Of course it contains nanoparticles. They are PEG coated lipid containers that hold the mRNA inside. By itself there is nothing wrong with that. LOTS of our best cancer medicines work like that. In fact, that is where this technology started.
The problem is not that it contains nanoparticles, but that it is being used as a "vaccine" (its an immunotherapy) for a pandemic and is completely untested technology in that sphere.
Well, that's one of the problems, there are others. The point is, its untested in this capacity.
Not to jump on the vaccine train here because these vaccines are loathsome but let's not freak out about "nanoparticles" because I'm not sure people realize how small particles ACTUALLY get.
If they had said nanomachines then I'd be more interested.
The important point is simply that the vaccine is said to contain nanoparticles.
Of course it contains nanoparticles. They are PEG coated lipid containers that hold the mRNA inside. By itself there is nothing wrong with that. LOTS of our best cancer medicines work like that. In fact, that is where this technology started.
The problem is not that it contains nanoparticles, but that it is being used as a "vaccine" (its an immunotherapy) for a pandemic and is completely untested technology in that sphere.
Well, that's one of the problems, there are others. The point is, its untested in this capacity.
I like to know who is the person making this assertion, what is their background and on what basis are they making that assertion.
Not to jump on the vaccine train here because these vaccines are loathsome but let's not freak out about "nanoparticles" because I'm not sure people realize how small particles ACTUALLY get.
If they had said nanomachines then I'd be more interested.
The issue with this stuff isn't that it has nanoparticles, even.
It's that it's not a vaccine and yet it's being called a vaccine.