Mike is on WarRoom talking about his video. Threatened to sue Dominion! Wants he and them to go into a room, with media, to look at the evidence. They (Dominion) says he is lying, he says he has proof (information in the video).
Comments (30)
sorted by:
They want to sue for defamation.
Ring Ring... Hi Lin? Yeah this is Mike. You busy?
u/#Mikeyep
Mike should counter-sue for $6 Gorillion
He won't need to. Trump will seize all their assets under the EO.
Even better ! Danke
Nicht zu Danken!
Just had a random thought. ATM machines are somewhat akin to voting machines. (standalone 'kiosk' style machines with user interfaces). I would expect everyone would want to hack an ATM - huge incentive. ATMs have to be connected to the network in order to check your balance, etc. So ... have there been examples of ATM machines being hacked?
I've worked on ATM's in the past, they are networked, but it isn't straightforward to access them unless you have inside knowledge.
A lot of them still run on Win95 too :)
Win95 - wow! I guess that's before windows 2000, which was quite the milestone!
I still see a lot of Windows XP screens, especially at airports; revealed when they have an error and the error message has the give-away XP 'style'.
So if ATMs are running an ultra-vulnerable OS, and have to be networked for balance-check and 'card-validity' checks. and are literally loaded with money ready to give away, why aren't they hacked if Dominion voting machines are so 'obviously' vulnerable? This is just my own personal 'reality check'.
Being networked and being on the internet are not necessarily the same thing.
I agree. There's a lot of loose, ambiguous terminology out there, some with historic origins that no longer apply or are relevant.
"on the internet" - these days, 'everything' is available on the 'internet', including 'broadcast TV', through packages like YouTube or HULU. My local 'ABC-7' 'TV' news channel has their own website where I can stream their live broadcasts, and read their stories more like a newspaper. Perhaps we say, 'exclusive to the internet' - that would allow for (eg) bitchute, but even that gets less clear when you think of YouTubeTV, which is now offering a package including live TV.
And what is a 'network' these days? It's an affiliation of local 'broadcast' stations, that features a news program combining some national elements with local elements.
"Cable News" is now available on corporate websites (cnn.com, foxnews.com, etc) but a lot of people still call it 'cable news' because at one point in time, that really meant, a channel exclusive to cable services.
And then you have people who produce their own news, which may be carried by YT or Bitchute, or just carried on its own website, but they've got a big enough 'brand' to be able to claim to be a 'channel'.
Anyway - my point is, it's hard to know where people are getting their information from these days. Obviously people on GAW are getting it from 'exclusive to the internet' sources, but when a person casually says, 'I get my news from the internet', it's not clear where that is.
All the vulnerabilities in the world don't mean shit if you lock down the means of interaction.
Exactly. I remember at one point, people freaking out that the local UI password was revealed. Being able to 'log in' to a 'walk up kiosk-style' machine means nothing (they are logged in / unlocked by default). Having a 'user' account, means nothing; you need an admin-level account, which is a whole 'nother ballgame!
Napalm?!
He nuked them from space!
Multiple times!
I've been checking to see which, if any, media mention the Lindell video for the past day. So far, I have seen it mentioned ONLY here. I thought there would be some mention of it at Breitbart, or on Whatfinger, but as far as I could tell, no mention there, and of course, no mention by MSM. I'm surprised that "alternative" news sites haven't even mentioned it. Could it be the fear of Dominion that is keeping them quiet?
Case in point, Dominion will probably try to sue OAN for broadcasting it: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/02/dominion-lawyer-says-warned-oan-not-air-mike-lindell-doc/
I did some checking on this earlier as well. I searched Mike Lindell on Faux News, CNN, and MSDNC and none them mentioned his video. I looked at one article on MSNBC about his interview with Newsmax and it was 2 sentences long. 2. They attached the video of the interview but cut it so it didn’t show him saying he was releasing his documentary on Friday. Which is the most important part of the interview. They have no interest in actually letting people see the evidence and make a decision for themselves. When this is all over I’ll be glad to see the media completely dismantled.
just means WE have to spread this shit everywhere ourselves
That could very well be. How would you feel if you were threatened with a lawsuit for billions of dollars? They are a deep-pocket bully.
u/#clownworld
Maybe for optics. Normies: "Oh, Dominion is suing for defamation....surely, they believe they have a case! wow. Dominion must be clean..." meanwhile before any actual discovery is handed over, they're dragging the good guys into court and bleeding them of their $$ with motions and court fees and all that. I don't know. I really have no idea what the hell I'm talking about, this is purely a guess.
I agree. Kareem asked a really good question: "What are they suing for?" Damages? Defamation? I see Dominion as nothing but a bully. They want to scare companies/individuals by the enormous sum of the suit ($1.3 or $2.1 BILLION), hoping the company/person will just back down and do whatever Dominion says. Well, Sidney didn't back down. Lin didn't back down. And now Mike is saying HE is going to sue Dominion for damages (companies removing his product from their shelves) and defamation.
Mike said it isn't about the money (to sue Dominion); it's about the truth!
I wonder if he will set up a page for donations!
If he does, count me in.
You can already donate, in a way, by buying one or more products from the "my pillow" website.
Oh trust me, I have. lol. Good point, though.
They either believe all judges that have punted the election cases will also side with them, or they never plan on this getting to the discovery part. Like someone said just makes good headlines. The media won't report if the cases are dropped or won by mike and lin.