1
Fellow_CatREEpiller 1 point ago +1 / -0

The thing is we pay enough now for "free" healthcare. We just send it in the billions overseas.

As an aside, I'm not sure what to do with healthcare. It's as corrupt as anything else. See: COVID-19. Suppressing science and being run by insurance and pharmaceutical companies. Inflating "COVID" deaths for the sake of the almighty dollar. Disgusting.

3
Fellow_CatREEpiller 3 points ago +3 / -0

They don't. Work in healthcare in a support role. I've been around too many candid conversations to believe that they give a shit about any of us. Not all of course...

12
Fellow_CatREEpiller 12 points ago +12 / -0

This here. They'll (reportedly, no personal exp) get him meds he needs rather than stick him on a vent and kill him.

1
Fellow_CatREEpiller 1 point ago +1 / -0

The video is similar to the courts not hearing the evidence claiming it was either to early or too late to hold water. Sucks doesn't it?

1
Fellow_CatREEpiller 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same. Best "not it."

4
Fellow_CatREEpiller 4 points ago +4 / -0

4-6% will be lost forever.

1
Fellow_CatREEpiller 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. Mining might have multiple forms, and I only know about it a conceptual level. Basically though, the computational power needed to validate to the ledger is notable. When you "sign up" to add your resources to the project of verifying transactions and whatnot your reward would generally be currency which you are benefiting. Energy into Profit essentially. Think of what they did with the Folding at Home project.

  2. I don't believe so. I think its just a model for structuring a program. I'm really not familiar with its core makeup. I only just understand this bit lol.

  3. I think it potentially cuts out the middle man if designed properly. In it's purest decentralized form it would be wholly owned by all. You wouldn't need a bank to clear transactions because your peer nodes clear and verify by the nature of the system. This is a utopian design tho IMO.

4
Fellow_CatREEpiller 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm no expert, but I'll try a few of these...hopefully it can give you some threads to pull on or someone else can build on/correct this....

  1. It depends on the coin. Bitcoin for instance has a finite amount and more will only be created slowly until it reaches that cap. Others have so much in circulation it really is worthless except out of it's engineered use. Think creating a crypto for a singular purpose...good example is video games creating their own currency to buy vanity items from their store. It has no value outside of that specific store. I'm not sure I see value in this...but it's there.

  2. I don't know the process of getting it recognized, but anyone with the programming understanding can create a new currency. Within that currency, as far as I know, the currency is earned by "mining" which is providing the computational power needed to validate the record on the chain. It gets more complicated here depending on the currency and what systems/programming they use to validate the record.

  3. This is the essence of digital currency. It's claimed to be immutable and CAN be anonymous. Each node on the blockchain network contains a complete ledger of the currency. I imagine this is like a map of every account and "coin". The point of the decentralized nature of blockchain is that it is protected from fraud and error because the computation have to validated in more than one place. Supposedly the only way to influence it is to take over the majority of nodes responsible for the computations (It can be designed in a central way as well, but I think the intent of the tech was decentralization).

  4. The few crypto I've looked into can be carried in multiple ways. You can havbe an online account as you probably do now. You can download them into a hardware wallet (think USB drive), or you can create paper with the addresses of the coin and account it resides. Its worth mentioning that you don't just have a human readable "account number" as you would a bank. It's more of an address.

  5. This is built into the blockchain tech. The system self regulates, but obviously if you start to talk people's life savings and not some meme coin there should be more assurances and understanding here.

  6. If the crypto is centralized, like a Facebook coin, that would be a concern. True decentralization would give power back to people, but it may also be a pipe dream.

  7. In this regard I feel our currency is already digital. If the store can't process payment we use cash. Ultimately if our infrastructure fails we'll be trading in goats either way right?

1
Fellow_CatREEpiller 1 point ago +1 / -0

I had a passing thought about this a few weeks ago. I don't know any conspiracy surrounding Kobe himself or the crash, but if he was clean and targeted that would be a huge unifying red pill as well regarded as he was among his fans.

Now I already see the other comments and things that there is some questions surrounding it all, so I've got some digging to do...

5
Fellow_CatREEpiller 5 points ago +5 / -0

C'mon man! She is just shilling for her favorite deviled ham company.

4
Fellow_CatREEpiller 4 points ago +4 / -0

Look up Dr. Andrew Huberman. As far as I know so far, it isn't politically leaning. Its simply Huberman explaining the biochemistry of the brain and nervous system and how it works with sleep, meditation, hypnosis, etc. I haven't dug too deep yet, but what I have seen has been interesting af.

https://www.youtube.com/c/AndrewHubermanLab

3
Fellow_CatREEpiller 3 points ago +3 / -0

Possibly, but it is a piece of their argument that President Trump had been whipping everyone into a frenzy for months due to baseless election fraud claims. This should mean that the "incitement" wasn't just on the 6th, but every appearance/tweet since the election.

3
Fellow_CatREEpiller 3 points ago +3 / -0

No different than trafficking TBH, she just isn't at the bottom of the pyramid.

by andrebu
3
Fellow_CatREEpiller 3 points ago +3 / -0

I must be getting dumber. For some reason this was hard to take in...

So, on 1/6 the capitol police called the Pentagon to deploy the NG and were refused? Flynn's brother may or may not have been on the call in his official capacity, which should be completely irrelevant?

Doesn't this just point to the NG being deployed by either Trump, FEMA, or the Pentagon rather than the Mayor or Congress as they want us to believe? (or what is the current story...?)

1
Fellow_CatREEpiller 1 point ago +1 / -0

Archive is a snap shot. It ensures something isn't updated out of existence and further denies traffic($$) to those we don't want to support.

2
Fellow_CatREEpiller 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a shill/troll stating it will take time for us to accept our new programming. His implication is that we've been brain washed and they have a better "truth" to program us with.

2
Fellow_CatREEpiller 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funny you said Re-programming and not De-programming.

3
Fellow_CatREEpiller 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't believe it's over. Too much has happened and there are too many loose ends...but if the video was released 10 hours prior in any way, leaked, other countries, etc...Wouldn't we have seen it before it went live?

If it was pre-recorded, fine...but people claiming they had the recording prior to it going live sounds like BS. Why don't they share it? Why are these people only ever "in the know" after the fact? It's because they are full of shit. They aren't privy to anything special.

2
Fellow_CatREEpiller 2 points ago +2 / -0

I went with 47, march exp.

4
Fellow_CatREEpiller 4 points ago +4 / -0

Small account. Puts on TWTR here.

1
Fellow_CatREEpiller 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like some predator active camo shit.

view more: Next ›