These two Q posts are critical to this theory:
I know the elections are rigged, but hear me out: what if the plan really is for 2024?
Rethink everything with the context that a slow drip is more effective than a flood. Over the next 4 years has everything been set, by declassification and appointment to key positions by Trump, to be released slowly to be absorbed by the masses. It will be a way to make everything appear as organic as possible, to NOT be an insurrection by Trump! Of course we laugh at the idea, but the left does not and were/are terrified of Trump, many well meaning individuals who are disillusioned.
When everything comes out the way the left wants it to come out though, what do you think will happen if Trump ran again in 2024 against Biden and, since Trump now has only more support than before, they have to cheat even MORE blatantly than before in order to win?
Now we have a repeat of 2020/2021 like everyone has rightfully claimed would happen.
But something is different this time, there was a slow drip of exposure for 4 years and the country isn't divided over what's going on. If the military did what we all expected to occur this year, the only resistance would be by the perpetrators.
It would be a good explanation for why they want to impeach so badly, to prevent from running again. Also a good reason for why Don Jr. said that its going to be a long 4 years recently. The best is still yet to come, we just might have to be patient, but I think once most of us realize that we are still having explosive news on a daily basis exposing everything we will better realize the plan.
Calling it "the storm" by the President in the most obvious "wink" he's ever made could very well be a clever way to fool the enemy into expecting a flood and reacting accordingly without expecting being setup for the slow drip. The first mention by Q about a slow drip being better than a flood came only a year ago, when everything was likely well setup and immune to disruption.
We all do, but only until everyone else shares are fervor can the awakening happen without more needless bloodshed.
Keep pushing things back. It makes it all the more likely needless bloodshed would occur.
A crap ton already has been shed needlessly. There’s only so much that can be written off as necessary Collateral Damage before one is forced to ask did the ends truly justify the means?.
I don't think you understood the post, this isn't pushing things back, it's the reveal we've wanted over a long course of time under terms the left can accept. It's not all about us, and I think we're more able to accept scenarios we don't like.
Yeah it's about everyone losing their jobs and committing suicide because of the bullshit.
Imagine how much worse any alternative would be.
I’m well aware we don’t need to like it and it’s not about us.
The fact remains though. Going the long way means Damage will continue ticking up. Lives will continue being lost. Collateral Damage in this grand game of chest.
If they do go the long way. Then the question is. How much more will be lost? Who? Will the losses be worth it to spare the sleepers mental anguish and discomfort as they’re slowly spoon fed the truth?
It’s a hard question. One that needs to be asked if they end up spoon feeding people the truth till 2024.
I'm sure they've weighed the collateral damage to occur in all scenarios and chose the one least damaging. Remember what is being dealt with.
yes I know, but meanwhile, my family and friends are getting a potentially fatal injection.
I hope that drip to flood implies gathering pace when people start to get redpilled. Is that what you are thinking? Acceleration with progress?
We can't hold out long like this with some of the globalist plans still advancing.
You know what, I actually wasn't looking at it as "slow drip to flood" but more like "slow drip is greater than flood".
Perhaps that may be a/the meaning, but I would expect something like a -> for that.
I just hope this part of the plan works before we lose too many more people to poverty, despair and disease.
I really welcome your analysis, even if it's not what i want to hear.