It is not included in the Bible we have today, but there's a good reason for that. It was completely unknown prior to the KJV Bible and all of the pre-KJV translations and collections of scripture, so there could be no way for it to have been included in the Bible we have today. They did not have a copy of it to include in the compilation of the Bible, even though it is quoted and mentioned many times, so it was impossible to include it at that time. However, when they created the Canon of Scriptures, one of the criteria they used for inclusion in the canon was; Is it mentioned and/or quoted elsewhere in scripture? Enoch meets this criteria.
The book of Enoch was well known and very much discussed for inclusion. Irenaeus fought for its inclusion, but trusted the Holy Spirit had directed the church to the correct conclusion of what books should be included.
Here's some additional discussion on Enoch (Dr. Heiser is a rock solid old testament scholar)
https://vimeo.com/258158162
That doesn't mean the book of Enoch isn't important. It very much is. Especially because, as you point out, the writers of the New Testament read it and even quoted it.
Just because it sounds like a book of the bible, it does not necessarily mean it is and should be given the weight that other writings have as being from the Holy Spirit. Do your research. The Oriental Orthodox church is the only one that uses the book of Enoch. Here's a table of churches and which writings they use. You can scroll up for more discussion. Ask your Pastor for their understanding and further assistance in researching.
Just because it isn't in the bible doesn't mean it can't be given weight in the proper historical context. We shouldn't look at it as divine scripture but it still doesn't mean it's worthless. I'm not sure why George posted it. I hope people don't think it's a message from God.
14 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,
15 To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.
16 These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men's persons in admiration because of advantage.
The brother of James evidently viewed it as canon, and so did Christians until the Roman Catholic Church tossed it out.
I believe 1 Enoch is Biblical based on my studies. it really doesn't change anything about the Bible, but it certainly fleshes out some of the story.
Genesis 6 states Noah was perfect in his generations, and Genesis 5 already laid out his lineage.
Genesis 5 also has this to say about Enoch-
Genesis 5:21-24
21 And Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begat Methuselah:
22 And Enoch walked with God after he begat Methuselah three hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:
23 And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years:
24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.
Enoch never died.
Hebrews 11:5
By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.
This testimony that Enoch pleased God is not found in Genesis directly (it could be implied in Genesis 5), but it is mentioned in 1 Enoch. I believe 2 Enoch and 3 Enoch are not scripture, but I do believe 1 Enoch is, as it's quoted in multiple books of the Bible, such as Hebrews and directly in Jude 1.
But what 1 Enoch says makes sense and really fleshes out Genesis 6. Fallen angels, who are fallen because they violated God's law and had sex with the daughters of men, creating angel/human hybrids known as the Nephilim (the giants). Satan wanted to prevent the birth of the Messiah to prevent his own destruction. His plan was to corrupt mankind's DNA before Jesus could be born. Genetic modification of plants and animals was taught to mankind by the angels, and all hell broke loose on Earth when man tried playing God.
God destroyed the world with the Great Flood because all of mankind's DNA (with the exception of Noah, his wife, his children and their wives) was corrupted, and He needed to start over with Noah's family.
This also makes better sense of the violence in the Old Testament, where God ordered the Israelites to kill the inhabitants of the land of Canaan. If these were tribes of Nephilim that arose after the Flood, as evidenced by 6 fingers and abnormal size, it stands as to why God would order them to be wiped out.
Matthew 24:37
But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Genetic modification has returned in the last days, has it not?
Since TRUMP left D.C. January 6th I have had a very STRONG feeling he is the chosen in which the MOST HIGH put here to fulfill this mission. Fits with Parallel 3.
That is as far as I have gotten so far into this video.
I'm not religious so I don't know much about it but I have read that the book of Enoch was originally part of the Bible but was removed by the Catholic Church. Anyone know any more?
It is an important book, but it wasn't removed by the Catholic Church. It was discussed for inclusion in the Bible but simply decided against. Likely in part due the the fact Jews couldn't decide if it should be included int he Hebrew Bible either (it is a pre-Christianity text)
Aside from the military videos, I don’t see much connection with Q and George. I really don’t think we should give George the research and manhours that we could be using on past Q drops
It is not included in the Bible we have today, but there's a good reason for that. It was completely unknown prior to the KJV Bible and all of the pre-KJV translations and collections of scripture, so there could be no way for it to have been included in the Bible we have today. They did not have a copy of it to include in the compilation of the Bible, even though it is quoted and mentioned many times, so it was impossible to include it at that time. However, when they created the Canon of Scriptures, one of the criteria they used for inclusion in the canon was; Is it mentioned and/or quoted elsewhere in scripture? Enoch meets this criteria.
https://bibleprophecyandtruth.com/notes/Enoch
The book of Enoch was well known and very much discussed for inclusion. Irenaeus fought for its inclusion, but trusted the Holy Spirit had directed the church to the correct conclusion of what books should be included.
Here's some additional discussion on Enoch (Dr. Heiser is a rock solid old testament scholar) https://vimeo.com/258158162
That doesn't mean the book of Enoch isn't important. It very much is. Especially because, as you point out, the writers of the New Testament read it and even quoted it.
Just because it sounds like a book of the bible, it does not necessarily mean it is and should be given the weight that other writings have as being from the Holy Spirit. Do your research. The Oriental Orthodox church is the only one that uses the book of Enoch. Here's a table of churches and which writings they use. You can scroll up for more discussion. Ask your Pastor for their understanding and further assistance in researching.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_canon#Table
Just because it isn't in the bible doesn't mean it can't be given weight in the proper historical context. We shouldn't look at it as divine scripture but it still doesn't mean it's worthless. I'm not sure why George posted it. I hope people don't think it's a message from God.
https://youtu.be/h5Z04SJENVE
The Book of Enoch is quoted directly by Jude.
Jude 1:14-16
14 And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of his saints,
15 To execute judgment upon all, and to convince all that are ungodly among them of all their ungodly deeds which they have ungodly committed, and of all their hard speeches which ungodly sinners have spoken against him.
16 These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great swelling words, having men's persons in admiration because of advantage.
The brother of James evidently viewed it as canon, and so did Christians until the Roman Catholic Church tossed it out.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Jude%201&version=KJV
I believe 1 Enoch is Biblical based on my studies. it really doesn't change anything about the Bible, but it certainly fleshes out some of the story.
Genesis 6 states Noah was perfect in his generations, and Genesis 5 already laid out his lineage.
Genesis 5 also has this to say about Enoch-
Genesis 5:21-24
21 And Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begat Methuselah:
22 And Enoch walked with God after he begat Methuselah three hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:
23 And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years:
24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.
Enoch never died.
Hebrews 11:5
By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.
This testimony that Enoch pleased God is not found in Genesis directly (it could be implied in Genesis 5), but it is mentioned in 1 Enoch. I believe 2 Enoch and 3 Enoch are not scripture, but I do believe 1 Enoch is, as it's quoted in multiple books of the Bible, such as Hebrews and directly in Jude 1.
But what 1 Enoch says makes sense and really fleshes out Genesis 6. Fallen angels, who are fallen because they violated God's law and had sex with the daughters of men, creating angel/human hybrids known as the Nephilim (the giants). Satan wanted to prevent the birth of the Messiah to prevent his own destruction. His plan was to corrupt mankind's DNA before Jesus could be born. Genetic modification of plants and animals was taught to mankind by the angels, and all hell broke loose on Earth when man tried playing God.
God destroyed the world with the Great Flood because all of mankind's DNA (with the exception of Noah, his wife, his children and their wives) was corrupted, and He needed to start over with Noah's family.
This also makes better sense of the violence in the Old Testament, where God ordered the Israelites to kill the inhabitants of the land of Canaan. If these were tribes of Nephilim that arose after the Flood, as evidenced by 6 fingers and abnormal size, it stands as to why God would order them to be wiped out.
Matthew 24:37
But as the days of Noah were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.
Genetic modification has returned in the last days, has it not?
Very informative. Thank you.
thanks for the summary, really helpful as a lot of this is new/confusing.
1 1/2 hours into it so far. LISTEN very carefully as you watch.
What have you heard or seen?
Since TRUMP left D.C. January 6th I have had a very STRONG feeling he is the chosen in which the MOST HIGH put here to fulfill this mission. Fits with Parallel 3. That is as far as I have gotten so far into this video.
Wow
Parallel 3?
Everyone will hear this differently obviously. I heard 3 paraells explained.
What do you mean, fren?
me too, it's really interesting, and explains a lot.
sure would be help to know who is behind George...
I have a strong feeling they are connected to T
I'm not religious so I don't know much about it but I have read that the book of Enoch was originally part of the Bible but was removed by the Catholic Church. Anyone know any more?
Here is a discussion of which religions use which writings and why. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_canon
Here is a discussion of the Book of Enoch https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Book_of_Enoch
Wikipedia dude? C'mon man!
Still, it's got a table for a quick review that could be a springboard for deeper research.
No answer is better that that propaganda.
It is an important book, but it wasn't removed by the Catholic Church. It was discussed for inclusion in the Bible but simply decided against. Likely in part due the the fact Jews couldn't decide if it should be included int he Hebrew Bible either (it is a pre-Christianity text)
The book of Jude gives reference to verses in the book of Enoch. Very interesting
Slow pede here, can you tell me how to add subtitles
Hit the “cc” button
Thanks
KNOWLEDGE is plentiful. It is up to the individual whether they believe or not!!
Or it's being as a code-book, with time-stamps issued later referring to which plan envelopes to open.
T 45 In the lower right hand corner of video.
Georgenews uses the same font as on the front of George magazine, as well as the same motto.
Aside from the military videos, I don’t see much connection with Q and George. I really don’t think we should give George the research and manhours that we could be using on past Q drops