Yes, they asked him general questions about QAnon supporters, but never asked him to officially, legally disavow Q and the Q posts, i.e. To deny the authority by which an agent pretends to have acted as when he has exceeded the bounds of his authority.
I get the main point here (and am not disputing it); however I'd just like to point out that offering "... entire Press Corps suffered from an inexplicable lack of basic journalistic curiosity..." as an option makes this a really hard question :)
Can it be both?
Or C.) The press is a bunch of lazy, stupid-ass Marxist propogandist shills?
I think that out of 52 competing media outlets, from across the political spectrum, from multiple nations, in three years, if these reporters had any degree of free will at all, at least one would have asked "Mr President, can you confirm or deny whether you or members of your administration are responsible for publishing the anonymous Q posts on 4chan, 8chan and 8kun?" The fact that this never happened strongly indicates that every single member of the press corps are working for the intelligence community, OR, if they are in fact real journalists, they were forbidden from asking this question. Now who had the authority to forbid them from asking this question? Was it a) the Trump administration itself; b) the White House Correspondent's Association (WHCA) which operates independently from the White House, or c) the bosses of each of these media outlets acting in unison?
I think we used to have great, honest (well, honest-enough), highly-intelligent and patriotic reporters in our Press ... decades ago.
However, Communism attacked and destroyed this critical institution while we slumbered...
Excellent point on the authority. I would bet it's their bosses ... as Q points out, to ask the question is to unravel the MSM itself, when you think about it.
He wouldnt disavow it because he said we were fighting pedophiles and protecting the children. Plain as day. He said wouldnt everyone want that? I want that! He not only didnt disavow us...he straight out said I want those things tii and I will fight for it.
She asks him some general questions about QAnon supporters and their beliefs, but she doesn't explicitly ask him to officially, legally disavow Q or whether the Trump Administration is responsible for publishing the Q posts.
for clarity to the people who do not get it or do not want to. They didn't ask him to denounce Q or the anons as they did when they asked him to denounce nazis and white supremacy.
I've heard media ask Trump about Q multiple times. Did you watch any of Trump white house briefings?
Lolz! "Is that a bad thing?"...
But never to disavow.
Yes, they asked him general questions about QAnon supporters, but never asked him to officially, legally disavow Q and the Q posts, i.e. To deny the authority by which an agent pretends to have acted as when he has exceeded the bounds of his authority.
I get the main point here (and am not disputing it); however I'd just like to point out that offering "... entire Press Corps suffered from an inexplicable lack of basic journalistic curiosity..." as an option makes this a really hard question :)
Can it be both?
Or C.) The press is a bunch of lazy, stupid-ass Marxist propogandist shills?
... or D.) all of the above?
I think that out of 52 competing media outlets, from across the political spectrum, from multiple nations, in three years, if these reporters had any degree of free will at all, at least one would have asked "Mr President, can you confirm or deny whether you or members of your administration are responsible for publishing the anonymous Q posts on 4chan, 8chan and 8kun?" The fact that this never happened strongly indicates that every single member of the press corps are working for the intelligence community, OR, if they are in fact real journalists, they were forbidden from asking this question. Now who had the authority to forbid them from asking this question? Was it a) the Trump administration itself; b) the White House Correspondent's Association (WHCA) which operates independently from the White House, or c) the bosses of each of these media outlets acting in unison?
I think we used to have great, honest (well, honest-enough), highly-intelligent and patriotic reporters in our Press ... decades ago.
However, Communism attacked and destroyed this critical institution while we slumbered...
Excellent point on the authority. I would bet it's their bosses ... as Q points out, to ask the question is to unravel the MSM itself, when you think about it.
I only remember the one time from the NBC bitch.
He wouldnt disavow it because he said we were fighting pedophiles and protecting the children. Plain as day. He said wouldnt everyone want that? I want that! He not only didnt disavow us...he straight out said I want those things tii and I will fight for it.
Go to about min 13 or just after. She asks about qanon https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5yUnUxpr_g
Why does the mockingbird media repeat the same 4AM talking points across the globe? Disturbing.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9YP5LBhiwL4
She asks him some general questions about QAnon supporters and their beliefs, but she doesn't explicitly ask him to officially, legally disavow Q or whether the Trump Administration is responsible for publishing the Q posts.
for clarity to the people who do not get it or do not want to. They didn't ask him to denounce Q or the anons as they did when they asked him to denounce nazis and white supremacy.
It's Q. QAnon was made up by the media.
the rothchilds own reuters and the ap
There is Q, there are anons, there is no Qanon.
4881
And during that time, over 1,000 Q hit pieces on the written MSM