Great analysis and I used the info today to redpill three people that were still believing that every single court case was lost or dismissed. He has won 2/3 of the cases brought that have been settled and there are more yet to be settled??? Followed by why hasn’t the news said anything about this??
Well that is a great question to ask let’s watch the pillow guy election fraud documentary and see if we can get some answers... boom
Right, conservatives are fucking horrendous at this shit. The most pivotal documents as it stands for possibly the world is hosted on the equivalent of "Healing reiki" as a domain.
We've got a pillow salesman and wiseenergy propping us up, what next? Patriot Patchouli? Throw my hands in the air with this.
Well the TRUTH is not actually going to be allowed on twitter, google, facebook etc., is it now! Get with the program.
BIG TECH are censoring everything right now. You try post it on any of those. Gee whiskers, its our job to get it out to as many people as we can before we are totally censored and cut off completely.
The site and reports are created by patriot John Droz and his large team of based researchers. Sidney just linked to and endorsed it, so OP wording is not quite right. Jovan has also referenced this site.
Easy access to links, I think is the purpose so that Patiots have easy access to sources to counter the "Trump hasn't won any court cases regarding election fraud" arguement given by the Communists.
I appreciate your commitment to accuracy. I find that overly emotionally leveraged Patriots are commonly making statements that feel good, and should be true, but in fact are sloppy and lacking credibility. I'm guilty of protecting my ego as much as the next Patriot, but I want to be credible when I bring forth the pill that is red.
Because anytime you point out that the headline doesn't match the text and it doesn't confirm the suggested "slam dunk" people lose their composure and act out. My offense was to actually click the links, read the document and then look at the cited backup. 99% of the people here just read the clickbait headlines and then repeat them to others. This why people think we are all nuts.... and why I get downvoted.
The year leading up to a national election is fraught with lawsuits from all sides to work out how they will be conducted. If the Trump campaign had won a case that was then violated it would be a slam dunk in a court case.
This post and Powell are clearly implying that Trump has won many of his court cases regarding election fraud but she clearly states these were about process/rules and not fraud. I quote:
"Twenty-two cases are completed (adjudicated). These are where the court heard arguments, considered evidence (where applicable), and then formally ruled on statutory issues (e.g. the legality of a state’s election process), etc. Of these:
i) Fifteen cases were WON by Trump, et al... So, Trump (et al) have WON the majority of 2020 election cases fully heard, and then decided on the merits!"
Of those 15 cases Powell claims as victories 2 of them were after Nov 3rd and one of them was actually a loss.
Using her cited evidence she lists 79 complaints consisting of 43 cases (she is including other complaints not just Trump campaign) that are dated 11/4 or later. 31 cases are about Rules/Process no accusation of fraud. Cases she classifies as "Case Not Fully Heard" she isn't counting as a loss.
The reality is that Powell's list contains 30 cases that are lost and closed, one that is consolidated, one win and 11 listed as active but scrolling through them they appear to be refilings of older cases that have already been dismissed.
I am not suggesting that these cases were decided appropriately I am just pointing out that if the judge throws your case out for ANY reason rightfully or not you lost that case. I just wouldn't hold your breath that a refiling in Georgia about the watermain break and suitcases of ballots without additional evidence is going to get a different result than it did the first time.
If I remember correctly, PA constitutional issues were being repealed until a month before the election. They WERE trying to fight these changes but ran out of time and the election occurred.
It was. The secretary of state decided to allow votes to arrive in the mail up to nine days after the election. Trump fought that before the election and won. The other case was about the time frame allowing people to correct their ballots. Trump filed a case on 11/4 and that is the case he won unfortunately it only affected 2,136 ballots.
Great analysis and I used the info today to redpill three people that were still believing that every single court case was lost or dismissed. He has won 2/3 of the cases brought that have been settled and there are more yet to be settled??? Followed by why hasn’t the news said anything about this??
Well that is a great question to ask let’s watch the pillow guy election fraud documentary and see if we can get some answers... boom
Settled? How do you settle election fraud? Serious question.
Myanmar might give us a hint.
Based.
When I saw that news break, I knew that there would be a Dominion connection. ??
I think it was actually Smartmatic used in Myanmar
Ah, gotcha! You're right. Smartmatic!
You have to settle for losing the election, even though we agree they didn’t follow the rules. This is the kind of “winning” I’ve gotten tired of.
Of the settled cases...it’s 15 wins 7 losses which is slightly better than 2/3...read the linked articles fren
FUCK. You told him ?
❤ you fren
Wtf is wise energy?
Right, conservatives are fucking horrendous at this shit. The most pivotal documents as it stands for possibly the world is hosted on the equivalent of "Healing reiki" as a domain.
We've got a pillow salesman and wiseenergy propping us up, what next? Patriot Patchouli? Throw my hands in the air with this.
Well the TRUTH is not actually going to be allowed on twitter, google, facebook etc., is it now! Get with the program.
BIG TECH are censoring everything right now. You try post it on any of those. Gee whiskers, its our job to get it out to as many people as we can before we are totally censored and cut off completely.
http://wiseenergy.org/more-about-awed/
Basically all the brainwashed lefties of California need to visit this website if they want their dream of all electric vehicles to come true.
That would be SHOCKING
lol sorry kek
What does this website have to do with Sidney Powell?
The site and reports are created by patriot John Droz and his large team of based researchers. Sidney just linked to and endorsed it, so OP wording is not quite right. Jovan has also referenced this site.
sticky this mods!!!! thank you for this highly informative post!
Prophecies say the arrests don't come till after the resignations in Congress. We have to wait for a while.
Is this new news? I don't think so because any case filed in a court is public. Or, is this post just a depository of the links?
It’s news because the msm refuses to report on it.
Easy access to links, I think is the purpose so that Patiots have easy access to sources to counter the "Trump hasn't won any court cases regarding election fraud" arguement given by the Communists.
I appreciate your commitment to accuracy. I find that overly emotionally leveraged Patriots are commonly making statements that feel good, and should be true, but in fact are sloppy and lacking credibility. I'm guilty of protecting my ego as much as the next Patriot, but I want to be credible when I bring forth the pill that is red.
Those of you brigading with downvotes wanna chime in as to why? Not taking sides just curious as to why.
Because anytime you point out that the headline doesn't match the text and it doesn't confirm the suggested "slam dunk" people lose their composure and act out. My offense was to actually click the links, read the document and then look at the cited backup. 99% of the people here just read the clickbait headlines and then repeat them to others. This why people think we are all nuts.... and why I get downvoted.
not entirely true - before the election, some things were over ruled and some were ignored.
he made a bit of noise about it - but it did seem a bit lame not to be more imposing and aggressive about it -
hey- you're running an election - it has to be done properly.
it's not like the processes or the tech to tighten it up don't exist.
The year leading up to a national election is fraught with lawsuits from all sides to work out how they will be conducted. If the Trump campaign had won a case that was then violated it would be a slam dunk in a court case.
This post and Powell are clearly implying that Trump has won many of his court cases regarding election fraud but she clearly states these were about process/rules and not fraud. I quote:
"Twenty-two cases are completed (adjudicated). These are where the court heard arguments, considered evidence (where applicable), and then formally ruled on statutory issues (e.g. the legality of a state’s election process), etc. Of these: i) Fifteen cases were WON by Trump, et al... So, Trump (et al) have WON the majority of 2020 election cases fully heard, and then decided on the merits!"
Of those 15 cases Powell claims as victories 2 of them were after Nov 3rd and one of them was actually a loss.
Using her cited evidence she lists 79 complaints consisting of 43 cases (she is including other complaints not just Trump campaign) that are dated 11/4 or later. 31 cases are about Rules/Process no accusation of fraud. Cases she classifies as "Case Not Fully Heard" she isn't counting as a loss.
The reality is that Powell's list contains 30 cases that are lost and closed, one that is consolidated, one win and 11 listed as active but scrolling through them they appear to be refilings of older cases that have already been dismissed.
I am not suggesting that these cases were decided appropriately I am just pointing out that if the judge throws your case out for ANY reason rightfully or not you lost that case. I just wouldn't hold your breath that a refiling in Georgia about the watermain break and suitcases of ballots without additional evidence is going to get a different result than it did the first time.
If I remember correctly, PA constitutional issues were being repealed until a month before the election. They WERE trying to fight these changes but ran out of time and the election occurred.
It was. The secretary of state decided to allow votes to arrive in the mail up to nine days after the election. Trump fought that before the election and won. The other case was about the time frame allowing people to correct their ballots. Trump filed a case on 11/4 and that is the case he won unfortunately it only affected 2,136 ballots.
I was saying even before that, news just didn't report it or people didnt understand gravity of situation, ibdidnt