I'm requesting advice from the old-timers regarding topics on this board NOT promoted/mentioned by Q. I apologize for the long post but I think this is important for those who are in my same predicament regarding Q-research vs conspiracy theories that harm our noble goals.
I retired from a 60 hr/wk job at the beginning of 2020. COVID hit w/in a couple of weeks and I was pissed that a lot of my plans were ruined. I had a feeling COVID was a hoax so I started researching COVID specifically since I had a lot of free time. I heard mention of "Q" a couple of times in 2019 but had no idea what "Q" was. Fast forward to 2020 and I start running across videos on YouTube that mention Q. Ahhh..OK. I branched into watching a lot of those as well. I ended up getting red-pilled too quickly but after a few weeks I started thinking...some of these people in the videos are full of shit.
I shut off YouTube, quit going to all the kook sites, grabbed a notebook, and started reading all the Q-drops from #1-present day while researching the drops specifically and taking notes. Then it all clicked. I soon confirmed to myself that many of the people making those videos never read a damn thing Q said or grossly misinterpreted/embellished things. I could see the big picture overall. I did not need or care so much about proofs, dates, etc. If anything, the Q-drops presented themselves to me as one bad-ass study guide about why things are the way they are. Cool.
I could not use social media for the past twenty years. I was a cop and my former Sheriff had a team of snitches that would actually search out employees' Facebooks and social media and then discipline them for "inappropriate comments" or even "liking" someone else's comment that they deemed "inappropriate". (Remember that old Planet of the Apes meme that looked like Valerie Jarrett? My buddy ended up on the local news and was suspended for several months for clicking "like" on that meme b/c they said it was "racist".) I can't keep my mouth shut so I never participated in any forum or social media until very recently. I am thankful I stayed away from social media for most of my life b/c I soon realized how retarded and gullible many people can be. Especially the group-thinkers. I would seriously be dooming right now otherwise.
B/c I researched the Q-drops independently, my brain was not corrupted by everyone's "hopium", "doom", and other dumb shit. B/c of this, I have no doubt the Biden Admin will be short for this earth. I don't care about the timeline, Q pointed me in the right direction, I researched, I know Q will sometimes purposely give misinfo, and I feel Trump/Q made the right moves that will eventually make everything right. No problem there. I got the 40,000 foot view and I have felt I was months ahead of any news outlet to the point I cringed when they finally reported on something that many of us had known forever. (And I have only been researching Q for about a year now.) Yall get the point.
Here's my problem. I need some advice from the old-timers that have been around from the beginning or earlier:
B/c I looked at Q primarily through my own research and never actively participated in forums, chans, kun, etc., I was surprised to see a lot of people on this board talking about the same fantastical things that Q never ever mentions, or if Q mentions it at all, it is rather vague. Here are a few examples:
NESARA/GESARA: This crowd always goes on about the utopia to come. I have never seen Q mention it once. Q mentioned the gold standard coming back. Q hints at making the banking system less centralized and more fair. I never saw a single drop mention NES/GES. All those NES/GES sites either try to sell you gold & silver and/or have a New Age theme to them. My observations/pattern recognition. Am I missing something obvious?
The latest one I have seen popping back up with a vengeance around here is the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES crowd. Almost 5,000 drops and I never heard Q mention this one time. Q mentions the Vatican / City of London / DC. Sure. But not "ADMIRALITY LAW" and "CONSTITUTION OF EIGHTEEN-SEVENTYwhatever". I ran across it a few times early on while researching other stuff. What I noticed is 5 different people/articles/vids will give you ten different explanations. I see Q constantly posting about restoring the Constitution but never about this stuff. These sites usually don't have the New Age themes as much but they still try to sell you some precious metals. Am I missing something obvious?
I have seen a lot of people claiming to be "Q-supporters/podcasters" talking about miracle medicinal cure-alls and regeneration machines. (When Trump gets back in we will have no more cancer on earth.) When the f*ck did Q mention this? Did I miss something? Q hinted that RBG might have been kept alive longer by medicines not available to the public. Q even mentioned (I believe) the possibility of eventually seeing alternative advanced forms of energy. Q even vaguely hinted at extra-terrestrial life but only because of the vastness of the universe. Nothing specific. However, I see a bunch of people falling for the Robert David Steele types. I like to keep an eye on some of these guys and I'll force myself to watch some of their videos. Amongst a lot of other BS, Steele once claimed that we are sending kids to Mars on a "twenty year ride" to work as off-planet slaves. Really? Come on. Don't even get me started on all those YouTubers/podcasters (including Steele) that constantly have inside info and "un-named sources". That shit pisses me off and I see people fall for it left and right. My friend sent me a Simon Parks vid recently and I instantly sent him back the "alien mother" vid with the reply: "Really. You believe this guy?"
For you long-time researchers (Q-researchers), am I way off here or are some people just gullible and/or filled on too much "hopium"? On one hand I feel my personal research benefited by not engaging much in forums/chans/social media. It certainly helped me not to fall into the "doomer crowd". I quickly realized that if lot of those "doomers" read even a fraction of Q's posts, they would be feeling pretty good right now. On the other hand, did I do myself a disservice by going out of my way to avoid the opinions of others?
Disclaimer In no way am I attacking this forum. There are a lot of really bright folks on here. It just seems that for every nugget of gold, I end up running across 10 pounds of sh*t. :) I'm all in on the plan. I just think it would help if more people actually read it.
Thoughts?
First off, excellent post and it gave me another perspective from which to view things, so thanks for that.
From my perspective as having only recently been introduced to Q I probably fall right into the category you are describing.
Part of the issue, at least for me, is that the Q data goes so far back and obviously requires a huge time investment that it's easy to fall into the trap of accepting other people's assessment/analysis/links without due diligence.
I try not to do that, but I once likened the experience on TD.W that it was like trying to take a sip of water from a fire hydrant - it's just too much too fast.
Whenever I take a step back and re-assess a lot of the drivel kind of just falls away and lets me focus on the aspects that stand out the most as anomalous.
For example, you mention Simon Parkes et.al. True, we have no evidence that his sources are valid, and even if they are he could be being used for disinfo - I take all that as a data point.
What I do try and do is follow up on real world information and evidence, e.g. FEMA, EO's, NG, Fences around DC etc. and then try and understand what I'm seeing actually happen through the lens of that evidence.
What I'm seeing is that there is something, but I don't pretend to fully understand it. Without the time to explore as in-depth as I would like I still tend to pick up on clues that other people drop so it's still confirmation bias to an extent, it's a tricky path to navigate.
What I need, and I think this might apply to others as well, is more of the kind of post you have written that cuts through to the core of what Q is about and more importantly, what it is not.
So again, thanks.
I re-read your response three times so I didn't overlap any of your message. I will support it ... Simon Parkes has zero credibility. He is fun to watch, but that is all he is good for - entertainment.
I have to be honest ... X22 (et.al.) are just entertainment. HOWEVER, I have to give X22, IPOT, and Praying Medic HUGE props for bringing millions to the watering hole that has become an Ocean of Q followers. If there was ever an honor for waking up normies those guys get first honors. That said ... they know as much as we do. Nothing more.
Q is real. No question about it. None. I was an analyst in the Military for 15 years. This was/is a psy-op/intel op. No question about it. POTUS (that actual POTUS) is a huge part. Dan Scavino is a huge part of it. General Flynn is a huge part of it. That said, unless it is someone from that inner-circle, anyone claiming to know something is full of shit.
Concur! (and OP stated it all very well) But I will always give extra props to IPOT for doing original research, looking hard into the dog codes- and his weathermen series is VERY well done. The other guys do speak very well to red pill and bring normies up to speed, give alternate perspectives, but yeah, the HONEST ones admit it's opinion and interpretations. The fastest way to tell a fake is when they claim absolute certainty (or direct comms, no evidence).
Love IPOT. He is willing to go further. Some guys just repeat the same points. He does go deep and tie it together. Which I truly appreciate.
Yes, those are all dependable sources and not nut jobs.
PM not so much. He’s full of himself and his books. IMO
Personally, I think Dave (X22) hurt his credibility with the “Political & Geopolitical News” vids. He has absolutely mastered the art of moving the goal post—he’s full of....enthusiastic entertainment! I love listening to the guy though, and yes, in all fairness he does a good job covering what I want to keep up with but there’s a whole lot of wrong in all of it (though I’m no different there I suppose)..
Found the deep state rebel satan-worshiping pedo..
DEPORT
Thank you for posting.
You just gave every single person that reads that trash that this is not over ... if it was, you would be long long gone, and not wasting your time with 'Q crazies'.
CONFIRMATION ANONS ... WE ARE STILL IN THE FIGHT!!!!!
Mod, is a successful deport also ban IP? If not, please consider
Here is a source from 2013 talking about the three city states. Aligned perfectly with what has been going around lately, and makes perfect sense to me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AeG5549b0Ng&ab_channel=StoneTerrence
Found on this post from October of 2016
https://humansarefree.com/2016/10/the-city-of-londons-re-colonization-of-america.html
This muddies the water - did you not read OP? These things you point to are nowhere in Q. Not saying there's nothing there, but not in play here.
Personally, I'd suggest avoiding sources which are known to be poisoned wells (e.g. parks the guy that bangs aliens & talks on the phone with Q) as you run the real risk of infesting the poison & tainting your knowledge base with disinformation that can & will be used against you if yiu repeat it...
You only say that because you didn't study enough to see things that were predicted actually come to pass.
This, in my opinion, is the BIGGEST problem with the movement. What came to pass that rocked the world and validated tens of thousands of anons that spent countless hours working tirelessly to become village idiots at the drop of a hat? Anything? Nothing? Why—because it hasn’t started yet!!! We were chosen to explain to normies what is coming...once it comes. Look around; does LITERALLY any of this seem “normal”? Now ask why...
Q allowed me (and many of you) to use FB/TWTR to warn those I care about for the coming YEARS. This isn’t just about corruption, slander, money laundering, and war profits. Soon, all of the things i relayed to others will begin to make sense (granted some of it is misinterpreted—or horribly wrong) but from all of that the most important thing happened: they began thinking for themselves. Regardless of their chosen sources, they questioned everything!!
Plenty. But I'm not going to devote hours to show you what you could find by starting at the beginning and reading. Been there, done that. We're so close now that it doesn't even matter.