Still kind of have to wonder why he stayed on Twitter all these years, letting these left wing corporations have near total control over his ability to communicate.
That’s exactly what happened, and also, that ruling wasn’t only about “did the president have the authority to overturn a prior executive order.“ It had more to do with the specific executive order, Re: DACA
Fucking... Probably. It would be unprecedented for the same court to so blatantly play politics in such a short time, I'd imagine, but then again... I feel that pedophiles serving as chief justice is unprecedented as well.
They can if they find that some of the justices were compromised during the case. The new Justices are only bound by precedent via precedent. They have every right to re-rule on past cases if they see something egregious was overlooked.
Scotus said president doesn't have authority to "undo" previously issued EOs in the DACA case.
That... That might happen.
So then, signing EO's you know will reside in enemy territory would be really foolish.
Trump isn't foolish.
Still kind of have to wonder why he stayed on Twitter all these years, letting these left wing corporations have near total control over his ability to communicate.
only if you're a doomer
That’s exactly what happened, and also, that ruling wasn’t only about “did the president have the authority to overturn a prior executive order.“ It had more to do with the specific executive order, Re: DACA
Only if he remains as CJ Roberts, and is not ID'd as Lolita Express Roberts...
I believe that famous pic in the water is Roberts
Pics of him have also surfaced with G. Maxwell in his lap as well.
Just like obama had free range on immigration issues but Trump had his hands tied on the same
The same SCOTUS that has failed to uphold the constitution any time it mattered? Any POTUS can rescind an EO of any previous POTUS.
Naaaaaa handshake.... Replay the DACA one
Can they re-rule on that?
Fucking... Probably. It would be unprecedented for the same court to so blatantly play politics in such a short time, I'd imagine, but then again... I feel that pedophiles serving as chief justice is unprecedented as well.
Updoot fren.
They can if they find that some of the justices were compromised during the case. The new Justices are only bound by precedent via precedent. They have every right to re-rule on past cases if they see something egregious was overlooked.
So then, signing EO's you know will reside in enemy territory would be really foolish.
Trump isn't foolish.
I'm not sure I follow.