Good mature insight. "General, sir, is there a plan?" Neutral smile. "Is there a what? No comment. Next question." Keeping a secret is simple: you just don't say ANYTHING about it. Outside of a SCIF, it is not even part of reality. The best secret-keepers learn how to selectively forget they even know.
But don't get too exercised over UFOs. This was all beaten to death in the 1960s. Some of the best work was done by Maj. Donald Keyhoe and Alan Hyneck (who offered the swamp gas theory, but had a conversion of conviction). It turns out that 90% of UFO sightings are commonplace nonsense. It is the rare 10% or so that put the U in UFO. But they were elusive. Sightings and observations, but little real data. That is apparently still the case. The recent Navy electro-optic camera videos are little different from film footage and radar traces from decades ago. But some of the sightings are profoundly convincing and disturbing. And it gets the military's attention when UFOs are hovering over ICBM sites and nuclear reactors. Thus the national security concern. I expect most of the classified information pertains to the characteristics of the sensors used to obtain the data, with little real data concerning the UFOs themselves.
You're probably right, but it must be a very narrow tightrope to walk, posting several thousand Q drops, talking about a Plan, but avoiding actual classified subjects. That's what I am trying to reconcile.
I never agreed or understood some of our former administrations announcing their military plans in the media before striking. Its obvious he doesn't agree with that strategy either. He is saying "NOTHING TO SEE HERE!"
First and foremost, if there was a plan, it was a plan, not a q plan. Additionally, q, if legitimate, would have been a leaker, and not the mastermind. I'm new here, and just calling it the way i see it. Q would have been an underling with access to info, not the mastermind, henceforth, no q plan, but just a plan.
https://www.qnotables.com/post/cia-response-to-foia-information-on-qanon
Didn't realize it was classified, that's reassuring in some ways.
He was directly asked about there being a plan..
Good mature insight. "General, sir, is there a plan?" Neutral smile. "Is there a what? No comment. Next question." Keeping a secret is simple: you just don't say ANYTHING about it. Outside of a SCIF, it is not even part of reality. The best secret-keepers learn how to selectively forget they even know.
But don't get too exercised over UFOs. This was all beaten to death in the 1960s. Some of the best work was done by Maj. Donald Keyhoe and Alan Hyneck (who offered the swamp gas theory, but had a conversion of conviction). It turns out that 90% of UFO sightings are commonplace nonsense. It is the rare 10% or so that put the U in UFO. But they were elusive. Sightings and observations, but little real data. That is apparently still the case. The recent Navy electro-optic camera videos are little different from film footage and radar traces from decades ago. But some of the sightings are profoundly convincing and disturbing. And it gets the military's attention when UFOs are hovering over ICBM sites and nuclear reactors. Thus the national security concern. I expect most of the classified information pertains to the characteristics of the sensors used to obtain the data, with little real data concerning the UFOs themselves.
Not just that. Listen to what Flynn said in this speech a while back:
The Advantage In Life, In Business, And In Wartime Goes To The Competitor That Does Not Flinch And Does Not Broadcast His Game Plan.
You're probably right, but it must be a very narrow tightrope to walk, posting several thousand Q drops, talking about a Plan, but avoiding actual classified subjects. That's what I am trying to reconcile.
Just remember mike and his family took the q oath, sounds like he is a believer . also he's spoke of digital solders . Trust the plan !
I never agreed or understood some of our former administrations announcing their military plans in the media before striking. Its obvious he doesn't agree with that strategy either. He is saying "NOTHING TO SEE HERE!"
100%
Amen
And yet he has overtly given credence to it.
The Military does not operate without a plan, period.
The visible activities around DC indicate a large amount of Military activity.
Therefore, there must be a plan,
it would be foolish for anyone with Mike Flynn's seniority to reveal anything during an active operation.
First and foremost, if there was a plan, it was a plan, not a q plan. Additionally, q, if legitimate, would have been a leaker, and not the mastermind. I'm new here, and just calling it the way i see it. Q would have been an underling with access to info, not the mastermind, henceforth, no q plan, but just a plan.
Yup
I missed it. What happened?