If you are thinking that the Senate "sham-peachment" trial is going to reveal ANYTHING or be even remotely fair and informational... guess again.
The sham-peachment is for Senators and Congressmen to bloviate, accuse each other of things that BOTH parties are doing, politicians to get 15-seconds of face-time on TV for throwing verbal jabs at others... and then vote on a pre-determined verdict.
Trump will be found guilty by 50%+ majority of doing something that he clearly never did... but there won't be enough votes to kick him out of an office that he no longer holds. :>)
Spend your time watching the Weather Channel instead.
I got plenty of down votes in the past 2 weeks for stating same thing. Shame that so few never try to educate themselves even after I pointed out that Trump won't be able to present any elections fraud evidence based on Senate impeachment rules. Kudos to you. And by the looks of it, libtards are now trying to cut out ANY witness testimony, as I predicted as well, since it will expose their prior shams of openly calling for BLMAntifa anarchy during 2020.
I only have one correction. I don't think libtards have the 50+ votes, and its the only question mark I have left in regard to this clown show. And, as one Senate idiot already stated, He doesn't have enough libtard support for 50+ to use the 14A to censure Trump (and achieve same result as impeachment conviction would). That said, I would not put it past these azzholes to try it, anyway, once they fail with impeachment conviction. Watch Chucky shift to it soon after.
What I will be watching for is just one thing: By Senate impeachment rules every Senator is allowed no more than 10 minutes to speak up, and I will keep a tally of all those on the GOPe side who do so. All those not doing their job should be primeried, don't care how "good" their conservative creds may be. Looking at Cruz, Paul, Cotton, etc. So far, just talk.
This document is worth a read, because it touches on subjects and uses some of the same treminology that Q has given us. Very specific things to look at here.
If the words are true, then we'll see very interesting things happening, beginng with the impeachment trial, which is tomorrow Feb 9. So the test of the word and its accuracy is at hand. Watch!
Why? Is that information any more or less credible than other sources were encouraged to dig through in this forum and in this context?
You might not see value in it, but if this is a war between good and evil, does it make sense for us to at least examine what's being said, by someone supposedly speaking for God (Team Good)? Yes it does.
No one's ever seen Q, yet we trust (most of us) that they are telling us the truth. A prophet is exactly the same, except their face and name are up front. Good sys to test all of this, not believe it outright, so I say let's hear it and test it like we've done for others.
I understand cynicism...There are many false prophets out there who are jumping on the train to make a buck...but, there are others who go quietly to do Gods work. Certainly you cannot discount that Q has many, many references to Biblical events can you? So please open your mind to the fact that without Divine intervention we will not prevail because the evil that exists cannot be defeated by man.....
Blessings to you all....
Ooh - that lot a VERY dodgy - don't give them the time of day. TV $$$ evangelists are to be avoided for sure. But that does not mean there are no genuine prophetic voices.
If you are thinking that the Senate "sham-peachment" trial is going to reveal ANYTHING or be even remotely fair and informational... guess again.
The sham-peachment is for Senators and Congressmen to bloviate, accuse each other of things that BOTH parties are doing, politicians to get 15-seconds of face-time on TV for throwing verbal jabs at others... and then vote on a pre-determined verdict.
Trump will be found guilty by 50%+ majority of doing something that he clearly never did... but there won't be enough votes to kick him out of an office that he no longer holds. :>)
Spend your time watching the Weather Channel instead.
"Bloviate"... Good word choice
I got plenty of down votes in the past 2 weeks for stating same thing. Shame that so few never try to educate themselves even after I pointed out that Trump won't be able to present any elections fraud evidence based on Senate impeachment rules. Kudos to you. And by the looks of it, libtards are now trying to cut out ANY witness testimony, as I predicted as well, since it will expose their prior shams of openly calling for BLMAntifa anarchy during 2020.
I only have one correction. I don't think libtards have the 50+ votes, and its the only question mark I have left in regard to this clown show. And, as one Senate idiot already stated, He doesn't have enough libtard support for 50+ to use the 14A to censure Trump (and achieve same result as impeachment conviction would). That said, I would not put it past these azzholes to try it, anyway, once they fail with impeachment conviction. Watch Chucky shift to it soon after.
What I will be watching for is just one thing: By Senate impeachment rules every Senator is allowed no more than 10 minutes to speak up, and I will keep a tally of all those on the GOPe side who do so. All those not doing their job should be primeried, don't care how "good" their conservative creds may be. Looking at Cruz, Paul, Cotton, etc. So far, just talk.
This document is worth a read, because it touches on subjects and uses some of the same treminology that Q has given us. Very specific things to look at here.
If the words are true, then we'll see very interesting things happening, beginng with the impeachment trial, which is tomorrow Feb 9. So the test of the word and its accuracy is at hand. Watch!
I don't think literal self-proclaimed prophets have a place in our research...
Why? Is that information any more or less credible than other sources were encouraged to dig through in this forum and in this context?
You might not see value in it, but if this is a war between good and evil, does it make sense for us to at least examine what's being said, by someone supposedly speaking for God (Team Good)? Yes it does.
No one's ever seen Q, yet we trust (most of us) that they are telling us the truth. A prophet is exactly the same, except their face and name are up front. Good sys to test all of this, not believe it outright, so I say let's hear it and test it like we've done for others.
Q is verifiable and credible. Self-proclaimed prophets are not a good source of hope, it reeks of desperation.
I understand cynicism...There are many false prophets out there who are jumping on the train to make a buck...but, there are others who go quietly to do Gods work. Certainly you cannot discount that Q has many, many references to Biblical events can you? So please open your mind to the fact that without Divine intervention we will not prevail because the evil that exists cannot be defeated by man..... Blessings to you all....
How precisely do you verify Q? Looking for facts not interpretations or opinions.
A number of things she foretold have come to pass. There are many false prophets around, but I think Amanda is worth paying attention to.
I am praying for you. The only prophecy you should take heed of is in the Bible.
1 Corinthians 14:5 ?
My apologies if this offends you my sibling. https://www.gty.org/library/articles/A366/does-god-still-give-revelation
Ooh - that lot a VERY dodgy - don't give them the time of day. TV $$$ evangelists are to be avoided for sure. But that does not mean there are no genuine prophetic voices.
What are some examples? I'm mildly familiar with her, but not enough to know the accuracy of what she has said in the past.
Your words are wise... thank you for them... Blessings...