right sometimes.
I never listened to a full cast or gave him a fair shot but that was because after 5 minutes of listening/watching him I felt he was not to be trusted. There are some people worth giving a fair chance, in my opinion, he was not one of them. Anybody that presents info like it is inside info is usually full of shit.
the right way