First, who the hell was that who swore Biden in? She wasn't even a member of SCOTUS, much less the Chief Justice. Does the Chief Justice usually do it just because of precedent or is there something somewhere that says he or another member of SCOTUS has to do it?
Second, regarding the rumors that the broadcast was shown a full 8 hours early in Spain (multiple reports of that so far it seems), I will say this: I was stunned when I turned on my feed to it and it wasn't yet noon and Biden was already delivering his speech post swearing in. I remember thinking at the time how odd that was that they had done it early, even if it was just by a few minutes.
Thoughts on those?
I live in Spain and have heard nothing of a broadcast being what was originally 11 hours early, and now you're saying 8 hours early. At either of those times it would've been at 7am or 10am respectively, and not a single person I talked to that day mentioned anything about an inauguration taking place earlier that day. The opposite in fact, they were talking about the inauguration that was going to be on later that day.
I don't really watch the Spanish MSM that much naturally, but the bits I do check here and there, I also saw no report of it, not that they would mention it. But I have literally only heard about it on this website. So it just seems like more gossip and hearsay to me tbh.
Thanks.
That's good to know. I wasn't clear on the hours and just threw an estimate out from memory. I just checked and the bald guy in this video below claims he received it 10 hours before it went public. Don't know if he's telling the truth or not. Start at 3:30 in. https://www.simonparkes.org/post/simon-parkes-charlie-ward-david-nino-rodriguez-tiana-islam
That's Charlie Ward. As I understand it he says that he received a link or a recording of the inauguration by mail or something, not that it was publicly broadcast. I suppose he lives in Spain, that's why he mentions the country, for people to understand which time zone 7h refers to.
I don't trust Charlie Ward, get a VERY creepy feeling from him and his nonsense about having all these "insiders" as buds but of course, can't reveal ANY of them. Do you think his being in selling gold, etc. has influenced his "salesmanship" on current events??
I believe at least part of the inauguration was prerecorded so his claim might be true. I have no idea about the veracity of Ward's and Parkes claims in general. Maybe I am naive but I think they are sincere and put out information they receive and believe is true. But that is no guarantee the information is correct so I take everything with a pinch of salt. Even if it is information that comes from white hats, it can be deliberate disinformation to throw the enemy off course. Real white hats would never put out information that can tip the deep state off, only things that are considered "harmless" or already history. That's what I think just based on logic.
Perhaps it did, I imagine if it did it would've gotten shut down very quickly. But I dunno, still feel like I would need more proof than this random bald guy talking about it.
Totally. That's why I'm hoping to crowdsource this right now.
He can have whatever kink he wants as long as his intel is true
Since every damn commneter says this, is it possible he has done anything else of worth, or is it just the meme now?? Just askin'
Only reason I asked is a couple of weeks ago when I saw a lot of slamming on him I looked him up on youtube. My impression was he was fucking boring and none of that other stuff was mentioned. Thanks.
Yeah, to me that is a total red herring, a poisoning of the well.
Nobody should get sidetracked on that, unless, against all logic and current evidence, there is some incontrovertible proof. But I don't think there will be, because it's essentially nonsensical.
Sorry which part.
The played 10 hours early on TV in Spain and als got sent 10 hours ahead of time to some weird English conspiracy dude who didn't bother to post it everywhere, all over the internet, to instantly reveal the fraud... part.
I hear you, but I feel like if that had happened word of it would've spread around.
If any of you have seen the movie "Wag the Dog", I'm definitely getting that vibe right now.
Do elaborate, please.
stop what you’re doing and watch the movie right now. it is that important, relevant and generally helpful to your daily life
Woof, woof :-))
Not a Willie Nelson but here's a good song of mine for the movie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GHhO6Fj9aY0&pbjreload=101
There is a fair amount of evidence that it was all done a day earlier, and required the editing of many "takes" to get a coherent oath of office out of Bi Den. This explains the magic disappearing teleprompters, podium and people during the "live" broadcast. That also explains how Spain could get a copy 10 hours before it was supposed to be held the next day.
Theres 2 videos of biden being sworn in. One with justice Roberts and the other with some lady
I couldn't stomach watching the videos but pictures I have seen show Roberts searing in Jack Ass, and Sotomayor swearing in the other one.
Really? Can you link me to them? That would be very interesting if true.
Right. That’s weird. Harris was sworn in by one of the female justices.
You said you saw the one with the lady. Here's the one with Roberts. https://youtu.be/q5iCPKDp4V4
No I'm going off of hearsay. I turned my feed on at 11:50 ET and the swearing in had already taken place. So I didn't actually see who swore him in, someone in a video I just watched claimed that. But if there IS a video of someone else doing it that would be very interesting, but perhaps it doesn't exist.
Well now i can seem to find it... funny. I know i saw it, but i can't prove it at the moment, ill keep looking
Take your time. I appreciate it.
What? Im scetchy about anything right now, after falling for the fake oval office thing yesterday I'm squinty eyeing anything before I share fo sho
You're right to feel that way. Lot of rumors swirling right now I'm hoping we can cut through the noise and find the truth.
want a third thing you wont be able to shake? google pat us20200258338a1 and read it
Blockchain voting for that patent, right? https://graviolateam.blogspot.com/2020/11/secure-voting-system-pat.html?m=1
yeah that's it
JFC
I really don't want to. Can you give me a tl;dr before I commit to that?
https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJjuHkE3/nothing-can-stop-what-is-coming-/
Oh interesting. Yeah I remember hearing about that months ago. I thought Trump was going to institute it last minute. No reason to think he was going to; i was just hoping he would.
I have no idea and don't want to know what "blockchain" tech is.
What I DO know is the only close to secure voting method is paper, pen, and ID.
yes but under guise of CoViD-19 they forced mail in votes or in person votes. How do u prove someone voted only once, when many people were mailed ballots but voted in person.
We have all the bright folks who present hours and hours of evidence on that and more. I just put out my opinion.
the patent shows that the federal government atleast attempted to secure the vote by using the us postal service which makes a lot of sense as it is local to every single community across the country. im not advocating one way or another for or against the use of blockchain tech, I am saying u cannot keep a persons identity on file with their vote so using block chain technically would keep all info of the voter except name and still document the transaction like how bitcoin and ethereal currency works. I'm not an expert on block chain but am familiar enough to understand the implications if this patent is real
look for ur self https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200258338A1/en if you dont trust my link google : pat US20200258338A1
I saw the patent, no issue with it. Just overwhelmed with research now on other stuff. Thanks.
Justice Roberts swore Biden in fren -- idk who the lady was that swore Cameltoe in
I think the time was either 11:43 or 11:48 it was one of those two?
Does he provide any proof of that or is he just re-reporting the same stuff we all heard elsewhere?