Point 1, its true that being assigned a special prosecutor the only way such prosecutor can be dismissed is by a direct order from a sitting AG. No other way.
Point 2, and we've seen it already before. Durham report does not go directly to the public consumption, to us, the people, it goes to the sitting AG. And nowhere else. And it is up to the sitting AG to then provide a "general overview" of what AG thinks the report says (and not what the report could actually say). It is also up to the sitting AG and DoInjustice to either act on the report and its findings, or simply sit on them and sweep them under the rug. Horowitz report came out, can you recall anyone paying the price?
Don't forget that even though Mueller report indicated they found absolutely no factual data to prove Russia collusion, Mueller then STILL said to the Senate that he believes there was one. And paid no price for the open lie to the Senate under oath.
I want to believe what your Canadian guy says, but his analysis does not really align with how things really work. And as we've seen them work under Trump, with this abomination now in the WH all bets are way off, including Durham.
Its either something happens by March 4, or all of this talk of "Durham justice" will be just that, talk. Hunter and his uncle are now OPENLY SELLING OFF access and deals.
Like I said, its a nice and "convincing" read. I'm simply pointing out my own perception and analysis. We all thought at the time that Barr stabbed Trump in the back by naming Durham a "special" investigator, but that now seems a move by Trump himself to at least have Durham finish the report. What remains to be seen is what happens when that happens. As much as I am hopeful that we'll see real names and actions, I am basing my read on the situation on the Horowitz report, which already named names, but then was swept under the rug, quickly. I am a realist, and as much as we all have hopes and beliefs, reality is a bitch sometimes.
I think Durham is an important key. The first Q drop was on 10/28/17.... the exact same day Durham was appointed to Connecticut state attorney position. I don’t think that’s a coincidence. And the second to last Q drop was just “Durham”
Durham gave them notice like a week ago that he is now investigating why the DOJ did not move on hunters laptop. Where they trying to influence an election by not arresting Hunter for fucking children on camera?
either he has a dossier ready to go like 6 months ago or he doesn't
one ploy would be to present it to the AG - and then leak it online at the same time - thus forcing the AG to take action - thereby making Biden's own administration implode by prosecuting itself and forcing the Dems to impeach their very own president.
I'm also looking for hope. I feel like there's no justice in the courts. Judges don't want to engage issues going against the DS. Much like SCOTUS. Hoping the military is in charge. That would be a game changer as military tribunals won't shy away.
Durham is a recluse, which is one of the reasons why Trump chose him. He won't go to the media with any claims, he'll do his job in silence and get things done behind the scenes. I do believe he is going to carry much of the burden of bringing many people down without getting much of the credit.
durham could be standing on the senate floor with the knife still in his eye, blood gushing everywhere, and dems would say there is no evidence durham's eyes were harmed, and the media would back them up and shame anyone who was an eye conspiracy theorist
Redpilling most of the planet is out best shot
2 issues with the above analysis.
Point 1, its true that being assigned a special prosecutor the only way such prosecutor can be dismissed is by a direct order from a sitting AG. No other way.
Point 2, and we've seen it already before. Durham report does not go directly to the public consumption, to us, the people, it goes to the sitting AG. And nowhere else. And it is up to the sitting AG to then provide a "general overview" of what AG thinks the report says (and not what the report could actually say). It is also up to the sitting AG and DoInjustice to either act on the report and its findings, or simply sit on them and sweep them under the rug. Horowitz report came out, can you recall anyone paying the price?
Don't forget that even though Mueller report indicated they found absolutely no factual data to prove Russia collusion, Mueller then STILL said to the Senate that he believes there was one. And paid no price for the open lie to the Senate under oath.
I want to believe what your Canadian guy says, but his analysis does not really align with how things really work. And as we've seen them work under Trump, with this abomination now in the WH all bets are way off, including Durham.
Its either something happens by March 4, or all of this talk of "Durham justice" will be just that, talk. Hunter and his uncle are now OPENLY SELLING OFF access and deals.
Like I said, its a nice and "convincing" read. I'm simply pointing out my own perception and analysis. We all thought at the time that Barr stabbed Trump in the back by naming Durham a "special" investigator, but that now seems a move by Trump himself to at least have Durham finish the report. What remains to be seen is what happens when that happens. As much as I am hopeful that we'll see real names and actions, I am basing my read on the situation on the Horowitz report, which already named names, but then was swept under the rug, quickly. I am a realist, and as much as we all have hopes and beliefs, reality is a bitch sometimes.
I think Durham is an important key. The first Q drop was on 10/28/17.... the exact same day Durham was appointed to Connecticut state attorney position. I don’t think that’s a coincidence. And the second to last Q drop was just “Durham”
Yes.
There is no only shot.
That would be a not-good plan.
There are many shots, already lined up, just waiting for the trigger squeeze.
you think they will auction spots on the firing squads on ebay ?
i'm handy with an AR :-)
I'm sure they could make a spot for you.
Durham gave them notice like a week ago that he is now investigating why the DOJ did not move on hunters laptop. Where they trying to influence an election by not arresting Hunter for fucking children on camera?
"investigating"
either he has a dossier ready to go like 6 months ago or he doesn't
one ploy would be to present it to the AG - and then leak it online at the same time - thus forcing the AG to take action - thereby making Biden's own administration implode by prosecuting itself and forcing the Dems to impeach their very own president.
this would be FkG hysterical.
The Military is the ONLY way. Durham may be the catalyst or the impeachment or something that Xiden does...
I'm also looking for hope. I feel like there's no justice in the courts. Judges don't want to engage issues going against the DS. Much like SCOTUS. Hoping the military is in charge. That would be a game changer as military tribunals won't shy away.
This is my take on it:
https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJjs0PLy/b2-payload-path-sessionhuber--wh/c/
Durham is a recluse, which is one of the reasons why Trump chose him. He won't go to the media with any claims, he'll do his job in silence and get things done behind the scenes. I do believe he is going to carry much of the burden of bringing many people down without getting much of the credit.
we're our best shot
After Clinesmith, why would I think anything just would happen.
Because Clinesmith happened and after that Durham was upgraded to Special Counsel.
That doesn’t happen if he still has more indictments coming.
If so, then God help us all. We had a lot of hope in Huber and Horowitz too. That didn't turn out so well.
I'm a skeptic - nothing good has come from DOJ or subordinates
I consider this good from DoJ:
https://greatawakening.win/p/11SKC3PtMQ/looky-here-at-the-justice-activi/
Of course he can be fired by Biden.
Democrats can do whatever the f*** they want, any time, any where.
Biden could stab Durham in the eye, and the Democrats in the House wouldn't vote to impeach him.
If they did, Democrats in the Senate wouldn't vote to convict him.
Biden can’t fire a Special Counsel.
Saturday Night Massacre
Yes he can.
If Biden is President he can direct his AG to fire Durham. If the AG refuses, he can fire the AG.
It doesn't matter if it breaks the law. The only thing that can be done to stop him is impeachment. And that won't happen.
Sauce? Or do we just have to take your word for it?
durham could be standing on the senate floor with the knife still in his eye, blood gushing everywhere, and dems would say there is no evidence durham's eyes were harmed, and the media would back them up and shame anyone who was an eye conspiracy theorist
Yep.
This doesn't depend on a Durham who can be fired by a "President" Bidan.
But a Durham that cannot be fired by military leadership will be a vehicle for utter destruction of the Deep State.