He should have showed us the video 10 hours before it started then. Now that would have been impressive. Or he could’ve said: “hey I saw how this ends... nobody gets arrested at the inauguration.”
If he did then he should show proof. Nothing these guys have said has come to pass from their 'sources'. They are either purposely misinforming or their 'sources' are.
Pretty sure Charlie and parkes are disinfo or looking to make a buck. My buddies daughter works for a Republican congressman and she attended yesterday.
Total larper. I posted this in another thread but I watched the inauguration live on WGN news in Chicago at my brother's place. One of their local reporters was there for hours before the ceremony talking live with the anchors, a local guy from their studio. You could see the military band setting up and preparations being made. I seriously doubt a smaller TV network with a local reporter would have been in on a plan like this, the WGN guy was talking live every few minutes with the desk anchors.
These British guys will say anything for clicks! If he really had it early, he could have shared it. Anyone can say anyting after the fact. I don't know why people keep giving these alien bangers clicks and views,
I don't believe it's over. Too much has happened and there are too many loose ends...but if the video was released 10 hours prior in any way, leaked, other countries, etc...Wouldn't we have seen it before it went live?
If it was pre-recorded, fine...but people claiming they had the recording prior to it going live sounds like BS. Why don't they share it? Why are these people only ever "in the know" after the fact? It's because they are full of shit. They aren't privy to anything special.
I have been pondering this for a while now and cannot see why it would be recorded before it went live. To what purpose? The whole thing seems awkward but that's because the participants know its a farce. But pre-recorded? Why? Anyone got any ideas?
Ask yourself: if it wasn't meant to come out why is he broadcasting it at all? Self promotion by the look of it. The more these guys quote "sources", the more my doubts grow. Parkes comes out with warnings that never come to pass. I am starting to think they are fakes.
Absolutely. I worked to get Brexit for years and tool a LOT of flak. I have a pretty good instinct for what is legit and who is credible. This is WAY more complex and takes much more careful analysis and discernment. Charlie is a genial chappie to be sure, but I don't trust him entirely, specially as he is selling stuff as well. The best conmen are the ones who are able to gain trust and can read people well enough to know what they want to hear. Careful who you follow is good advice.
Yes. This is why decent, trusting people cannot buy into the fact that they have been lied to, manipulated, controlled, betrayed and sold out for decades. The awekening process has been painful and slow for us but necessary for the normies. Many are still going to be in shock and denial when the final horrors are exposed. Once the anger reaction comes they will accept what's been going on. That will be the turning point. Some will stay in denial but will know in their hearts its true, their ego/pride won't let them admit it. Wondering how my family will react, I am hopeful, praying for healing for many who have been divided by all this.
He should have showed us the video 10 hours before it started then. Now that would have been impressive. Or he could’ve said: “hey I saw how this ends... nobody gets arrested at the inauguration.”
If he did then he should show proof. Nothing these guys have said has come to pass from their 'sources'. They are either purposely misinforming or their 'sources' are.
Charlie ward is only one saying this..
you think he would of made proof right?
Pretty sure Charlie and parkes are disinfo or looking to make a buck. My buddies daughter works for a Republican congressman and she attended yesterday.
Total larper. I posted this in another thread but I watched the inauguration live on WGN news in Chicago at my brother's place. One of their local reporters was there for hours before the ceremony talking live with the anchors, a local guy from their studio. You could see the military band setting up and preparations being made. I seriously doubt a smaller TV network with a local reporter would have been in on a plan like this, the WGN guy was talking live every few minutes with the desk anchors.
These British guys will say anything for clicks! If he really had it early, he could have shared it. Anyone can say anyting after the fact. I don't know why people keep giving these alien bangers clicks and views,
I don't believe it's over. Too much has happened and there are too many loose ends...but if the video was released 10 hours prior in any way, leaked, other countries, etc...Wouldn't we have seen it before it went live?
If it was pre-recorded, fine...but people claiming they had the recording prior to it going live sounds like BS. Why don't they share it? Why are these people only ever "in the know" after the fact? It's because they are full of shit. They aren't privy to anything special.
Time will tell I suppose, but I'm not buying it for now. Open mind if we see evidence of such tho.
That could easily be done through more credible channels, not a bloke who is constantly flogging gold and using his kid for patreon subs.
Let's hope so!
I have been pondering this for a while now and cannot see why it would be recorded before it went live. To what purpose? The whole thing seems awkward but that's because the participants know its a farce. But pre-recorded? Why? Anyone got any ideas?
The media had been getting Trumps pre recordings ahead of time and didn't talk about those early
Ask yourself: if it wasn't meant to come out why is he broadcasting it at all? Self promotion by the look of it. The more these guys quote "sources", the more my doubts grow. Parkes comes out with warnings that never come to pass. I am starting to think they are fakes.
Absolutely. I worked to get Brexit for years and tool a LOT of flak. I have a pretty good instinct for what is legit and who is credible. This is WAY more complex and takes much more careful analysis and discernment. Charlie is a genial chappie to be sure, but I don't trust him entirely, specially as he is selling stuff as well. The best conmen are the ones who are able to gain trust and can read people well enough to know what they want to hear. Careful who you follow is good advice.
Hm, seems the fake inauguration was pre-recorded. Dunno about Charlie getting it ahead of everyone else though.
Yes. This is why decent, trusting people cannot buy into the fact that they have been lied to, manipulated, controlled, betrayed and sold out for decades. The awekening process has been painful and slow for us but necessary for the normies. Many are still going to be in shock and denial when the final horrors are exposed. Once the anger reaction comes they will accept what's been going on. That will be the turning point. Some will stay in denial but will know in their hearts its true, their ego/pride won't let them admit it. Wondering how my family will react, I am hopeful, praying for healing for many who have been divided by all this.