It was recorded on a calm day. You don't see any sign of the gale force winds that were howling through DC on Wednesday. And it was played "live" by a Spanish TV station 6 hours before it started!
sauce moron go to the damn inauguration video you got all the sauce you need. Washington was overcast on inauguration of Biden yet he had sun in his eyes. The weather for that day was massive wind which you saw none of all you have to do is go to google and search weather on that day in DC. Pretty simple. You know the reason the US got in the problems it now has is because of lazy people that are always expecting everyone else to do the work to find information. Why dont you try it yourself.
Mmm I am not sure about this one, I'm about 3.5 hrs from DC and was observing some flurries of snow right when there was snow in the inaug video (early on when Hunter came out)
Now that it makes sense, when I first heard that on Simon Parke's video, I thought he was insane, now maybe not.. we shall see... this shit is getting weird.
I just watched before and after it. If you look closely there is a young boy next to those girls in pink and white. They are either way further back than it seems from the front angle so the side angle they can't be seen or there really is two versions.
I've already debunked the camera angle, the girl in pink (red arrow) is actually in front of the woman (green arrow). but you don't see her in timeline version 2, also the camera pulls back to show the whole stage at the end, the two girls are not there. Also notice the blue arrow person in ver2, he stands right behind Jill, should show up in both angles.
I've been looking over the full inauguration video to provide some scope of where people are in relation to each other, since the cameras can distort depth perception. I have been looking for scenes where it is clear that both Pelosi (presumably) in teal with the sunglasses behind Biden in camera angle 2 (as you labeled them above), and the girls in bright pink and white in camera angle 1 are both visible.
The link goes to 3:33:10. If you let it play and pause it at 3:33:20 you can see all three of the clear markers in one picture. They are actually quite far apart. This suggests it may actually be a camera and depth perception issue.
I was super skeptical and I watched it again (?) BROOOOO It’s wild. Definitely two different takes and the younger girls disappear and reappear and disappear. WILD. Also I noticed that the same two girls look extra sad and not like they were attending their grandfathers inauguration.
Then people wont be in different positions even from different camera angles.
This is the sham of the century.
They prerecirded..it was t funny yesterday...no coats? Come on man it was cold as ass yesterday
It's definitely a camera angle thing. The lens is so long it throws you off but when you consider the extremity of both angles, combined with the fact that everyone was socially distancing, and also sometimes people have bigger heads, I think the length of the lens is throwing off your sense of perspective. All of the background people in the front-on shot are off camera in the side shot and visa versa. Besides, think about it logically. If they went through all the trouble to pre-record this (hint: they didn't) why wouldn't they record both angles in one go?
Same. I'm always the "Did anyone notice what the guy in the background in blue shorts was doing when the main characters were arguing?" dude. People hate watching anything with me.
My husband is the same way. I'm like "what does that have to do with the movie??". He's like "I think it's interesting". Me..."Ok...now let me rewind the movie because I just lost 10 minutes with your instinctual ability to notice the weird stuff.
I noticed that it was broadcast "live" 10 minutes before it was supposed to as well. Then when Charlie said he had seen it 10 hours before it all made sense. I don't doubt that it was pre-recorded. I kind of figured it might be before I ever even heard Simon talk about it.
VideoFag here, don't put too much stock into this theory. These shots are zoomed in from way back. The people in the background are likely 20 feet away from Biden. A different angle could get a completely different set of people in the background.
I'm not saying this wasn't pre recorded, but I think this is all the same cut.
This seems like misinfo shilling honestly. This keeps getting posted and from what I've seen its just camera angles. People want to see something here but i feel there are other things that could use more digging besides this. Its also only vaguely Q related.
I remember watching live and seeing the cross on the bible facing away from Biden and upside down. While checking it later to see if his had was really on it, all I found was the version with the cross right side up facing the camera, and for some reason I thought it must have been from his VP oath, but clearly I was mistaken. I think Charlie Ward said he saw the ceremony at 7am Spain time 10hrs before it aired live here.
It's become commonplace to lace in random people from the crowd into the background at an event.
They do it all the time. It's been standard practice for a good while.
Anyone who hasn't noticed this is the way they have done it for years needs to wake up and learn to see what's right in front of their faces.
Just because you were too dumb to notice something before, doesn't suddenly make it a conspiracy when you DO finally notice it.
Very odd. I did find the lady in white and she was sitting with the asian guy in black but it looked like they were sitting on the ex-prez side.
Is that Mitch behind Biden in the second photo? He stares at the camera(?) the entire time except at 23:20 when Biden says "...many of my fellow Americans view the future with fear and trepidation" where he looks down and to his left. Something bothered him about Biden's statement.
I do this for a living and I can tell right now those are two different clips. When we film scenes, you have to have different setups, or camera placements, the best example is the over the shoulder two shot. You set the camera up over one persons shoulder pointed at 1 person from the others perspective. You shoot the entire scene with the script/dialog. Then you give the actors a breather while the production team sets up the camera from the other persons perspective and do shoot the entire scene again. This works when you’re on set or if it’s a fairly short script, but for big productions where there tons of people around and a longer script it’s two separate setups on different days. That’s because you can’t control the sun, and if it takes 3 or 4 hours, you won’t have a choice but to break it down and setup the next day and shoot the other angle(s).
Not asserting I'm right or wrong, just my observation here: in your picture the girl in pink does appear to be in front the girl to her left in black (our right) but I re-watched the White House official video and at 7:53 it looks like the girl in pink is behind.
edit: Ok this is a truncated video that isolates the discrepancies. Keep watching til the end when it goes to a wider angle, the girl in pink is gone. She definitely walked up to the platform along with Joe, Jill, and the other girl.
initially I thought it was camera angle as well (I'm a video editors, with 20 years of experience), but if you actually watch the entire footage, at the end, the camera pull back to show the whole thing, it remains in timeline version 2
I just don't think this is a camera angle issue. Look at the entire crowd between the two camera angles. There are only 3 people that I am certain are in both: Joe, Jill, and (I think) Hallie Biden. Watch the whole minute or so of video. My eyes are telling me its not the same crowd.
A dementia-riddled pedo warhawk who can barely put together a complete sentence who was falsely installed in our government by the CCP and Big Tech oligarchy to do the biddings of the globalists?
It's also odd for you to be spending your time on this forum with what you blindly believe...
I've gotten the exact same reply on Reddit when I mention the same anomaly. So you spend your time (before 6 PM) on this message board for your entertainment even though you don't agree with its views while also spewing NPC buzzwords like "clowns".
We see through you, hope you know that lol. That or you honestly have no life at all. You should try online gaming, reading a book (one with views you agree with to at least gain knowledge), or hang out with family. I'm sorry you're like this though.
It was recorded on a calm day. You don't see any sign of the gale force winds that were howling through DC on Wednesday. And it was played "live" by a Spanish TV station 6 hours before it started!
Sauce?
Edit: RE Spanish TV station that played it early
sauce moron go to the damn inauguration video you got all the sauce you need. Washington was overcast on inauguration of Biden yet he had sun in his eyes. The weather for that day was massive wind which you saw none of all you have to do is go to google and search weather on that day in DC. Pretty simple. You know the reason the US got in the problems it now has is because of lazy people that are always expecting everyone else to do the work to find information. Why dont you try it yourself.
Spanish TV station that showed it 6 hours early.
I also want to see sauce on early recording
source was the alien fucker
Mmm I am not sure about this one, I'm about 3.5 hrs from DC and was observing some flurries of snow right when there was snow in the inaug video (early on when Hunter came out)
Someone said this was pre recorded and they were in spain it came out 10 hours before the inauguration was suppose to be live.
Now that it makes sense, when I first heard that on Simon Parke's video, I thought he was insane, now maybe not.. we shall see... this shit is getting weird.
It was Charlie when he said that in the Simon Park Collab Video on his website. Charlie and Simon give me some dose of hopium today.
Something does look fucky
Like CCP Fang Fang used to say "Sucky Fucky TWOO DOLLA!!!!"
It's not. I checked. In one frame the woman in white is there and in the very next frame she's gone.
the link is in the title of the post. Type it in and see for yourself.
Notice the blue arrow person, standing right behind Jill in ver2, he should show in both versions, regardless of camera angles.
The asian handler is also missing. I play this game with my kids all the time... :)
dont think hes a handler: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3qp6vE7auS8
https://youtu.be/q5iCPKDp4V4?t=463
I just watched before and after it. If you look closely there is a young boy next to those girls in pink and white. They are either way further back than it seems from the front angle so the side angle they can't be seen or there really is two versions.
Mitch the Bitch and Nancy are in version 2, but not 1
Not all broadcasts are from the same camera. It’s an angle buddy I think? It’s hard to tell
I've already debunked the camera angle, the girl in pink (red arrow) is actually in front of the woman (green arrow). but you don't see her in timeline version 2, also the camera pulls back to show the whole stage at the end, the two girls are not there. Also notice the blue arrow person in ver2, he stands right behind Jill, should show up in both angles.
You also don't see the girl in white in version 2.
I've been looking over the full inauguration video to provide some scope of where people are in relation to each other, since the cameras can distort depth perception. I have been looking for scenes where it is clear that both Pelosi (presumably) in teal with the sunglasses behind Biden in camera angle 2 (as you labeled them above), and the girls in bright pink and white in camera angle 1 are both visible.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=12790&v=39vj3oALMDM&feature=youtu.be&ab_channel=CNBCTelevision
The link goes to 3:33:10. If you let it play and pause it at 3:33:20 you can see all three of the clear markers in one picture. They are actually quite far apart. This suggests it may actually be a camera and depth perception issue.
I was super skeptical and I watched it again (?) BROOOOO It’s wild. Definitely two different takes and the younger girls disappear and reappear and disappear. WILD. Also I noticed that the same two girls look extra sad and not like they were attending their grandfathers inauguration.
If you watch Monkey Wrex Overwatch's planefag analyze of yesterday's event, some strange shit did happen with AF1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t5Ygvb5VrK4
Apparently POTUS and VPOTUS has NOT been travelling under the call-sign of AF1/AF2 for around 10 days already... VERY INTERDASTING.
Now this is better than the post
Ayyy you might be on to something. I didn’t notice that good eye
Then people wont be in different positions even from different camera angles. This is the sham of the century. They prerecirded..it was t funny yesterday...no coats? Come on man it was cold as ass yesterday
It's definitely a camera angle thing. The lens is so long it throws you off but when you consider the extremity of both angles, combined with the fact that everyone was socially distancing, and also sometimes people have bigger heads, I think the length of the lens is throwing off your sense of perspective. All of the background people in the front-on shot are off camera in the side shot and visa versa. Besides, think about it logically. If they went through all the trouble to pre-record this (hint: they didn't) why wouldn't they record both angles in one go?
Look at 8:39, camera pulls back to a wide shot, you don't see anyone from version 1.
Because you are seeing entirely different people. That's how long lenses work when you add drastic shifts in the angle.
Definitely two versions stitched together.
This is why I used to struggle watching movies is that I would notice crap like this.
Same. I'm always the "Did anyone notice what the guy in the background in blue shorts was doing when the main characters were arguing?" dude. People hate watching anything with me.
My husband is the same way. I'm like "what does that have to do with the movie??". He's like "I think it's interesting". Me..."Ok...now let me rewind the movie because I just lost 10 minutes with your instinctual ability to notice the weird stuff.
He sounds alright!!
Really??? Maybe showing two different angels is the answer...clearly 2 different angles.
Charlie Ward received a video of the inauguration 10 hours before it happened. Apparently parts or all of it were prerecorded. https://www.bitchute.com/video/BVRCyEOAH5ex/
So that means the inauguration didn't actually happen at the right time? That explains why it was broadcasted 10 minutes earlier.
I noticed that it was broadcast "live" 10 minutes before it was supposed to as well. Then when Charlie said he had seen it 10 hours before it all made sense. I don't doubt that it was pre-recorded. I kind of figured it might be before I ever even heard Simon talk about it.
Just watch it again and... No.
VideoFag here, don't put too much stock into this theory. These shots are zoomed in from way back. The people in the background are likely 20 feet away from Biden. A different angle could get a completely different set of people in the background.
I'm not saying this wasn't pre recorded, but I think this is all the same cut.
This seems like misinfo shilling honestly. This keeps getting posted and from what I've seen its just camera angles. People want to see something here but i feel there are other things that could use more digging besides this. Its also only vaguely Q related.
THE WORLD IS A STAGE
I remember watching live and seeing the cross on the bible facing away from Biden and upside down. While checking it later to see if his had was really on it, all I found was the version with the cross right side up facing the camera, and for some reason I thought it must have been from his VP oath, but clearly I was mistaken. I think Charlie Ward said he saw the ceremony at 7am Spain time 10hrs before it aired live here.
It's become commonplace to lace in random people from the crowd into the background at an event. They do it all the time. It's been standard practice for a good while. Anyone who hasn't noticed this is the way they have done it for years needs to wake up and learn to see what's right in front of their faces. Just because you were too dumb to notice something before, doesn't suddenly make it a conspiracy when you DO finally notice it.
No, I get it, my only question was, was this actually broadcasted "live" or was the event pre-recorded and faked it as "live"
Very odd. I did find the lady in white and she was sitting with the asian guy in black but it looked like they were sitting on the ex-prez side.
Is that Mitch behind Biden in the second photo? He stares at the camera(?) the entire time except at 23:20 when Biden says "...many of my fellow Americans view the future with fear and trepidation" where he looks down and to his left. Something bothered him about Biden's statement.
The upside down latches was from inauguration of 2009, you can tell because fake-Dr Jill was wearing red.
How do you explain 24:22?
I don't see any CGI artifacts, but I'm not an expert.
What am I looking at in 24:22 exactly?
the big shot from behind and the capitol courtyard.
I dont think the videos are CGI, it's probably pre-recorded. Which means the inaguration didn't happen at 12 noon yesterday.
I do this for a living and I can tell right now those are two different clips. When we film scenes, you have to have different setups, or camera placements, the best example is the over the shoulder two shot. You set the camera up over one persons shoulder pointed at 1 person from the others perspective. You shoot the entire scene with the script/dialog. Then you give the actors a breather while the production team sets up the camera from the other persons perspective and do shoot the entire scene again. This works when you’re on set or if it’s a fairly short script, but for big productions where there tons of people around and a longer script it’s two separate setups on different days. That’s because you can’t control the sun, and if it takes 3 or 4 hours, you won’t have a choice but to break it down and setup the next day and shoot the other angle(s).
These are two separate shoots.
Not asserting I'm right or wrong, just my observation here: in your picture the girl in pink does appear to be in front the girl to her left in black (our right) but I re-watched the White House official video and at 7:53 it looks like the girl in pink is behind.
edit: Ok this is a truncated video that isolates the discrepancies. Keep watching til the end when it goes to a wider angle, the girl in pink is gone. She definitely walked up to the platform along with Joe, Jill, and the other girl.
https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJt9ee1h/video-experts-is-this-explained-/
initially I thought it was camera angle as well (I'm a video editors, with 20 years of experience), but if you actually watch the entire footage, at the end, the camera pull back to show the whole thing, it remains in timeline version 2
The asian handler is also missing. I play this game with my kids all the time... :)
Alright then, I guess working 20 years as a video editor in this industry, I do not know how camera angles work. Thank you for your honesty, bye!!!
I just don't think this is a camera angle issue. Look at the entire crowd between the two camera angles. There are only 3 people that I am certain are in both: Joe, Jill, and (I think) Hallie Biden. Watch the whole minute or so of video. My eyes are telling me its not the same crowd.
Exactly, you cannot see another person who were the same between the 2 versions except those 3, notice the masks in the crowd. different masks.
Also notice the girl in pink, is actually in front of the woman I labelled with green arrow.
Camera angle or not, it wouldn't change where people are positioned in my little knowledge lol
Well there is a old Chinese saying, 'he who laughs last, laughs best.'
We shall see.
Illegitimate doesn't mean actual president.
He stole it from Trump and most everyone knows it.
Admit it.
Yup, President of the defunct US corporation
You aint black - Joe Biden
A dementia-riddled pedo warhawk who can barely put together a complete sentence who was falsely installed in our government by the CCP and Big Tech oligarchy to do the biddings of the globalists?
It's also odd for you to be spending your time on this forum with what you blindly believe...
I've gotten the exact same reply on Reddit when I mention the same anomaly. So you spend your time (before 6 PM) on this message board for your entertainment even though you don't agree with its views while also spewing NPC buzzwords like "clowns". We see through you, hope you know that lol. That or you honestly have no life at all. You should try online gaming, reading a book (one with views you agree with to at least gain knowledge), or hang out with family. I'm sorry you're like this though.
And in your infinite wisdom, you follow them to beg for attention. Rofl! xD
I’m still on Reddit even after it’s been made into a Tencent leftist echo chamber.
Yo that’s so fucking sick of you bro!!!
The fact that you are here, spending your time on this, says a lot more than you realize.
I enjoy watching you work for your money shill
Dude he’s not going to diddle you like he did those kids on C-span footage or rape you like Tara Reade. I’m sorry :/