Melania's message has 2 cuts to the side, for 10s and 7s totaling 17.
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (45)
sorted by:
Again!! Wtf! How many coincidences before it's undeniable!!
(To newbies, remember Trump's recent non-concession video from the WH? It had exactly a 17 second camera cut in the middle)
Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet. It's used as a hint in a lot of proofs and things. Keep up!
Always ask questions if there is something you don't understand, no matter how simple. Other people who are new may see your question and the answer and learn, it also may remind someone who has been through it all of something they've forgotten about and trigger a new connection/decode. Anyone who belittles you for asking are the kind of people who leave 10% tips anyway.
You know... the thing... 17.
I wondered about the cuts...that makes more sense! The side view was saying something...great catch!
I think I'm spending too much time on this board...
Something's off about her ears imo...
I can't recall how hair moves atm either...
...Time for a break methinks.
Violence can be justified. Our military uses justified violence frequently. Police officers do the same. People protecting others from harm use justified violence and the lord has commanded his people to use righteous violence on more than one occasion.
The war on violence needs to stop, and refocus on criminality instead. Leave my violence alone. Thank you, that is all. :-)
Damn you're good at this!!
what?
2 switches to side views from the camera. The first view lasted for 10 seconds. The second view switch lasted for 7 seconds. Total is 17 seconds and the 17th letter of the alphabet is Q.
I believe something similar happened with Trumps speech a few days ago.
Did you check into it deeper?
I agree, I just did my best, heard it all the same as you... Weirrrd,
Military Police Children Mothers
Anyone else notice how she went straight to covering all the things the left hates and wants to destroy?
Love her so much. What a wonderful, classy, caring woman. She did not get the positive media attention that she deserved.
For sure.
I see second cut beginning at 523: CHECKMATE
On first cut there is a Q on white column or pedestal or maybe just my imagination
I thought so too, but it's just a circle
Its actually something like 9.2 seconds, and 7.8 seconds, but the math works.
Seriously though, this numerology shit has to stop, it is beyond believable.
It looks like the 1st cut was 9 seconds, and the 2nd cut was 6 seconds.
Eh.. idk, it's not really precise, the first one is more like 9 seconds and some change, the second one is closer to 7, but not precise enough, it would have been surgical if it was the case
edit: well, I downloaded the video and went frame by frame in avidemux, and it seems the first cut is pretty precise on 10 seconds (not quite if taking into consideration the milliseconds), but the second one is more like 8 seconds, not 7
Well, doing the math on the times on the frames right before it cuts and the one right after, it amounted to 16.599, pretty close, one would say even close enough :P, only .4 tents of a second short of a perfect 17
Going frame by frame I got:
frames right after and before the end of the cut:
first cut start 00:01:57.951
first cut end 00:02:07.085
second cut start 00:05:23.906
second cut end 00:05:31.205
frames right before cut and one right after end of cut
first cut start 00:01:57.909
first cut end 00:02:07.126
second cut start 00:05:23.865
second cut end 00:05:31.247
So yeah... too close to be a coincidence I say.
That 4 tenths of a second accounts for human reaction time to switch a camera angle?
perhaps you could tell us why a face front speech was cut to the side view twice?
probably just a co-incidence.
I'm sure it isn't. Why are you in a pro Q forum again?