I can tell you as a child, every contrail dissipated. Something changed around 2000 and on. Having a sky full of a grid like pattern is something I would have remembered as a kid. DID NOT EXIST. I am not retarded, just observant.
This is also the part I find most compelling. I used to watch aircraft quite a bit as a kid in the 80s and 90s and like you I remember the contrails ALWAYS dissipated quickly. There were never lines in the sky that persisted for hours, not like what we have today.
I'm not saying chemicals are being sprayed because I have no idea, but I do agree that what we're seeing now aren't contrails.
Yes I did. Made me giddy! Look kids, puffy clouds!! I've never really gotten to play cloud watching games with my kids because vit almost always looks like hazy, stripey blah.
The airplanes now fly at higher altitudes, bonehead. Lower pressure, lower absolute humidity, longer contrail persistence. I see this all the time and I live south of a major international airport.
I watch the sky daily because I work outside and actually take the time to notice.
During Trumps first year there were NO chemtrails in my part of the sky!
NONE. Clouds were different and there were actually disappearing contrails! Gave me a feeling of nostalgia where I would remember seeing this daily as a kid.
You will never have me believe that this is some type of atmospheric condition where temperature, pressure and humidity just completely changes because Trump was elected.
We had a springtime that lasted for several months where the temperature gradually went from cold to hot instead of the usual immediate cold to hot.
Jan 21st they were fucking back!
Well, there's aeronautical and meteorological science. Contrails are just another kind of cloud, and, yes,their appearance and disappearance depends on the weather conditions, particularly governing the level of absolute humidity that corresponds to 100% relative humidity. If the contrail exhausts into an atmosphere where there is still a ways to go before 100% relative humidity is reached, it will evaporate and fade away. If the contrail exhausts into an atmosphere that has already reached 100% relative humidity, it cannot evaporate and will persist.
I have watched aircraft fly overhead ever since I can remember. In my early boyhood (before reading) I watched B-47s and B-52s fly overhead, laying down a long, long contrail. Then, later, 707s and DC-8s. Same thing. As the engine technology changed from turbojets to turbofans, there was less moisture in the exhaust. Contrails became less evident. But as the aircraft began to fly at higher altitudes (35,000 feet +), the air was thinner and dryer. Just as it was when the military planes were flying from 40,000 to 50,000 feet. One spring day in 1970, a classmate and I were walking across campus and noticed a contrail streaking across the sky at an unusually high rate. We made the assumption that it was a military plane at ~50,000 feet and estimated the angular rate of progress and calculated a speed of about Mach 3. We concluded we had seen an SR-71. I am still content with that conclusion today, knowing now what its operational characteristics were.
Net result: yeah, contrails can be of different kinds....just like there can be different clouds.
Don't start saying that nothing would convince you, when you don't know the science behind the phenomenon. You wind up sharing the mind-set of the Moon Shot Hoax groupies. Since there is no evidence for chemtrails, you need to stop imagining them.
I can tell you as a child, every contrail dissipated. Something changed around 2000 and on. Having a sky full of a grid like pattern is something I would have remembered as a kid. DID NOT EXIST. I am not retarded, just observant.
This is also the part I find most compelling. I used to watch aircraft quite a bit as a kid in the 80s and 90s and like you I remember the contrails ALWAYS dissipated quickly. There were never lines in the sky that persisted for hours, not like what we have today.
I'm not saying chemicals are being sprayed because I have no idea, but I do agree that what we're seeing now aren't contrails.
Did you seem to notice significantly less in the past year?
About 4 years ago there was never a day without them (I did photography as a hobby and all my photos had them)
Last year there were only a few days with them.
All different weather conditions, same locations.
Yes I did. Made me giddy! Look kids, puffy clouds!! I've never really gotten to play cloud watching games with my kids because vit almost always looks like hazy, stripey blah.
The airplanes now fly at higher altitudes, bonehead. Lower pressure, lower absolute humidity, longer contrail persistence. I see this all the time and I live south of a major international airport.
I watch the sky daily because I work outside and actually take the time to notice. During Trumps first year there were NO chemtrails in my part of the sky! NONE. Clouds were different and there were actually disappearing contrails! Gave me a feeling of nostalgia where I would remember seeing this daily as a kid. You will never have me believe that this is some type of atmospheric condition where temperature, pressure and humidity just completely changes because Trump was elected. We had a springtime that lasted for several months where the temperature gradually went from cold to hot instead of the usual immediate cold to hot. Jan 21st they were fucking back!
Dittos
Well, there's aeronautical and meteorological science. Contrails are just another kind of cloud, and, yes,their appearance and disappearance depends on the weather conditions, particularly governing the level of absolute humidity that corresponds to 100% relative humidity. If the contrail exhausts into an atmosphere where there is still a ways to go before 100% relative humidity is reached, it will evaporate and fade away. If the contrail exhausts into an atmosphere that has already reached 100% relative humidity, it cannot evaporate and will persist.
I have watched aircraft fly overhead ever since I can remember. In my early boyhood (before reading) I watched B-47s and B-52s fly overhead, laying down a long, long contrail. Then, later, 707s and DC-8s. Same thing. As the engine technology changed from turbojets to turbofans, there was less moisture in the exhaust. Contrails became less evident. But as the aircraft began to fly at higher altitudes (35,000 feet +), the air was thinner and dryer. Just as it was when the military planes were flying from 40,000 to 50,000 feet. One spring day in 1970, a classmate and I were walking across campus and noticed a contrail streaking across the sky at an unusually high rate. We made the assumption that it was a military plane at ~50,000 feet and estimated the angular rate of progress and calculated a speed of about Mach 3. We concluded we had seen an SR-71. I am still content with that conclusion today, knowing now what its operational characteristics were.
Net result: yeah, contrails can be of different kinds....just like there can be different clouds.
Don't start saying that nothing would convince you, when you don't know the science behind the phenomenon. You wind up sharing the mind-set of the Moon Shot Hoax groupies. Since there is no evidence for chemtrails, you need to stop imagining them.