Dan Scavino posted this on his story 25 min ago, what’s everyone’s take?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (206)
sorted by:
The gold fringe represents Admiralty law - law of the sea - law of international commerce - inferior to the law of the land. Nonetheless, masquerading as "superior law" since 1933/1938, at which time, all common law courts were usurped and only Admiralty/Maritime law (Crown Temple "legal society" rules and procedures) was taught to law students going forward to this day. Basically, virtually every attorney alive today (unless he/she were 100 years old) hasn't a clue about this.
What's the difference?
If every single attorney alive today, including every jurist, judge, prosecutor, etc. is unaware of this system of law, it seems like a fairly safe bet that this system of law is not in effect.
Particularly since whenever this comes up, the courts dismiss it as nonsense.
Not the same argument. The courts dismiss the argument that people make stating the presence of the gold fringed flag means the constitution is suspended. They make this argument as if this will negate all of the courts positions. All Cognac is brandy but not all brandy is cognac. All military courts under martial law fly the gold fringed flag but not all courts with the gold fringed flag are under martial law.
Can you provide a single citation to the actual case law or the published law review literature on martial law establishing that a gold-fringed flag in a military court attests the presence of martial law?
Maybe referring to this https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/121
no. no one can. it's fan fiction. I want to believe but without sauce it's just flim-flam.
Yes, because of course if we are saying the courts are running under admiralty law, to justify their overreach and confiscation of our $$$ via statutes, ordinances, and sanctions, they are going to say "you got it, you solved the riddle! Here's all your parking ticket and speeding fines back. Heres your permit fees to put a toilet in your basement back. Sorry, no hard feelings, huh?"
Since that has not happened, then this is all just made up nonsense.
I have no idea why you think the courts are running under 'admiralty law'. Nothing about the system of law in general effect, which combines the common law tradition we share with Britain and some commonwealth countries with statute law and the Constitution has much to do with admiralty law.
By definition, statutory law is... statute law.
I don't think you understand what admiralty law is.
Well, no, because the law, practically speaking, is what the body of lawyers wind up doing. It's an activity. You can claim that every single lawyer in the United States is implementing the wrong legal system, but that doesn't change the fact that there is a legal system in effect, which is not the legal system you're describing.
What it is for a legal system to be in effect is for it to be upheld by the courts, etc.
OK, but theoretically ... they wake up one day and realize that they are being foreclosed on the $30trillion, that we are liberated from, they wont be practicing that law anymore
I noticed that Judge Roy Bean no longer practices.
Why did that body forget the constitution during election tho?
You mean the same "body of lawyers" and judges that so conveniently refused to even listen to any lawsuits in the past 2 months? Those "lawyers in the know"? Entire legal system was shown as wrong, all the way up to SCOTUS. Entire legal system today is what DS says it is.
Invalid argument. Thanks for a good laugh.
Not trying to be a dick, but just watch “sovereign citizen” videos on YouTube. Most of the people trying to play that hand usually end up getting their cars towed and a “free ride” to jail. Not saying you are necessarily wrong in your thinking and I know sovereign citizen is a little different than what you are talking about but the concept is the same. If the courts don’t play along, ya got no chance.
Dale yeah!!!
do you have any source to back that up?
I looked it up in a book called History of United States Flag 1880 and it didn't say shit about gold fringe and Admiralty law.
it said that the Calvary Standard was the US flag with gold trim. They carried it into battle.
Admiralty/Marttime law shit is just fanfiction if it cannot be traced to a law book or maritime manual. Same thing with the DC corporation shit of 1871. I read the original Act. It's a nothing burger.
The very first time I heard about the gold fringe/admiralty law stuff was on all the video clips of the 'sovereign citizen' types, who represented themselves pro se and argue their case in court that they dont have to have drivers licenses, pay fines for road use to police etc.
Also citing how they have no obligation to represent any 'united states corporation' interests, that was always part of the depositions and cases made.
Are we really seeing indicators that all the legal premise behind this stuff was valid and correct all along? That the hysteria shrieked about the sovereign citizens in the fake-news media, how they are a horrifying terrorist threat etc was all the same sort of panic and hysteria they applied to POTUS and for the same reason.. that the money-lenders are getting cast out of the temple?
This timeline..
Lin wood posted a telegram a day or ttwo ago about the significance of the gold fringe and why it’s in court rooms.