Dan Scavino posted this on his story 25 min ago, what’s everyone’s take?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (206)
sorted by:
If every single attorney alive today, including every jurist, judge, prosecutor, etc. is unaware of this system of law, it seems like a fairly safe bet that this system of law is not in effect.
Particularly since whenever this comes up, the courts dismiss it as nonsense.
Not the same argument. The courts dismiss the argument that people make stating the presence of the gold fringed flag means the constitution is suspended. They make this argument as if this will negate all of the courts positions. All Cognac is brandy but not all brandy is cognac. All military courts under martial law fly the gold fringed flag but not all courts with the gold fringed flag are under martial law.
Can you provide a single citation to the actual case law or the published law review literature on martial law establishing that a gold-fringed flag in a military court attests the presence of martial law?
Maybe referring to this https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/121
That link was taken down I think
no. no one can. it's fan fiction. I want to believe but without sauce it's just flim-flam.
Yes, because of course if we are saying the courts are running under admiralty law, to justify their overreach and confiscation of our $$$ via statutes, ordinances, and sanctions, they are going to say "you got it, you solved the riddle! Here's all your parking ticket and speeding fines back. Heres your permit fees to put a toilet in your basement back. Sorry, no hard feelings, huh?"
Since that has not happened, then this is all just made up nonsense.
I have no idea why you think the courts are running under 'admiralty law'. Nothing about the system of law in general effect, which combines the common law tradition we share with Britain and some commonwealth countries with statute law and the Constitution has much to do with admiralty law.
By definition, statutory law is... statute law.
I don't think you understand what admiralty law is.
Well, no, because the law, practically speaking, is what the body of lawyers wind up doing. It's an activity. You can claim that every single lawyer in the United States is implementing the wrong legal system, but that doesn't change the fact that there is a legal system in effect, which is not the legal system you're describing.
What it is for a legal system to be in effect is for it to be upheld by the courts, etc.
OK, but theoretically ... they wake up one day and realize that they are being foreclosed on the $30trillion, that we are liberated from, they wont be practicing that law anymore
I can only assume this is a reference to the national debt. If the United States wants to default on its debt, it can of course do so. That doesn't require the existing system of law to be thrown out. Nor are any of these eccentric claims about admiralty law, etc. necessary.
I noticed that Judge Roy Bean no longer practices.
Yeah but one of my favorite roller coasters ever, Judge Roy Scream, is still running!
He was called the “Hanging Judge” and the “Law West of the Pecos”. Been to Langtry, TX a few times. ?
Black or Pinto?
(Sorry. Dumb.)
Why did that body forget the constitution during election tho?
You mean the same "body of lawyers" and judges that so conveniently refused to even listen to any lawsuits in the past 2 months? Those "lawyers in the know"? Entire legal system was shown as wrong, all the way up to SCOTUS. Entire legal system today is what DS says it is.
Invalid argument. Thanks for a good laugh.
It's not an invalid argument; it's a straightforward claim that a system of law that is not recognized by the courts of a nation is, ipso facto, not the system of law in effect in that nation.
Bingo. To me things could be fixed tonight or not for 50+ years (if ever). Things have become so corrupt and perverted that anything is possible with enough people drinking the same kool aid.
Not trying to be a dick, but just watch “sovereign citizen” videos on YouTube. Most of the people trying to play that hand usually end up getting their cars towed and a “free ride” to jail. Not saying you are necessarily wrong in your thinking and I know sovereign citizen is a little different than what you are talking about but the concept is the same. If the courts don’t play along, ya got no chance.
Dale yeah!!!