Qpost 4 Oct 29, 2017 states "What SC decision opened the door for a sitting President to activate - what must be showed?"
Searching through past cases I've found possible canidates but nothing that really sticks out IMO.
Q told us early on it had it be the military. Despite insurection taking place throughout the US by ANTIFA/BLM. It wasn't until the Capitol "breach" that it started gaining the attention of everyone. Mainly due to MSM pushing it to impeach President Trump. This caused a lot of people, fren and normie, to give the Insurection Act another look.
§252. Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.
Did you catch it? "Make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings". You must show that the ordinary course of judicial proceedings is being fully obstructed and impracticable. What happens when every court refuses to hear your case, including SCOTUS?
The Supreme court decision NOT to hear the case opened the door for the President to "call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion."
Q post 461
Jan 04, 2018 What makes a movie GOOD? GREAT ACTORS? Q
I’ve had the thought myself, wondering why his 3 SCOTUS picks betrayed him. There’s got to be something behind it.
Or distancing themselves from Trump to earn points with the left and seem impartial.
They've already done that, not buying it. I would buy complete betrayal for bribe or threats though.
After the way kavanaugh was treated by the left? I find that hard to believe.
I'm not convinced this isn't what happened yet.
They're all Catholic and now we know the Vatican was involved with the coup. Perhaps their loyalty to the Vatican exceeds their loyalty to the US. Only common denominator I can think of other than something simple like threats, part of plan, etc.
They all have children and spouses. Im sure that is enough to keep anyone in line
They are all part of the Federalist Society too.
I just asked this. What if the plan was in place but a key set of actors betrayed Trump (that isn't public knowledge) and therefore ruined the plan?
Military is the only way to save the Republic...I believe Military Intelligence knew fully that the SC would fail to do Justice. They have all the data available, as I'm sure they are allowing FISA to work both ways...Roberts, at the very least, has become controlled opposition for the white hats. He's fighting for a quick death, IMO...Time will tell, but all the info is there for discernment! God bless u guys!
Yes there is they are criminals of treason.
Because looking at things on the surface is exactly what Q has advocated /eyeroll.
Either way it worked.