"But there are cars behind Joe!"
Satellite view clearly shows a road behind the Oval Office.
Also, a quick image search on "Oval Office" shows a road out the window with Trump sitting at the desk.
"But there are square lights reflecting in the windows! Clearly from a H-wood set!"
Photographers use lights to illuminate the space.
In that same image search from earlier, you'll see a picture of Trump with square lights reflecting behind him too.
Don't get me wrong, I'm patiently waiting too. There are too many coincidences for this to just end now; the best is yet to come. Looking for the smoking gun in the Oval Office pictures is a waste of time. Think--- why would Biden and all the media gathered around him all agree to run though an act on a fake set? No, they have to think they're doing the real thing in the real location.
If it was played straight, rather than as a parody, do you think the average person would question it? Heck, we have people here getting caught up in fake stuff every day.
Okay, I get you, too -- and I agree. Faking the "installation" would be very difficult and time-consuming. The oval office, though, not so much, as is evidenced by the "Queen" video.
Well in that case the world is flat. Because it could all be faked. Just because something can happen doesn't mean that it did.
Let's really think for a second here. Are we going to assume that he gets into office and immediately goes, let's change the carpet, nothing else, just the carpet and these pictures. Now let's get to business and grab a camera, I wanna sign these 17 executive orders and show these people I mean business, but first the carpet.
You are proving my point bro. You are saying this is proof but tons of stuff isn't the same. We know that there are 9 replica white houses in the world. We know that there are a ton of replica oval offices in the world. So for you to say Proof when it isn't proof is a shill thing to do bro. I realize you have the best of intentions, but the road to hell is paved with those. Why do you think they can put a tree in the back that can look the same, but not the rest of it. Proof is uncertain, I would say gives reason for suspicion.
Nice work, I wasn't sold on the idea.
Oye, look at the curtain wrinkle. It is exactly the same.
I don't like it, but either Biden is in that office or the Chinese seamstresses did a bang-up job.
Yep.
It was fun to entertain but certainly not possible. There was a parade (with few people attending).
It is the real oval office. The focus should be on something else.
That fucking useless faggot sitting there with his mask on. What a fucking retard.
PedoJoe has got to go! (legally, nonviolently of course)
No his not Trump has more yellow and red circles oozing about!
You forgot to mention a few:
"But there are cars behind Joe!" Satellite view clearly shows a road behind the Oval Office. Also, a quick image search on "Oval Office" shows a road out the window with Trump sitting at the desk.
"But there are square lights reflecting in the windows! Clearly from a H-wood set!" Photographers use lights to illuminate the space. In that same image search from earlier, you'll see a picture of Trump with square lights reflecting behind him too.
Don't get me wrong, I'm patiently waiting too. There are too many coincidences for this to just end now; the best is yet to come. Looking for the smoking gun in the Oval Office pictures is a waste of time. Think--- why would Biden and all the media gathered around him all agree to run though an act on a fake set? No, they have to think they're doing the real thing in the real location.
seasons btw
Deep fakes can be very convincing. Watch the video of Queen Elizabeth embedded in this article. It will blow your mind. https://www.deepfakequeen.com/
Oh, and BTW: Go back and read my first post again. There is a VIDEO in this article. Watch the video.
If it was played straight, rather than as a parody, do you think the average person would question it? Heck, we have people here getting caught up in fake stuff every day.
I didn't mean to imply that the photos at the top were convincing. A well-done deep fake, however, can be.
Okay, I get you, too -- and I agree. Faking the "installation" would be very difficult and time-consuming. The oval office, though, not so much, as is evidenced by the "Queen" video.
Trump was filming in the same fake oval office set. Jeb has been in power this whole time in the real one.
Retarded ass thread. Way to much proof it's faked retard
Hollywood can make everything look real.
Can backgrounds not be green screened? Finding the same phones shouldn't be too hard either.
Show the one with the carpet. Totally different.
Well in that case the world is flat. Because it could all be faked. Just because something can happen doesn't mean that it did.
Let's really think for a second here. Are we going to assume that he gets into office and immediately goes, let's change the carpet, nothing else, just the carpet and these pictures. Now let's get to business and grab a camera, I wanna sign these 17 executive orders and show these people I mean business, but first the carpet.
OH so now you are saying they changed a bunch of stuff. so you didn't mean proof. You meant some reason to be suspicious. Retitle it or your a shill.
You are proving my point bro. You are saying this is proof but tons of stuff isn't the same. We know that there are 9 replica white houses in the world. We know that there are a ton of replica oval offices in the world. So for you to say Proof when it isn't proof is a shill thing to do bro. I realize you have the best of intentions, but the road to hell is paved with those. Why do you think they can put a tree in the back that can look the same, but not the rest of it. Proof is uncertain, I would say gives reason for suspicion.