Is this one of those instances where the true intent slipped out, or was this literally a slip of the tongue? The subject of infertility seems so out of keeping with what they were discussing - basically - the effectiveness of the vaccine against covid. However, the brilliant scientist didn't catch himself, he plainly did say 'sterilize' and John Snow clearly did catch the slip up. Hmm.
The issue is, those 30% won’t know who the other members are. That’s 3/10, meaning it’s possible that in a group of 10 paired up that no offspring will be born and at most 1 couple in 5 will have the ability to reproduce.
The issue is, those 30% won’t know who the other members are. That’s 3/10, meaning it’s possible that in a group of 10 paired up that no offspring will be born and at most 1 couple in 5 will have the ability to reproduce.
Is this one of those instances where the true intent slipped out, or was this literally a slip of the tongue? The subject of infertility seems so out of keeping with what they were discussing - basically - the effectiveness of the vaccine against covid. However, the brilliant scientist didn't catch himself, he plainly did say 'sterilize' and John Snow clearly did catch the slip up. Hmm.
The issue is, those 30% won’t know who the other members are. That’s 3/10, meaning it’s possible that in a group of 10 paired up that no offspring will be born and at most 1 couple in 5 will have the ability to reproduce.
Not if it’s by design. The elites want population control
Ok, so a 60-70% sterilization effect IS acceptable??!!
Worse than that, as I mentioned to another user:
70% you say?
Is "sterilize" a normal word to use with respect to the effectiveness of a vaccine on a population?