What the hell does this mean? Look at the date it goes into effect. Link in comments.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (37)
sorted by:
I love you, pedes...but I'm concerned this just means the search results brought back acts that were ONGOING on the day you searched for them (Jan 21, 2021). The Insurrection Act needed to be active well before Bidan's "inauguration".
HOWEVER, even if that's the case, it appears we are in an active declaration of insurrection.
Just my 2 cents.
No- actually that’s completely false. First of all, trumps image is completely on the line, always. We know this. If he had called insurrection act BEFORE the inauguration, it would’ve easily caused a civil war. The media would’ve had a field day with it and people all over the usa and the world would be scared, he would’ve looked like a tyrant. Like hitler. Trumps job is over for now. He was meant to wake us up, and move the “chess pieces” where they needed to go. Then he has to bow out. Let the military take control when he was completely out of the picture so they couldn’t blame anything on him. A constitutional lawyer said explained this to me. Joes “papers” that he’s been signing to undo all of trumps work haven’t been updated on the official website, and they ALWAYS. ARE. they won’t let jow into the pentagon. The soldiers turned their backs on him. They wouldn’t let him fly presidential. I’m telling u- the military KNOWS what happened. And I believe they were the ones with a lot of the plans. Now that trumps out of the way, they can do their job. If they don’t in 29 days, well that would be a cause for panic. But right now, things could look up.
Also when Biden left the podium to go into the capital building, the Marines did not salute him. One more indication, the military does not recognize Biden as the commander in chief!
I also noted that the Presidential Salute Battery did not do their 21 shot 88-Canon salute immediately after the swearing in during the 'Hail to the Chief' music. I've watched every inauguration live since I was a kid because I'm a history geek, picked that up right away. Later there was a 'video' of a salute at Arlington which made no sense. But the Battery was at Joint base Andrews when Trump left on AF1 and they fired during the 'Hail to the Chief'...
That doesn't mean anything, they could have just saluted him anyway, if they did recognise him. Or not saluted him even though he's officially recognised. People aren't computers that follow strict programming.
Marines at Marine Barracks, 8th and I, would disagree with you.
Edit: commas.
You self-identify as a computer that follows strict programming?
Sorry, wrong. Trump didn't have to announce the Insurrection Act, and there would have been no "civil war" if he did. The only requirement he had was to tell the people suspected of insurrection to disperse, which he clearly did on the 6th. "Go home. We need peace. Go home" After that, the Insurrection Act could have been silently activated. We don't need to know. The Insurrection Act is not on the same timeline as the arrests. It sets the stage for it, along with the other EOs, in particular 13848. It wasn't the "light switch" to start rounding people up and everyone shooting at everyone.
Nah man, ur wrong, for real- you’d have to be pretty dumb to think that he’d do it when he’s in office. It would cause an outrage. The blame needed to be on someone else then he could step in. Use ur brain for a sec bud
Are you a moron? If he didn't declare the IA active while he was still in office, when would he have done it? Use your brain. People would not have flown off the handle if he enacted the IA while he was still in office, because that's exactly what they did. He didn't HAVE to tell us, or anyone else, if he followed the rule of law to enact it. Which he did. What makes you think they would have started killing each other immediately?
All of Biden's EO's are posted @ WH not Fed register -
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/
edit to include new info
That's just a PR page as I see it. They are not listed here. https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders
OK, that makes sense. Looking at Trump's EO though, 4 day lag to publish them -
https://www.federalregister.gov/presidential-documents/executive-orders/donald-trump/2021
We heard it was signed two weeks ago, tomorrow. I believe too that we are in an active declaration of insurrection.
I was reading through the 41st Congress' "An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia"
https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-3/c41s3ch62.pdf
On Sec. 4 of CHAP. LXII it says "...and proceedings of the legislative assembly hereinafter constituted, and all the acts and proceedings of the governor in his executive department; he shall transmit one copy of the laws and journals of the legislative assembly within thirty days after the end of each session..."
I could be grasping at straws here but I was wondering if there is an active declaration, could they hold back on transmitting it for upto 30 days even into another Presidency?
If the wording is accurate on that site, the IA would have been declared prior to Jan 21, since it is, as you correctly say ongoing.
I wonder though, did Trump's ED State of Emergency and Stafford/Storm trigger any of this? Just wondering if it's a amendment to something related to the Emergency Declaration.
hmm let's see if that sticks in the next couple days
Love the BidAn!
This means the law exists at the time you searched for/found it. Does not mean it was enacted.
https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=Insurrection+act&f=treesort&fq=true&num=5&hl=true&edition=prelim&granuleId=USC-prelim-title10-section252
Common parse syntaxes grammar. The corrections were to give the regulation non fictional language. The word "may" is fictional Nd has multiple meanings. "It shall be lawful" is non fictional and holds the same meaning reversing the order of the words keepi.g it real language.
There are only 3 states that it is referencing.
No, they are previous uses of the act, with their associated amendment (1963). (This doesn't mean that it's in fact, enacted now, I just mean to point out that those 3 states are previous amendments.)
Oh gotcha. Thank you for the clarification! The Jan 21, 2020 effective date is def curious.
I'm not 100% coz I don't remember atm, but I do wonder if the Stafford Act somehow is codified into this?
The STORM act being a re-appropriation of the Stafford Act. Which I'm not sure atm if Trump's ED (not EO) from Jan 11 was calling on that?
Storm calls in FEMA, but does FEMA initiate IA? I'm not sure. Very curious though.
yeah. Part of the plan I suspect.
I call attention to "50:202 (last 22 words) is omitted as surplusage..."
These asshats rewrote parts of this Act, after the fact, in order to make it easier for [them] to skirt this law, and harder for us to avoid it if [they] ever decide to enact it on us, the People.
The word "may" in federalese means it's a suggestion. "Shall" means it's an order. And it looks like [they] illegally Federalized the militia(s) of any and,or all the States for usage under this Act.
I'm thinking we need to go back and re-read the Constitution "for" the united states of America and cross check it with the Constitution "of" THE UNIYED STATES of AMERICA and also cross check those results with the current US Code.
I fully trust The Plan, but something feels off about this to me. Maybe it's me, though.
An INVISIBLE insurrection! I just KNEW it was happening...or vaguely sensed it, I suppose.
Hmmmmm, interesting